TEXTUAL AND INTER-TEXTUAL ANALYSES OF IRANIAN EFL UNDERGRADUATES’ TYPES OF ENGLISH READING TOWARDS DEVELOPING A CAREFUL READING FRAMEWORK

This study investigated textual and inter-textual reading of a group of Iranian EFL undergraduates’ careful English reading types. In this research, Khalifa and Weir’s (2009) reading framework was used to propose a more inclusive aspect of a careful reading framework and the reading construct for instructional and assessment goals. The participants of this study were B.A. students of English Translation at Shiraz Payame Noor University. To obtain the required data, a questionnaire and a careful reading test along with reading journals, interviews, and retrospective verbal protocols were used. The findings revealed that careful reading at the sentential and textual levels were seen to be practiced frequently by the participants. However, reading purposes and cognitive processes requiring integrating information from different texts, reading critically to establish and evaluate the authors’ position on a particular topic, building links across texts, judging the relatedness of texts, evaluating the writer’s ideas and comparing viewpoints were not seen as prevalent emerged reading patterns. The participants performed differently on tasks measuring different types of careful reading at different levels in a descending order of difficulty. In doing the tasks, although no statistically significant difference was found between the performance of males and females, they performed differently regarding their age and educational level differences. Subsequently, based on the outcomes, in the proposed careful reading framework, some new variables such as educational level, age, documents knowledge, better understanding and careful reading at multiple text level structures were added to Khalifa and Weir’s (2009) reading framework.

[1]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  Trust Matters: Examining the Role of Source Evaluation in Students' Construction of Meaning Within and Across Multiple Texts , 2009 .

[2]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Language Comprehension As Structure Building , 1990 .

[3]  Ronald P. Carver,et al.  Predicting reading level in grades 1 to 6 from listening level and decoding level: Testing theory relevant to the simple view of reading , 1998 .

[4]  Reza Abdi,et al.  The Effect of Using Hypertext Materials on Reading Comprehension Ability of EFL Learners , 2013 .

[5]  Cyril J. Weir,et al.  Reading in a Second Language: Process, Product and Practice , 1999 .

[6]  Steve Price,et al.  Construct validity in the IELTS academic reading test: a comparison of reading requirements in IELTS test items and in university study , 2011 .

[7]  W. Kintsch.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension : a construction-integration model , 1991 .

[8]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Structural Aspects of Constructing Meaning From Text , 2000 .

[9]  P. David Pearson.  Handbook of reading research. , 1990 .

[10]  Cyril J. Weir,et al.  Examining Reading: Research and Practice in Assessing Second Language Reading , 2009 .

[11]  R. Oostdam,et al.  Assessing reading comprehension in adolescent low achievers: Subskills identification and task specificity , 2013 .

[12]  Mohammad Nabi Karimi.  L2 multiple-documents comprehension: Exploring the contributions of L1 reading ability and strategic processing , 2015 .

[13]  Cyril J. Weir,et al.  Understanding and Developing Language Tests , 1994 .

[14]  P. Broek,et al.  The effects of reading purpose and working memory capacity on the processing of expository text. , 2002 .

[15]  M. A. Britt,et al.  Toward a theory of documents representation. , 1999 .

[16]  Elizabeth B. Bernhardt.  Reading Development in a Second Language: Theoretical, Empirical and Classroom Perspectives , 1991 .

[17]  Ronald P. Carver,et al.  Reading for One Second, One Minute, or One Year From the Perspective of Rauding Theory , 1997 .

[18]  S. Wineburg.  Historical Problem Solving: A Study of the Cognitive Processes Used in the Evaluation of Documentary and Pictorial Evidence , 1991 .

[19]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer.  Importance of text structure in everyday reading , 1999 .

[20]  Mohammad Nabi Karimi,et al.  EFL learners' text processing strategies across comprehension vs. integration reading task conditions , 2014 .

[21]  Keiichi Kobayashi,et al.  Strategic Use of Multiple Texts for the Evaluation of Arguments , 2010 .

[22]  K. Rayner,et al.  The psychology of reading , 1989 .

[23]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[24]  Gholamreza Hessamy,et al.  Construct Validity of Careful vs. Expeditious Reading Skills , 2013 .

[25]  C. Weir,et al.  A cognitive processing approach towards defining reading comprehension , 2008 .

[26]  Simone Aparecida Capellini,et al.  Reading comprehension intervention program for teachers from 3rd grade' students , 2015 .

[27]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Effects of Task Instruction and Personal Epistemology on the Understanding of Multiple Texts About Climate Change , 2009 .

[28]  Lucia Mason,et al.  Effects of Beliefs about Meaning Construction and Task Instructions on Interpretation of Narrative Text. , 2006 .

[29]  Jean-François Rouet,et al.  The Skills of Document Use: From Text Comprehension to Web-Based Learning , 2006 .

[30]  Paul van den Broek,et al.  The influence of reading purpose on inference generation and comprehension in reading. , 1999 .

[31]  Lia Plakans,et al.  The role of reading strategies in integrated L2 writing tasks , 2009 .

[32]  Roger Hawkey,et al.  The relationship between the academic reading construct as measured by IELTS and the reading experiences of students in their first year of study at a British university , 2009 .

[33]  Masoud Zoghi,et al.  Looking into EFL Reading Comprehension , 2010 .

[34]  Eric M. Anderman,et al.  Changes in Achievement Goal Orientations, Perceived Academic Competence, and Grades across the Transition to Middle-Level Schools , 1997, Contemporary educational psychology.

[35]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Does the Influence of Reading Purpose on Reports of Strategic Text Processing Depend on Students' Topic Knowledge? , 2004 .

[36]  A. Ryan,et al.  Achievement Goals and Achievement during Early Adolescence: Examining Time-Varying Predictor and Outcome Variables in Growth-Curve Analysis. , 2008 .

[37]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Learning to Construct and Integrate. , 2005 .

[38]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  FACILITATING TEXTUAL INTEGRATION WITH MACRO-STRUCTURE FOCUSING TASKS , 2004 .

[39]  G. B. Katalayi,et al.  Careful Reading versus Expeditious Reading: Investigating the Construct Validity of a Multiple-choice Reading Test , 2013 .

[40]  Dr K. Sarojani Devi Krishnan.  CAREFUL VERSUS EXPEDITIOUS READING: THE CASE OF THE IELTS READING TEST , 2011 .

[41]  K. E. Barron,et al.  Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. , 2002 .

[42]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[43]  Patricia L. Carrell,et al.  METACOGNITIVE AWARENESS AND SECOND LANGUAGE READING , 1989 .

[44]  William Grabe,et al.  Teaching and Researching Reading , 2019 .

[45]  Øistein Anmarkrud,et al.  Multiple-documents literacy: Strategic processing, source awareness, and argumentation when reading multiple conflicting documents , 2014 .

[46]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Sentences, individual differences, and multiple texts: Three issues in text comprehension , 1997 .

[47]  Robert F. Lorch,et al.  The effects of readers’ goals on inference generation and memory for texts , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[48]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition : Psychological and Biological Models , 1986 .

[49]  Mary Lee Field.  A Psycholinguistic Model of the Chinese ESL Reader. , 1984 .