Patient Decision Aids to Support Clinical Decision Making: Evaluating the Decision or the Outcomes of the Decision

Decision aids (DAs) are tools to support patients make informed health decisions with their practitioner. They aim to improve patient knowledge of options, incorporate patient preferences and values, and increase patient involvement in health decision making. Increasingly, the debate about DAs concerns how they should be implemented in practice, with the view that DAs are superior to usual clinical care in facilitating health decisions. The authors challenge this view and suggest that DA research has focused on measures of decision process, leaving the effects on the outcome of the decision relatively unknown. It is still unclear in which conditions DAs are better for patient health and well-being than clinician-led decisions. The authors present a new randomized design to examine the effects of DA-supported patient choice on patient-centered outcomes to identify where DAs are best implemented in clinical practice. In this design, patients are randomized to 1 of 4 arms: intervention A, intervention B, choice of either intervention supported by a clinician, or choice of either intervention supported by a decision aid. Health and quality of life measured over the long term are presented as the primary outcomes. The authors propose that this design will allow the proper assessment of different modes of decision making.

[1]  S. Folkman,et al.  Stress, appraisal, and coping , 1974 .

[2]  J. Christensen-Szalanski.  Discount Functions and the Measurement of Patients' Values , 1984, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[3]  S. Folkman,et al.  Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York, NY: Springer; , 1984 .

[4]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Expanding patient involvement in care. Effects on patient outcomes. , 1985, Annals of internal medicine.

[5]  J. Baron,et al.  Outcome bias in decision evaluation. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  G. Rücker,et al.  A two-stage trial design for testing treatment, self-selection and treatment preference effects. , 1989, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Assessing the Effects of Physician-Patient Interactions on the Outcomes of Chronic Disease , 1989, Medical care.

[8]  R. Croyle,et al.  Coping with health threat: social influence processes in reactions to medical test results. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  K L Posner,et al.  Effect of outcome on physician judgments of appropriateness of care. , 1991, JAMA.

[10]  O. Svenson.  Differentiation and consolidation theory of human decision making: A frame of reference for the study of pre- and post-decision processes , 1992 .

[11]  Ola Svenson,et al.  Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making , 1993 .

[12]  J. Shanteau,et al.  Environmental Stressor Effects on Creativity and Decision Making , 1993 .

[13]  W. Silverman.  Patients' preferences and randomised trials , 1994, The Lancet.

[14]  C. Bradley.  Patients' preferences and randomised trials. , 1996, Lancet.

[15]  L. Degner,et al.  Empowerment of men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer. , 1997, Cancer nursing.

[16]  C. Charles,et al.  Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[17]  Floyd J. Fowler,et al.  A Randomized Trial of a Multimedia Shared Decision-Making Program for Men Facing a Treatment Decision for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia , 1997 .

[18]  Lisa M. Schwartz,et al.  The Role of Numeracy in Understanding the Benefit of Screening Mammography , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[19]  V. Entwistle,et al.  Evaluating Interventions to Promote Patient Involvement in Decision-Making: By What Criteria Should Effectiveness be Judged? , 1998, Journal of health services research & policy.

[20]  M. Starling,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of information‐giving to patients referred for coronary angiography: effects on outcomes of care , 1998, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[21]  J. Pugh,et al.  Patient Choice in Diabetes Education Curriculum: Nutritional versus standard content for type 2 diabetes , 1998, Diabetes Care.

[22]  V. Entwistle,et al.  Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review , 1999, BMJ.

[23]  Z. Jocic,et al.  The role of client choice and target selection in self-management therapy for depression in older adults. , 1999, Psychology and aging.

[24]  A. Garratt,et al.  TWO-YEAR FOLLOW UP OF WOMEN RANDOMISED TO MEDICAL MANAGEMENT OR TRANSCERVICAL RESECTION OF THE ENDOMETRIUM FOR HEAVY MENSTRUAL LOSS : CLINICAL AND QUA LITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES , 1999 .

[25]  C. Charles,et al.  Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[26]  A. Grant,et al.  Five‐year follow up of women randomised to medical management or transcervical resection of the endometrium for heavy menstrual loss: clinical and quality of life outcomes , 1999 .

[27]  D. Parkin,et al.  Comparison of microwave endometrial ablation and transcervical resection of the endometrium for treatment of heavy menstrual loss: a randomised trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[28]  G. Bugg.  Two‐year follow up of women randomised to medical management or transcervical resection of the endometrium for heavy menstrual loss: clinical and quality of life outcomes , 1999, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[29]  R A Deyo,et al.  Involving Patients in Clinical Decisions: Impact of an Interactive Video Program on Use of Back Surgery , 2000, Medical care.

[30]  P. Ubel.  Is Information Always a Good Thing?: Helping Patients Make “Good” Decisions , 2002, Medical care.

[31]  A. Coulter.  Patient information and shared decision-making in cancer care , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.

[32]  Karen R. Sepucha,et al.  Extending decision support: preparation and implementation. , 2003, Patient education and counseling.

[33]  A. D. Kennedy.  On what basis should the effectiveness of decision aids be judged? , 2003, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[34]  J. A. Dodge,et al.  The role of choice in health education intervention trials: a review and case study. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[35]  R. Thomson,et al.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[36]  W. Godolphin.  The role of risk communication in shared decision making , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[37]  Deb Feldman-Stewart,et al.  Challenges for designing and implementing decision aids. , 2004, Patient education and counseling.

[38]  Laurence B McCullough,et al.  A Typology of Shared Decision Making, Informed Consent, and Simple Consent , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[39]  C. Charles,et al.  Treatment decision aids: conceptual issues and future directions , 2005, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[40]  Adriaan Visser,et al.  Implementing shared decision making in diverse health care systems: the role of patient decision aids. , 2005, Patient education and counseling.

[41]  P. Ubel,et al.  Rethinking the Objectives of Decision Aids: A Call for Conceptual Clarity , 2007, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[42]  George Tomlinson,et al.  Randomized, controlled trial of an interactive videodisc decision aid for patients with ischemic heart disease , 2000, Journal of General Internal Medicine.