Understanding the resilience of mail-back survey methods: An analysis of 20years of change in response rates to national park surveys.

Coverage and response rate challenges facing telephone and internet surveys have encouraged scientists to reconsider mail data collection methods. Although response rates to telephone surveys have declined sharply in the last 20years, it is unclear how response rates to mail have fared during this time. This study analyzes 179 mail-back surveys of visitors to US National Parks from 1988 to 2007, which used virtually the same administration procedures throughout the period. Results show that response rates, based on only those who initially agreed to return a questionnaire, have remained at a high level with a 76% average while the number of questions and pages steadily increased. Despite this rise in response burden, rates have declined only moderately from about 80% in the late 1980s to about 70% more recently. The roles of additional contacts and survey salience in maintaining high response rates are examined. Results suggest that mail-back surveys for obtaining information from quasi-general public populations remain an effective data collection procedure.

[1]  Henk Roose,et al.  The Joint Effect of Topic Interest and Follow-Up Procedures on the Response in a Mail Questionnaire , 2007 .

[2]  T. L. Brown,et al.  Factors Affecting Response Rates to Natural Resource - Focused Mail Surveys: Empirical Evidence of Declining Rates Over Time , 2003 .

[3]  Aaron Smith,et al.  Home broadband 2013 , 2013 .

[4]  Don A. Dillman,et al.  Does a Probability-Based Household Panel Benefit from Assignment to Postal Response as an Alternative to Internet-Only? , 2008 .

[5]  Michael W. Link,et al.  A Comparison of Address-Based Sampling (ABS) Versus Random-Digit Dialing (RDD) for General Population Surveys , 2008 .

[6]  David L. Williams,et al.  Suppressor Variables in Multiple Regression/Correlation , 1992 .

[7]  A. H. Church.  ESTIMATING THE EFFECT OF INCENTIVES ON MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE RATES: A META-ANALYSIS , 1993 .

[8]  D. Dillman.  Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[9]  D. Dillman,et al.  EFFECTS OF QUESTIONNAIRE LENGTH, RESPONDENT-FRIENDLY DESIGN, AND A DIFFICULT QUESTION ON RESPONSE RATES FOR OCCUPANT-ADDRESSED CENSUS MAIL SURVEYS , 1993 .

[10]  Xitao Fan,et al.  Comparing response rates in e-mail and paper surveys: A meta-analysis , 2009 .

[11]  Morgan M. Millar,et al.  Improving Response To Web and Mixed-Mode Surveys , 2011 .

[12]  T. Heberlein,et al.  Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: A quantitative analysis of the published literature. , 1978 .

[13]  Don A. Dillman,et al.  Surveying the General Public over the Internet Using Address-Based Sampling and Mail Contact Procedures , 2011 .

[14]  J. Michael Brick,et al.  Address-Based Sampling for Subpopulation Surveys , 2011 .

[15]  Personal Delivery of Mail Questionnaires for Household Surveys: A Test of Four Retrieval Methods , 1999 .

[16]  D. Dillman,et al.  Increasing response to personally-delivered mail-back questionnaires. , 1995 .

[17]  Robert M. Groves,et al.  The Impact of Nonresponse Rates on Nonresponse Bias A Meta-Analysis , 2008 .

[18]  Michael A. Dimock,et al.  Gauging the Impact of Growing Nonresponse on Estimates from a National RDD Telephone Survey , 2006 .

[19]  James D. Wright,et al.  Needs assessment : theory and methods , 1990 .

[20]  Jolene D. Smyth,et al.  Using the Internet to Survey Small Towns and Communities: Limitations and Possibilities in the Early 21st Century , 2010 .

[21]  Edith D. de Leeuw,et al.  A comparison of nonresponse in mail, telephone, and face-to-face surveys , 1994 .