EBF3PanelOpt: An optimization framework for curvilinear blade-stiffened panels

A new framework, EBF3PanelOpt, is being developed for design and optimization of complex, multifunctional, aircraft structural concepts like pressurized non-circular fuselage structures to be used in hybrid wing/body vehicles that are subjected to complex structural loading cases. This tool can be used to integrate materials and structural concepts to exploit emerging additive manufacturing processes that offer the ability to efficiently fabricate complex structural configurations. Commercial software packages, MD-Patran (geometry modeling and mesh generation), MD-Nastran (Finite Element Analysis), are integrated in the EBF3PanelOpt framework using Python programming environment to design stiffened panels with curvilinear stiffeners. Typically, these panels experience multiple loading conditions during the operations of these vehicles. EBF3PanelOpt has the capability to optimize flat/curved multi-sided panels with straight/curved edges having curvilinear, blade-type stiffeners under multiple loading conditions. The mass of the panel is minimized subjected to constraints on buckling, von Mises stress, and crippling or local failure of the stiffener using global optimization techniques or gradient based optimization techniques. The panel/stiffener geometry is parametrized using design variables that include variables for orientation and shape of the stiffeners, the thicknesses and height of the stiffeners, and the plate thickness. The plate can have uniform thickness or non-uniform thicknesses for the pockets created by the stiffeners. During optimization, constraints can be applied for each of the loading conditions by aggregating all the responses using Kreisselmeir–Steinhauser criteria or using worst response amongst all the responses or applying all the constraints. Initially, the flat rectangular panel is optimized for the single load-case to study the effectiveness of the panel thickness option. Then, the optimization of flat rectangular and cylindrical panels is carried out for three sample load cases of practical interest. This paper discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed constraints' application.

[1]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  An adaptive approach to constraint aggregation using adjoint sensitivity analysis , 2007 .

[2]  Jing Li,et al.  Optimal Design of Unitized Panels with Curvilinear Stiffeners , 2005 .

[3]  Kenneth Cooper,et al.  Free Form Fabrication in Space , 2004 .

[4]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Preliminary design optimization of stiffened panels using approximate analysis models , 2003 .

[5]  M. C. Niu,et al.  Airframe Stress Analysis and Sizing , 2011 .

[6]  Alex Velicki,et al.  Future of Flight Vehicle Structures (2000 to 2023) , 2004 .

[7]  W. J. Stroud,et al.  Buckling loads of stiffened panels subjected to combined longitudinal compression and shear: Results obtained with PASCO, EAL, and STAGS computer programs , 1984 .

[8]  Jing Li,et al.  Optimal Design of Unitized Structures Using Response Surface Approaches , 2010 .

[9]  Osama K. Bedair,et al.  Influence of stiffener location on the stability of stiffened plates under compression and in-plane bending , 1997 .

[10]  David Bushnell,et al.  Theoretical basis of the PANDA computer program for preliminary design of stiffened panels under combined in-plane loads , 1987 .

[11]  Karen M. Taminger,et al.  Solid Freeform Fabrication: An Enabling Technology for Future Space Missions , 2002 .

[12]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 2002 .

[13]  W. Jefferson Stroud,et al.  General Panel Sizing Computer Code and Its Application to Composite Structural Panels , 1979 .

[14]  R. Butler,et al.  Optimum design and evaluation of stiffened panels with practical loading , 1994 .

[15]  Karen M. Taminger,et al.  Electron Beam Freeform Fabrication: A Rapid Metal Deposition Process , 2003 .

[16]  Zafer Gürdal,et al.  Optimal design of geodesically stiffened composite cylindrical shells , 1992 .

[17]  Alain Remouchamps,et al.  Optimization methods for advanced design of aircraft panels: a comparison , 2010 .

[18]  Craig S. Collier,et al.  Composite, Grid-Stiffened Panel Design for Post Buckling Using Hypersizer (Trademark) , 2001 .

[19]  Wu K. Chauncey,et al.  Sensitivity of Lumped Constraints Using the Adjoint Method , 1999 .

[20]  Christopher York,et al.  Aircraft wing panel buckling analysis: efficiency by approximations , 1998 .

[21]  Richard G. Pettit,et al.  Validated Feasibility Study of Integrally Stiffened Metallic Fuselage Panels for Reducing Manufacturing Costs , 2000 .

[22]  G. Kreisselmeier,et al.  SYSTEMATIC CONTROL DESIGN BY OPTIMIZING A VECTOR PERFORMANCE INDEX , 1979 .