Application of simplex‐based experimental optimization to challenging bioprocess development problems: Case studies in downstream processing

The identification of feasible operating conditions during the early stages of bioprocess development is implemented frequently through High Throughput (HT) studies. These typically employ techniques based on regression analysis, such as Design of Experiments. In this work, an alternative approach, based on a previously developed variant of the Simplex algorithm, is compared to the conventional regression‐based method for three experimental systems involving polishing chromatography and protein refolding. This Simplex algorithm variant was found to be more effective in identifying superior operating conditions, and in fact it reached the global optimum in most cases involving multiple optima. By contrast, the regression‐based method often failed to reach the global optimum, and in many cases reached poor operating conditions. The Simplex‐based method is further shown to be robust in dealing with noisy experimental data, and requires fewer experiments than regression‐based methods to reach favorable operating conditions. The Simplex‐variant also lends itself to the use of HT analytical methods, when they are available, which can assist in avoiding analytical bottlenecks. It is suggested that this Simplex‐variant is ideally suited to rapid optimization in early‐phase process development. © 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 32:404–419, 2016

[1]  D. E. Long,et al.  Simplex optimization of the response from chemical systems , 1969 .

[2]  Karol M. Łącki,et al.  High throughput process development in biomanufacturing , 2014 .

[3]  Arushi Arora,et al.  Guidance for performing multivariate data analysis of bioprocessing data: Pitfalls and recommendations , 2014, Biotechnology progress.

[4]  K. Eriksson,et al.  Development of an intermediate chromatography step in an insulin purification process. The use of a High Throughput Process Development approach based on selectivity parameters. , 2014, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[5]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[6]  G. R. Hext,et al.  Sequential Application of Simplex Designs in Optimisation and Evolutionary Operation , 1962 .

[7]  A. Rathore,et al.  Chromatography process development in the quality by design paradigm I: Establishing a high‐throughput process development platform as a tool for estimating “characterization space” for an ion exchange chromatography step , 2013, Biotechnology progress.

[8]  S. Deming,et al.  Simplex optimization of analytical chemical methods , 1974 .

[9]  John P Welsh,et al.  A practical strategy for using miniature chromatography columns in a standardized high‐throughput workflow for purification development of monoclonal antibodies , 2014, Biotechnology progress.

[10]  Spyridon Konstantinidis,et al.  Identifying analytics for high throughput bioprocess development studies , 2013, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[11]  I. C. Kenworthy Some Examples of Simplex Evolutionary Operation in the Paper Industry , 1967 .

[12]  Anurag S Rathore,et al.  Design of experiments applications in bioprocessing: Concepts and approach , 2014, Biotechnology progress.

[13]  Yu Ji,et al.  The simplex algorithm for the rapid identification of operating conditions during early bioprocess development: Case studies in FAb' precipitation and multimodal chromatography , 2011, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[14]  N. Titchener-Hooker,et al.  The hybrid experimental simplex algorithm--an alternative method for 'sweet spot' identification in early bioprocess development: case studies in ion exchange chromatography. , 2012, Analytica chimica acta.