Comparing perception of signals in different modalities during the cycling task: A field study

Abstract Cyclists are considered to be amongst the most vulnerable road users and the number of cyclists involved in crashes is increasing. One possibility to improve bicycle safety is the implementation of assistance systems, for instance by providing the information needed to avoid critical situations. However, it is not known how and what kind of signals can reliably be transmitted to cyclists, in particular as warnings. This study has the objective to investigate which signal type dependent of the modality and the route type can be perceived during the cycling task. Therefore, we conducted a semi-naturalistic cycling study with 56 participants where a 10 km long, pre-defined route was individually cycled while 36 signals (visual, auditory and vibro-tactile) were transmitted. The participants signalled the perception of a signal by pressing a button. Response rates differed significantly between signal modalities. While auditory signals performed best closely followed by vibro-tactile signals, visual signals were frequently missed. The route type had an effect on the perception of the signals. The influence of the route segments with haptic interference was not expected to be this large on the perception of vibro-tactile signals. The obtained results indicate how and in which situations the different modalities are suited to transmit information to cyclists.

[1]  Lee Skrypchuk,et al.  The comparison of auditory, tactile, and multimodal warnings for the effective communication of unexpected events during an automated driving scenario , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[2]  Marjan Hagenzieker,et al.  Auditory localisation of conventional and electric cars: Laboratory results and implications for cycling safety , 2016 .

[3]  Michael S. Wogalter,et al.  A three-stage model summarizes product warning and environmental sign research , 2014 .

[4]  Stuart Newstead,et al.  Naturalistic cycling study: identifying risk factors for on-road commuter cyclists. , 2010, Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference.

[5]  Carryl L. Baldwin,et al.  Equating Perceived Urgency Across Auditory, Visual, and Tactile Signals , 2012 .

[6]  Brian Casey Langford,et al.  Risky riding: Naturalistic methods comparing safety behavior from conventional bicycle riders and electric bike riders. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Tibor Petzoldt,et al.  Traffic conflicts and their contextual factors when riding conventional vs. electric bicycles , 2017 .

[8]  C. Engbers,et al.  The acceptance of a prototype rear-view assistant for older cyclists: Two modalities of warnings compared , 2016 .

[9]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Behavioural changes in drivers experiencing highly-automated vehicle control in varying traffic conditions , 2013 .

[10]  Monica N. Lees,et al.  The influence of distraction and driving context on driver response to imperfect collision warning systems , 2007, Ergonomics.

[11]  Katja Kircher,et al.  Bicyclists’ Visual Strategies When Conducting Self-Paced Vs. System-Paced Smartphone Tasks in Traffic , 2016 .

[12]  Anna Niska,et al.  An international review of the frequency of single-bicycle crashes (SBCs) and their relation to bicycle modal share , 2014, Injury Prevention.

[13]  U Björnstig,et al.  Road characteristics and bicycle accidents , 1996, Scandinavian journal of social medicine.

[14]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Multiple Resources and Mental Workload , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[15]  M. Sivak The Information That Drivers Use: Is it Indeed 90% Visual? , 1996, Perception.

[16]  Marco Dozza,et al.  Using naturalistic data to assess e-cyclist behavior , 2016 .

[17]  Paul Schepers,et al.  What do cyclists need to see to avoid single-bicycle crashes? , 2011, Ergonomics.

[18]  Daniel Oberfeld,et al.  Evaluating the robustness of repeated measures analyses: The case of small sample sizes and nonnormal data , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.

[19]  Michiel Christoph,et al.  Speed choice and mental workload of elderly cyclists on e-bikes in simple and complex traffic situations: a field experiment. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  Polly Dalton,et al.  Out of Touch? Visual Load Induces Inattentional Numbness , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  Marco Dozza,et al.  Safety–Critical Events in Everyday Cycling – Interviews with Bicyclists and Video Annotation of Safety–Critical Events in a Naturalistic Cycling Study , 2015 .

[22]  Víctor Marín Puchades,et al.  Evaluation of User Behavior and Acceptance of an On-Bike System , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[23]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Take-over again: Investigating multimodal and directional TORs to get the driver back into the loop. , 2017, Applied ergonomics.