The interface of policy research and the policy development process: challenges posed to the forestry community

Abstract Researchers are increasingly being forced to consider how their research findings can result in tangible impacts thereby presenting a considerable challenge to those seeking to achieve those impacts as a consequence of policy changes. The policy change process is subject to a bewildering array of social, economic and political influences, and policy decisions are taken largely independently from the actions of scientists and research institutes. The link between research and policy is often diffuse, and direct linkages between research and policy change are rare. To simply assume that conducting research on policies relating to forests and disseminating the findings will lead to changes in the policies themselves is unrealistically naive and grossly overestimates the role of knowledge acquisition in policy change processes. A role exists nevertheless. This paper examines theories and concepts that describe research's influence on policy, links these with literature and empirical findings on diffusion of innovations and technology transfer and concludes by presenting proven strategies to enhance the uptake and use of research generally and particularly in policy processes.

[1]  S. Boehmer-Christiansen.  Britain and the International Panel on climate change: The impacts of scientific advice on global warming part 1: Integrated policy analysis and the global dimension , 1995 .

[2]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[3]  J. W. Thomas,et al.  Evolving forestry and rural development beliefs at midpoint and close of the 20th century , 2001 .

[4]  J. Bauhus.  Silvicultural practices in Australian native State forests—An introduction , 1999 .

[5]  Paul V. Ellefson,et al.  Integrating science and policy development: case of the national research council and US national policy focused on non-federal forests , 2000 .

[6]  Andrew D Oxman,et al.  Closing the gap between research and practice : an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings , 2011 .

[7]  D. Kaimowitz,et al.  The influence of research and publications on conventional wisdom and policies affecting forests. , 2000 .

[8]  Boru Douthwaite,et al.  Enabling Innovation: A Practical Guide to Understanding and Fostering Technological Change , 2002 .

[9]  C. Jordan,et al.  Tropical Moist Forest Silviculture and Management: A History of Success and Failure , 1998 .

[10]  I. Hovland,et al.  The PRSP Initiative: Multilateral Policy Change and the Role of Research , 2003 .

[11]  P. Hall.  Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain , 1993 .

[12]  Paul A. Sabatier,et al.  Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Implementation Research: a Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis , 1986, Journal of Public Policy.

[13]  G. A. Bradshaw,et al.  Conservation Ecology: Uncertainty as Information: Narrowing the Science-policy Gap , 2008 .

[14]  R. Gullison,et al.  Poor regulatory capacity limits the ability of science to influence the management of mahogany , 2003 .

[15]  Julian Warner,et al.  Opinion: research assessment and citation analysis , 2000 .

[16]  D. Kaimowitz,et al.  Forestry research, innovation and impact in developing countries from economic efficiency to the broader public good , 2002 .

[17]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[18]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[19]  Richard W. Guldin,et al.  Forest science and forest policy in the Americas: building bridges to a sustainable future , 2003 .

[20]  M. Mintrom,et al.  Advocacy Coalitions, Policy Entrepreneurs, and Policy Change , 1996 .

[21]  P. Sabatier.  An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein , 1988 .