Comparative analysis of FimB and FimE recombinase activity.

FimB and FimE are site-specific recombinases, part of the lambda integrase family, and invert a 314 bp DNA switch that controls the expression of type 1 fimbriae in Escherichia coli. FimB and FimE differ in their activity towards the fim switch, with FimB catalysing inversion in both directions in comparison to the higher-frequency but unidirectional on-to-off recombination catalysed by FimE. Previous work has demonstrated that FimB, but not FimE, recombination is completely inhibited in vitro and in vivo by a regulator, PapB, expressed from a distinct fimbrial locus. The aim of this work was to investigate differences between FimB and FimE activity by exploiting the differential inhibition demonstrated by PapB. The research focused on genetic changes to the fim switch that alter recombinase binding and its structural context. FimB and FimE still recombined a switch in which the majority of fimS DNA was replaced with a larger region of non-fim DNA. This demonstrated a minimal requirement for FimB and FimE recombination of the Fim binding sites and associated inverted repeats. With the original leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) and integration host factor (IHF)-dependent structure removed, PapB was now able to inhibit both recombinases. The relative affinities of FimB and FimE were determined for the four 'half sites'. This analysis, along with the effect of extensive swaps and duplications of the half sites on recombination frequency, demonstrated that FimB recruitment and therefore subsequent activity was dependent on a single half site and its context, whereas FimE recombination was less stringent, being able to interact initially with two half sites with equally high affinity. While increasing FimB recombination frequencies failed to overcome PapB repression, mutations made in recombinase binding sites resulted in inhibition of FimE recombination by PapB. Overall, the data support a model in which the recombinases differ in loading order and co-operative interactions. PapB exploits this difference and FimE becomes susceptible when its normal loading is restricted or changed.

[1]  J. Gelles,et al.  Viewing single λ site‐specific recombination events from start to finish , 2006 .

[2]  C. Dorman,et al.  DNA Supercoiling and the Lrp Protein Determine the Directionality of fim Switch DNA Inversion in Escherichia coli K-12 , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[3]  U. Dobrindt,et al.  Demonstration of regulatory cross-talk between P fimbriae and type 1 fimbriae in uropathogenic Escherichia coli. , 2006, Microbiology.

[4]  C. Dorman,et al.  Characterization of the Detachable Rho-Dependent Transcription Terminator of the fimE Gene in Escherichia coli K-12 , 2005, Journal of bacteriology.

[5]  Phoebe A Rice,et al.  New insight into site-specific recombination from Flp recombinase-DNA structures. , 2003, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[6]  E. Stadtman,et al.  Free radical-mediated oxidation of free amino acids and amino acid residues in proteins , 2003, Amino Acids.

[7]  I. Blomfield,et al.  Orientational control of fimE expression in Escherichia coli , 2001, Molecular microbiology.

[8]  B. Uhlin,et al.  PapB paralogues and their effect on the phase variation of type 1 fimbriae in Escherichia coli , 2001, Molecular microbiology.

[9]  B. Uhlin,et al.  Regulatory cross‐talk between adhesin operons in Escherichia coli: inhibition of type 1 fimbriae expression by the PapB protein , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[10]  I. Blomfield,et al.  The molecular basis for the specificity of fimE in the phase variation of type 1 fimbriae of Escherichia coli K‐12 , 1999, Molecular microbiology.

[11]  B. Uhlin,et al.  Oligomeric interaction of the PapB transcriptional regulator with the upstream activating region of pili adhesin gene promoters in Escherichia coli , 1998, Molecular microbiology.

[12]  Y. Mizunoe,et al.  Renal scarring by mannose-sensitive adhesin of Escherichia coli type 1 pili. , 1998, Nephron.

[13]  I. Blomfield,et al.  Leucine alters the interaction of the leucine‐responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) with the fim switch to stimulate site‐specific recombination in Escherichia coli , 1998, Molecular microbiology.

