Hysteretic model for steel energy dissipation devices and evaluation of a minimal-damage seismic design approach for steel buildings

This paper evaluates an alternative seismic design approach for steel structures that concentrates damage in easy-to-replace steel energy dissipation devices and protects the main structural members from yielding with capacity design rules. This approach can reduce damage repair costs and downtime, and, can be further enhanced by using rate-dependent dampers in parallel to steel devices to achieve drift reduction and protection of drift-sensitive non-structural elements. A model for steel energy dissipation devices is proposed and calibrated against experimental results. In particular, the Bouc-Wen model is modified to capture the combined kinematic and isotropic hardening in the hysteresis of steel devices. The model is found able to accurately predict the experimentally obtained hysteresis and is implemented in the OpenSees software for use in seismic response analysis. A simplified seismic design procedure is proposed and used to design a prototype steel building equipped with steel devices and viscous dampers according to explicitly defined minimal-damage performance objectives. Seismic analyses results indicate the accuracy of the design procedure and confirm that the building is able to achieve immediate occupancy under the design seismic action and rapid return to occupancy under the maximum considered seismic action. The same building is designed as a conventional steel MRF according to EC8. Results of seismic analyses show that repair of damage in the main structural members of the conventional MRF may not be financially viable in the aftermath of the design and maximum considered earthquakes.

[1]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of a Large-Scale Buckling-Restrained Braced Frame , 2007 .

[2]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Equivalent Lateral Force and Modal Analysis Procedures of the 2000 NEHRP Provisions for Buildings with Damping Systems , 2003 .

[3]  Yi Min Xie,et al.  Shape optimization of metallic yielding devices for passive mitigation of seismic energy , 2010 .

[4]  José I. Restrepo,et al.  Shaking Table Tests of a Four-Story Miniature Steel Building— Model Validation , 2006 .

[5]  Keh‐Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Design of Steel Triangular Plate Energy Absorbers for Seismic-Resistant Construction , 1993 .

[6]  Leandro Morillas,et al.  A study on using wide‐flange section web under out‐of‐plane flexure for passive energy dissipation , 2011 .

[7]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Experimental evaluation of the seismic performance of steel MRFs with compressed elastomer dampers using large-scale real-time hybrid simulation , 2011 .

[8]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Component Testing, Seismic Evaluation and Characterization of Buckling-Restrained Braces , 2004 .

[9]  Federico M. Mazzolani,et al.  Hysteretic behaviour of bracing‐type pure aluminium shear panels by experimental tests , 2011 .

[10]  M. V. Sivaselvan,et al.  Hysteretic models for deteriorating inelastic structures , 2000 .

[11]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Seismic Testing of Steel Plate Energy Dissipation Devices , 1991 .

[12]  Theodore L. Karavasilis,et al.  Seismic structural and non-structural performance evaluation of highly damped self-centering and conventional systems , 2011 .

[13]  Ulf Wickström,et al.  Comments on calculation of temperature in fire-exposed bare steel structures in prEN 1993-1-2: Eurocode 3—design of steel structures—Part 1–2: general rules—structural fire design , 2005 .

[14]  William T. Holmes,et al.  The 1997 NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures , 2000 .

[15]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  Strain-Hardening Behavior of Shear Panels Made of Low-Yield Steel. I: Test , 1995 .

[16]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Seismic Response and Performance of Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames , 2007 .

[17]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Seismic design and evaluation of steel MRFs with compressed elastomer dampers , 2009 .

[18]  Yi-Kwei Wen,et al.  Evaluation of Pre-Northridge Low-Rise Steel Buildings. I: Modeling , 2000 .

[19]  D. A. Nethercot,et al.  Designer's guide to EN 1993-1-1 : Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures : General Rules and Rules for Buildings /L. Gardner and D. A. Nethercot , 2005 .

[20]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Seismic design and evaluation of steel moment‐resisting frames with compressed elastomer dampers , 2012 .

[21]  Faris Albermani,et al.  Experimental study of steel slit damper for passive energy dissipation , 2008 .

[22]  Michael C. Constantinou,et al.  Response of Nonstructural Components in Structures with Damping Systems , 2006 .

[23]  Michel Bruneau,et al.  Experimental Response of Buildings Designed with Metallic Structural Fuses. II , 2009 .

[24]  Johnny Sun,et al.  Development of Ground Motion Time Histories for Phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC Steel Project , 1997 .

[25]  Y. Wen Method for Random Vibration of Hysteretic Systems , 1976 .

[26]  Michel Bruneau,et al.  Effect of Supplemental Viscous Damping on the Seismic Response of Structural Systems with Metallic Dampers , 2007 .

[27]  Armen Der Kiureghian,et al.  Generalized Bouc-Wen model for highly asymmetric hysteresis , 2006 .

[28]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Energy dissipation systems for seismic applications: Current practice and recent developments , 2008 .

[29]  Luís Simões da Silva,et al.  Design of Steel Structures: Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures, Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings , 2010 .