Collagen morphology in human skin and scar tissue: no adaptations in response to mechanical loading at joints.

Dermal collagen displays a random-like structure that has a major role in strength and function of the human integument. It is hypothesised that collagen bundles align in a parallel fashion in the direction of mechanical tension during scarring, which may explain the problematic scar formation that occurs specifically at joints. Scar tissue and normal skin were biopsied from joints and control areas and evaluated by the Fourier analysis. Collagen orientation was represented by an index ranging from 0 (perfectly random) to 1 (perfectly parallel). Collagen bundle packing signifies the average distance between the centres of collagen bundles. No differences were shown in collagen morphology of scar tissue and normal skin between joints and control areas. Normal skin had a significantly lower collagen orientation index than scar tissue (0.26 versus 0.44, P<0.001). The bundle packing of scar tissue differed significantly from normal skin (18.1 microm versus 23.7 microm, P<0.001). Collagen appeared less parallel orientated in deep dermis compared to superficial dermis especially for normal skin (0.27 versus 0.33, P=0.06). Normal skin had a less parallel organisation in sections that were cut parallel compared to those that were cut perpendicular to the epidermis (0.24 versus 0.30, P=0.02). Collagen orientation of scar tissue is more parallel compared to normal skin. Morphology differs with respect to superficial and deep dermal layers and parallel and perpendicular planes, but appears not to respond to mechanical tension.

[1]  M. Carlson,et al.  Release of mechanical tension triggers apoptosis of human fibroblasts in a model of regressing granulation tissue. , 1999, Experimental cell research.

[2]  H. Berry,et al.  The relation of the ultrastructure of collagen to scar formation and its surgical management. , 1968, British journal of plastic surgery.

[3]  S. Nishioka,et al.  Polarization microscopic investigation of collagen and acid glycosaminoglycans in the skin of progressive systemic sclerosis (PSS). , 1995, Acta histochemica.

[4]  H. Linares,et al.  Wound contractions, scar contractures and myofibroblasts: a classical case study. , 1978, The Journal of trauma.

[5]  J. Vossoughi,et al.  Wound healing. Relationship of wound closing tension to scar width in rats. , 1990, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[6]  M. Wolman,et al.  Orientation of collagen in wound healing. , 1974, British journal of experimental pathology.

[7]  P. Byers,et al.  Structural abnormalities in the dermal collagen and elastic matrix from the skin of patients with inherited connective tissue disorders. , 1982, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[8]  C. Compton,et al.  Skin regenerated from cultured epithelial autografts on full-thickness burn wounds from 6 days to 5 years after grafting. A light, electron microscopic and immunohistochemical study. , 1989, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.

[9]  J. Bos,et al.  Dermal Organization in Scleroderma: The Fast Fourier Transform and the Laser Scatter Method Objectify Fibrosis in Nonlesional as well as Lesional Skin , 2000, Laboratory Investigation.

[10]  K. Holmstrand,et al.  THE ULTRASTRUCTURE OF COLLAGEN IN SKIN, SCARS AND KELOIDS , 1961, Plastic and reconstructive surgery and the transplantation bulletin.

[11]  C. McCulloch,et al.  The compliance of collagen gels regulates transforming growth factor-beta induction of alpha-smooth muscle actin in fibroblasts. , 1999, The American journal of pathology.

[12]  P. Byers,et al.  The structure and function of dermal connective tissue in normal individuals and patients with inherited connective tissue disorders. , 1982, Scanning electron microscopy.

[13]  R. Landel,et al.  The etiology of hypertrophic scar contracture: another view. , 1981, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  C. Kischer,et al.  The histiotypic organization of the hypertrophic scar in humans. , 1972, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[15]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[16]  R. Jordan,et al.  Splints and scar management for acute and reconstructive burn care. , 2000, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[17]  Jan van Marle,et al.  Morphometry of dermal collagen orientation by Fourier analysis is superior to multi‐observer assessment , 2002, The Journal of pathology.

[18]  M Eastwood,et al.  Tensional homeostasis in dermal fibroblasts: Mechanical responses to mechanical loading in three‐dimensional substrates , 1998, Journal of cellular physiology.

[19]  J. Johnson Wound care. , 1984, Nursing standard : official newspaper of the Royal College of Nursing.

[20]  C. Berard,et al.  Healing of Incisional Wounds in Rats: The Relationship of Tensile Strength and Morphology to the Normal Skin Wrinkle Lines , 1964, Annals of surgery.

[21]  R. Steinlage,et al.  Mathematic model to estimate change in burn scar length required for joint range of motion. , 1996, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[22]  C. McCulloch,et al.  The compliance of collagen gels regulates transforming growth factor-β induction of α-smooth muscle actin in fibroblasts , 1999 .

[23]  I. K. Cohen,et al.  Morphological and immunochemical differences between keloid and hypertrophic scar. , 1994, The American journal of pathology.