Haptic probing: Perceiving the length of a probe and the distance of a surface probed

Knowing about the properties of objects by wielding them and knowing about the distances of surfaces by striking them with objects as probes are examples of dynamic or effortful touch. Six experiments focused on the invariant mechanical parameters that couple the time-varying states (displacements, velocities) of hand-held rods to the time-varying torques and forces imposed upon them by wielding and probing. There were three major conclusions. First, when a probe is wielded without contact, perceived probe length is a function of the probe’s rotational inertia; however, with contact, perceived probe length is affected by the rotational inertia and the distance of the point of contact from the probe’s center of percussion. Second, when a surface is struck with a probe, perceived surface distance is affected by the probe’s rotational inertia and the angle of inclination of the probe at contact. Third, under seemingly identical conditions of probing, either probe length or surface distance can be perceived selectively without confusion. Results were discussed in terms of haptic information, haptic attention, and the dynamics of probing.

[1]  M. Turvey,et al.  An ecological analysis of knowing by wielding. , 1989, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  Joseph Jastrow,et al.  THE PERCEPTION OF SPACE BY DISPARATE SENSES , 1886 .

[4]  B. Jones,et al.  Psychological Analyses of Haptic and Haptic-Visual Judgements of Extent , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[5]  M T Turvey,et al.  Attentionally splitting the mass distribution of hand-held rods , 1991, Perception & Psychophysics.

[6]  R. P. Kelvin,et al.  Discrimination of Length by Sight and Touch , 1958 .

[7]  H. Solomon,et al.  Movement-produced invariants in haptic explorations: An example of a self-organizing, information-driven, intentional system , 1988 .

[8]  J. Gibson.  The concept of the stimulus in psychology. , 1960 .

[9]  Robert Rosen,et al.  Similarity and dissimilarity: A partial overview , 1988 .

[10]  Robert Teghtsoonian,et al.  Seen and felt length , 1965 .

[11]  M T Turvey,et al.  Role of the inertia tensor in perceiving object orientation by dynamic touch. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  R. P. Kelvin.  Discrimination of Size by Sight and Tough , 1954 .

[13]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Exterospecific component of the motion parallax field. , 1981, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[14]  M. Teghtsoonian,et al.  Two varieties of perceived length , 1970 .

[15]  M T Turvey,et al.  On the time allometry of co-ordinated rhythmic movements. , 1988, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  M T Turvey,et al.  Can shape be perceived by dynamic touch? , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Four Ways to Reject Directed Perception , 1991 .

[18]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Gravitational and Muscular Variables in Perceiving Rod Extent by Wielding , 1989 .

[19]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Effortful touch with minimal movement , 1992 .

[20]  W. James,et al.  The Principles of Psychology. , 1983 .

[21]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Links Between Active Perception and the Control of Action , 1990 .

[22]  Allen M. Waxman,et al.  Surface Structure and Three-Dimensional Motion from Image Flow Kinematics , 1985 .

[23]  M. Turvey,et al.  Perceiving Object Width by Grasping , 1990 .

[24]  Donald E. Broadbent,et al.  Decision and stress , 1971 .

[25]  W. M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Manual discrimination and identification of length by the finger-span method , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Perceiving the Lengths of Rods That are Held But Not Wielded , 1990 .

[27]  W. Simpson,et al.  “Feeling” with a Stick , 1968, Perceptual and motor skills.

[28]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Perception with an eye for motion , 1986 .

[29]  Allen Allport,et al.  Visual attention , 1989 .

[30]  J. Gibson.  The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .

[31]  J. Gibson.  Observations on active touch. , 1962, Psychological review.

[32]  M T Turvey,et al.  Haptically perceiving the distances reachable with hand-held objects. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  W. Epstein,et al.  Percept—Percept Couplings , 1982, Perception.

[34]  D. Katz.  The World of Touch , 1989 .

[35]  M T Turvey,et al.  Perceiving the vertical distances of surfaces by means of a hand-held probe. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  J. W. Humberston.  Classical mechanics , 1980, Nature.

[37]  Simpson Dc,et al.  The functioning hand, the human advantage. , 1976 .

[38]  W. Epstein.  What are the prospects for a higher-order stimulus theory of perception? , 1977, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[39]  M T Turvey,et al.  Perceiving aperture size by striking. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Perceiving extents of rods by wielding: haptic diagonalization and decomposition of the inertia tensor. , 1989 .

[41]  G. Bingham,et al.  Hefting for a maximum distance throw: a smart perceptual mechanism. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.