Determination of heat loss from the feet and insulation of the footwear.

This study compared the methods of determining the footwear insulation on human participants and the thermal foot model. Another purpose was to find the minimal number of measurement points on the human foot that is needed for insulation calculation. Bare foot was tested at 3 ambient temperatures on 6 participants. Three types of footwear were tested on 2 participants. The mean insulation for a bare foot obtained on the participant and model were similar. The insulation of warm footwear measured by the 2 methods was also similar. For thin footwear the insulation values from the participants were higher than those from the thermal model. The differences could be related to undefined physiological factors. Two points on foot can be enough to measure the insulation of footwear on human participants (r =.98). However, due to the big individual differences of humans, and good repeatability and simplicity of the thermal foot method, the latter should be preferred for testing.

[1]  I Holmér,et al.  A method for dynamic measurement of the resistance to dry heat exchange by footwear. , 1997, Applied ergonomics.

[2]  Ingvar Holmér,et al.  Effect of Sweating on Insulation of Footwear. , 1998, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[3]  Ingvar Holmér,et al.  Effect of Footwear Insulation on Thermal Responses in the Cold. , 1998, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[4]  Ducharme Mb,et al.  The effect of wave motion on dry suit insulation and the responses to cold water immersion. , 1998 .

[5]  C J Brooks,et al.  The effect of wave motion on dry suit insulation and the responses to cold water immersion. , 1998, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[6]  W R Santee,et al.  Biophysical evaluation of footwear for cold-weather climates. , 1988, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.