Load management at home: advantages and drawbacks of some ‘active demand side' options

The Supergen HiDEF (Highly Distributed Energy Future) project explores possibilities for decentralising five features of energy systems: resources, control, network infrastructure, participation and policy. This paper addresses issues of decentralised resources and participation (markets and commercial arrangements). It outlines some practicalities of an ‘active demand side’, supported by a brief overview of social and behavioural aspects of electricity use. Examples are derived from the international literature on behavioural aspects of energy use and residential load management programmes. Four potential active demand options are analysed in outline, in relation to customer involvement and likely enabling technologies. They are: overall demand reduction, static tariffs for peak reduction, dynamic tariffs for load management with variable supply, and continuous load-balancing through dynamic demand. Each of these can offer something to the utility; but what might it offer the customer, and what issues might it raise? The paper proposes development of a framework for evaluating ‘active demand’ options in terms of what they offer to small-scale end-users, to assist with planning for low-carbon energy transitions.

[1]  H. Dowlatabadi,et al.  Models of Decision Making and Residential Energy Use , 2007, Renewable Energy.

[2]  Yolande Strengers,et al.  Air-conditioning Australian households: The impact of dynamic peak pricing , 2010 .

[3]  M. Aune Energy comes home , 2007 .

[4]  Robin Roy,et al.  User-centred improvements to energy efficiency products and renewable energy systems: research on household adoption and use , 2008 .

[5]  Hom B. Rijal,et al.  Developing occupancy feedback from a prototype to improve housing production , 2010 .

[6]  Ian Richardson,et al.  Smart meter data: Balancing consumer privacy concerns with legitimate applications , 2012 .

[7]  Sarah C. Darby,et al.  Social learning and public policy: Lessons from an energy-conscious village , 2006 .

[8]  Sarah C. Darby,et al.  Social implications of residential demand response in cool temperate climates , 2012 .

[9]  Kerstin Sernhed,et al.  Turn Me On, Turn Me Off! Techno-Economic, Environmental and Social Aspects of Direct Load Management in Residential Houses , 2005 .

[10]  P. Reiss,et al.  What changes energy consumption? Prices and public pressures , 2008 .

[11]  Brenda Vale,et al.  Domestic energy use, lifestyles and POE: past lessons for current problems , 2010 .

[12]  Kirsten Gram-Hanssen,et al.  Consuming technologies - developing routines , 2008 .

[13]  Tim Jackson,et al.  The value of reducing distribution losses by domestic load-shifting: a network perspective , 2009 .

[14]  Horace Herring,et al.  Consumer adoption and use of household renewable energy technologies, Report DIG-10 , 2007 .

[15]  Kirsten Gram-Hanssen,et al.  Residential heat comfort practices: understanding users , 2010 .

[16]  Olof M. Jarvegren,et al.  Pacific Northwest GridWise™ Testbed Demonstration Projects; Part I. Olympic Peninsula Project , 2008 .

[17]  Harald Rohracher,et al.  User-led Innovations and Participation Processes: Lessons from Sustainable Energy Technologies , 2006 .

[18]  Jaap Jelsma,et al.  Innovating for Sustainability: Involving Users, Politics and Technology , 2003 .

[19]  M. Wolsink The research agenda on social acceptance of distributed generation in smart grids: Renewable as common pool resources , 2012 .

[20]  Hanne Sæle,et al.  Demand Response From Household Customers: Experiences From a Pilot Study in Norway , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[21]  Geoff Levermore,et al.  Consumer impacts on dividends from solar water heating , 2011 .

[22]  Loren Lutzenhiser,et al.  Economic Sociology and the Social Problem of Energy Inefficiency , 2007 .

[23]  H. Allcott,et al.  Rethinking Real Time Electricity Pricing , 2011 .