Design, User Experience, and Usability: Technological Contexts

This paper presents the results of an experimental study that compared the usability of four different input methods in the context of smart phones with touch screen property. Twenty users were asked to fill in a questionnaire with four different input methods which were radio button, text field, spinner and button. Time required to fill in the questionnaire and the errors occurred were recorded. Overall, radio button was found to be the fastest by causing no error while text field was found to be the slowest input method and more error prone. In addition, participants were asked about their perceived performance before and after filling in the questionnaire. These results were compared with their actual performance. Most of the users could not predict their performance before use and many of the participants still could not make correct predictions about their own performance after use.

[1]  Andrew Vande Moere,et al.  The Effect of Aesthetic on the Usability of Data Visualization , 2007, 2007 11th International Conference Information Visualization (IV '07).

[2]  Amanda Lee Hughes,et al.  In search of the bigger picture: The emergent role of on-line photo sharing in times of disaster , 2008 .

[3]  Lars T. Boenke,et al.  Stimulus duration influences perceived simultaneity in audiovisual temporal-order judgment , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  V. Vesna Database Aesthetics: Art in the Age of Information Overflow , 2007 .

[5]  J. Müsseler,et al.  Ventriloquism and the nature of the unity assumption , 1999 .

[6]  Gary Klein,et al.  User and developer common knowledge: Effect on the success of information system development projects , 2009 .

[7]  Martin C. Maguire,et al.  Methods to support human-centred design , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[8]  Charles Spence,et al.  Multisensory temporal order judgments: the role of hemispheric redundancy. , 2003, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[9]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  User experience - a research agenda , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[10]  J R Simon,et al.  Effects of an irrelevant auditory stimulus on visual choice reaction time. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  Wei Fan,et al.  Mining big data: current status, and forecast to the future , 2013, SKDD.

[12]  Virpi Roto,et al.  Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach , 2009, CHI.

[13]  R S Nickerson,et al.  Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: energy summation or preparation enhancement? , 1973, Psychological review.

[14]  M HERSHENSON,et al.  Reaction time as a measure of intersensory facilitation. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  Helen C. Purchase,et al.  Metrics for Graph Drawing Aesthetics , 2002, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..

[16]  Jörg Lewald,et al.  Spatio-temporal constraints for auditory–visual integration , 2001, Behavioural Brain Research.

[17]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Interactions with big data analytics , 2012, INTR.

[18]  Nigel Bevan,et al.  What is the difference between the purpose of usability and user experience evaluation methods , 2009 .

[19]  Béatrice de Gelder,et al.  A Visual Influence in the Discrimination of Auditory Location , 1998, AVSP.

[20]  Yi-Chuan Chen,et al.  Catch the moment: multisensory enhancement of rapid visual events by sound , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  John T. Stasko,et al.  An evaluation of space-filling information visualizations for depicting hierarchical structures , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[22]  F. Rösler,et al.  Speech processing activates visual cortex in congenitally blind humans , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.

[23]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Involuntary orienting to sound improves visual perception , 2000, Nature.

[24]  Mor Naaman,et al.  How flickr helps us make sense of the world: context and content in community-contributed media collections , 2007, ACM Multimedia.

[25]  C. Umilta,et al.  How automatic are audiovisual links in exogenous spatial attention? , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  M. Posner,et al.  Visual dominance: an information-processing account of its origins and significance. , 1976, Psychological review.

[27]  de Gelder Sound Enhances Visual Perception: Cross-Modal Effects of Auditory Organization on Vision , 2001 .

[28]  P. Bertelson,et al.  Cross-modal bias and perceptual fusion with auditory-visual spatial discordance , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  Roelof van Zwol,et al.  Flickr tag recommendation based on collective knowledge , 2008, WWW.

[30]  C. Spence,et al.  Audiovisual temporal order judgments , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  Thorsten Mühlhausen,et al.  Operational and Environmental Assessment of Electric Taxi Based on Fast-Time Simulation , 2013 .

[32]  T. Vision Open Data and the Social Contract of Scientific Publishing , 2010 .

[33]  J. Driver,et al.  Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial orienting , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  Virpi Roto,et al.  User experience evaluation methods: current state and development needs , 2010, NordiCHI.

[35]  Mário J. Silva,et al.  Automatic creation of a reference corpus for political opinion mining in user-generated content , 2009, TSA@CIKM.

[36]  D. Freides,et al.  Human information processing and sensory modality: cross-modal functions, information complexity, memory, and deficit. , 1974, Psychological bulletin.

[37]  Takeo Watanabe,et al.  Specificity of auditory-guided visual perceptual learning suggests crossmodal plasticity in early visual cortex , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  P. Bertelson,et al.  The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of deliberate visual attention , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  Manuel S. Lima,et al.  Aesthetics in Information Visualization , 2009 .

[40]  O. Neumann,et al.  Timing of perception and perception of time , 2004 .

[41]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Growth of the flickr social network , 2008, WOSN '08.

[42]  Andrew Vande Moere,et al.  Towards a Model of Information Aesthetics in Information Visualization , 2007, 2007 11th International Conference Information Visualization (IV '07).

[43]  Daniel Senkowski,et al.  Intermodal attention affects the processing of the temporal alignment of audiovisual stimuli , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  P. Jaśkowski,et al.  Simple Reaction Time and Perception of Temporal Order: Dissociations and Hypotheses , 1996, Perceptual and motor skills.

[45]  M. Kurosu,et al.  Determinants of the apparent usability [user interfaces] , 1995, 1995 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Intelligent Systems for the 21st Century.

[46]  Virpi Roto,et al.  User experience evaluation: do you know which method to use? , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[47]  Colline Poirier,et al.  Auditory motion perception activates visual motion areas in early blind subjects , 2006, NeuroImage.

[48]  J. Rauschecker,et al.  A Positron Emission Tomographic Study of Auditory Localization in the Congenitally Blind , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  David Chek Ling Ngo,et al.  Another look at a model for evaluating interface aesthetics , 2001 .

[50]  J. Lewald,et al.  Cross-modal perceptual integration of spatially and temporally disparate auditory and visual stimuli. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[51]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Specifying user knowledge for the design of interactive systems , 1996, Softw. Eng. J..

[52]  Sebastiano Pizzutilo,et al.  Modeling the user knowledge by belief networks , 2005, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[53]  Morten Winther,et al.  Emissions of NO x , particle mass and particle numbers from aircraft main engines, APU's and handling equipment at Copenhagen Airport , 2015 .

[54]  Jens Lehmann,et al.  LinkedGeoData: A core for a web of spatial open data , 2012, Semantic Web.

[55]  Andrew D. Miller,et al.  Give and take: a study of consumer photo-sharing culture and practice , 2007, CHI.

[56]  Virpi Roto,et al.  Towards Practical User Experience Evaluation Methods , 2008 .