Incidence and Predictors of Subsequent Surgery After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A 6-Year Follow-up Study

Background: The cause of subsequent surgery after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction varies, but if risk factors for specific subsequent surgical procedures can be identified, we can better understand which patients are at greatest risk. Purpose: To report the incidence and types of subsequent surgery that occurred in a cohort of patients 6 years after their index ACL reconstruction and to identify which variables were associated with the incidence of patients undergoing subsequent surgery after their index ACL reconstruction. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients completed a questionnaire before their index ACL surgery and were followed up at 2 and 6 years. Patients were contacted to determine whether any underwent additional surgery since baseline. Operative reports were obtained, and all surgical procedures were categorized and recorded. Logistic regression models were constructed to predict which patient demographic and surgical variables were associated with the incidence of undergoing subsequent surgery after their index ACL reconstruction. Results: The cohort consisted of 3276 patients (56.3% male) with a median age of 23 years. A 6-year follow-up was obtained on 91.5% (2999/3276) with regard to information on the incidence and frequency of subsequent surgery. Overall, 20.4% (612/2999) of the cohort was documented to have undergone at least 1 subsequent surgery on the ipsilateral knee 6 years after their index ACL reconstruction. The most common subsequent surgical procedures were related to the meniscus (11.9%), revision ACL reconstruction (7.5%), loss of motion (7.8%), and articular cartilage (6.7%). Significant risk factors for incurring subsequent meniscus-related surgery were having a medial meniscal repair at the time of index surgery, reconstruction with a hamstring autograft or allograft, higher baseline Marx activity level, younger age, and cessation of smoking. Significant predictors of undergoing subsequent surgery involving articular cartilage were higher body mass index, higher Marx activity level, reconstruction with a hamstring autograft or allograft, meniscal repair at the time of index surgery, or a grade 3/4 articular cartilage abnormality classified at the time of index ACL reconstruction. Risk factors for incurring subsequent surgery for loss of motion were younger age, female sex, low baseline Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score symptom subscore, and reconstruction with a soft tissue allograft. Conclusion: These findings can be used to identify patients who are at the greatest risk of incurring subsequent surgery after ACL reconstruction.

[1]  R. Mascarenhas,et al.  Subsequent Surgery for Loss of Motion After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Does Not Influence Function at 2 Years: A Matched Case-Control Analysis , 2019, The American journal of sports medicine.

[2]  T. Ganley,et al.  Risk Factors for Concomitant Collateral Ligament Injuries in Children and Adolescents With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears , 2018, Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine.

[3]  Russell A. Reeves,et al.  Higher BMI predicts additional surgery at the time of ACL reconstruction , 2018, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[4]  J. Xerogeanes,et al.  Risk Factors for Manipulation Under Anesthesia and/or Lysis of Adhesions After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2018, Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine.

[5]  L. Engebretsen,et al.  Effect of Concomitant Cartilage Lesions on Patient-Reported Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Nationwide Cohort Study From Norway and Sweden of 8470 Patients With 5-Year Follow-up , 2018, Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine.

[6]  Henry T. Shu,et al.  Predictors of Knee Arthrofibrosis and Outcomes after Arthroscopic Lysis of Adhesions following Ligamentous Reconstruction: A Retrospective Case–Control Study with Over Two Years' Average Follow-Up , 2018, The Journal of Knee Surgery.

[7]  K. Webster,et al.  Medial meniscal and chondral pathology at the time of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction results in inferior mid-term patient-reported outcomes , 2018, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[8]  Alan L. Zhang,et al.  Subsequent Surgery After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Rates and Risk Factors From a Multicenter Cohort , 2016, The American journal of sports medicine.

[9]  Kate E. Webster,et al.  Exploring the High Reinjury Rate in Younger Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2016, The American journal of sports medicine.

[10]  L. Salmon,et al.  Fifteen-Year Survival of Endoscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Aged 18 Years and Younger , 2015, The American journal of sports medicine.

[11]  H. Haro,et al.  Meniscal tears associated with anterior cruciate ligament injury , 2015, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[12]  C. Kaeding,et al.  Risk Factors and Predictors of Subsequent ACL Injury in Either Knee After ACL Reconstruction , 2015, The American journal of sports medicine.

[13]  M. Inacio,et al.  Risk Factors of Subsequent Operations After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2014, The American journal of sports medicine.

[14]  W. Dunn,et al.  The Rate of Subsequent Surgery and Predictors After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2013, The American journal of sports medicine.

[15]  L. Engebretsen,et al.  Intraoperative findings and procedures in culturally and geographically different patient and surgeon populations , 2012, Acta orthopaedica.

[16]  Benedict U. Nwachukwu,et al.  Arthrofibrosis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Children and Adolescents , 2011, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[17]  Kurt P. Spindler,et al.  Allograft Versus Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2011, Sports health.

[18]  Stephen Lyman,et al.  Epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: trends, readmissions, and subsequent knee surgery. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  K. Shelbourne,et al.  Incidence of Subsequent Injury to Either Knee within 5 Years after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Patellar Tendon Autograft , 2009, The American journal of sports medicine.

[20]  D. Saris,et al.  Additional surgery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: can we improve technical aspects of the initial procedure? , 2008, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[21]  B. P. Smith,et al.  Cartilage injuries: a review of 31,516 knee arthroscopies. , 1997, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[22]  R. E. Outerbridge The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. , 1961, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.