[14]  D. Sherratt,et al.  Transposition and site-specific recombination: adapting DNA cut-and-paste mechanisms to a variety of genetic rearrangements. , 1997, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[15]  D. Sherratt,et al.  Topological Selectivity in Xer Site-Specific Recombination , 1997, Cell.

[16]  I. Blomfield,et al.  Integration host factor stimulates both FimB‐ and FimE‐mediated site‐specific DNA inversion that controls phase variation of type 1 fimbriae expression in Escherichia coli , 1997, Molecular microbiology.

[17]  C. Svanborg,et al.  Type 1 fimbrial expression enhances Escherichia coli virulence for the urinary tract. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  C. Dorman,et al.  Multicopy fim B gene expression in Escherichia coli: binding to inverted repeats in vivo, effect on fimA gene transcription and DNA inversion , 1996, Molecular microbiology.

[19]  I. Blomfield,et al.  Interaction of FimB and FimE with the fim switch that controls the phase variation of type 1 fimbriae in Escherichia coli K‐12 , 1996, Molecular microbiology.

[20]  D. Belin,et al.  Tight regulation, modulation, and high-level expression by vectors containing the arabinose PBAD promoter , 1995, Journal of bacteriology.

[21]  C. Svanborg,et al.  Adhesins of Escherichia coli associated with extra-intestinal pathogenicity confer binding to colonic epithelial cells. , 1995, Microbial Pathogenesis.

[22]  D. Sherratt,et al.  Site-specific recombination and circular chromosome segregation. , 1995, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[23]  I. Blomfield,et al.  The leucine-responsive regulatory protein binds to the fim switch to control phase variation of type 1 fimbrial expression in Escherichia coli K-12 , 1994, Journal of bacteriology.

[24]  D. Sherratt,et al.  Two related recombinases are required for site-specific recombination at dif and cer in E. coli K12 , 1993, Cell.

[25]  I. Blomfield,et al.  Environmental regulation of the fim switch controlling type 1 fimbrial phase variation in Escherichia coli K-12: effects of temperature and media , 1993, Journal of bacteriology.

[26]  M. S. McClain,et al.  Lrp stimulates phase variation of type 1 fimbriation in Escherichia coli K-12 , 1993, Journal of bacteriology.

[27]  S. Kim,et al.  Lambda Int protein bridges between higher order complexes at two distant chromosomal loci attL and attR. , 1992, Science.

[28]  M. S. McClain,et al.  Type 1 fimbriation and fimE mutants of Escherichia coli K-12 , 1991, Journal of bacteriology.

[29]  M. S. McClain,et al.  Roles of fimB and fimE in site-specific DNA inversion associated with phase variation of type 1 fimbriae in Escherichia coli , 1991, Journal of bacteriology.

[30]  A. D. Dal Nogare,et al.  Characteristics of aerobic gram-negative bacteria colonizing critically ill patients. , 1991, The American review of respiratory disease.

[31]  M. S. McClain,et al.  Type 1 fimbriae mutants of Escherichia coli K12: characterization of recognized afimbriate strains and construction of new fim deletion mutants , 1991, Molecular microbiology.

[32]  I. Blomfield,et al.  Allelic exchange in Escherichia coli using the Bacillus subtilis sacB gene and a temperature‐sensitive pSC101 replicon , 1991, Molecular microbiology.

[33]  K. Krogfelt,et al.  Direct evidence that the FimH protein is the mannose-specific adhesin of Escherichia coli type 1 fimbriae , 1990, Infection and immunity.

[34]  B. Uhlin,et al.  Autoregulation and multiple DNA interactions by a transcriptional regulatory protein in E. coli pili biogenesis. , 1989, The EMBO journal.

[35]  L. Blyn,et al.  Phase‐variation of pyelonephritis‐associated pili in Escherichia coli: evidence for transcriptional regulation. , 1989, The EMBO journal.

[36]  R. E. Rose,et al.  The nucleotide sequence of pACYC184 , 1988, Nucleic Acids Res..

[37]  D. Friedman,et al.  Integration host factor is required for the DNA inversion that controls phase variation in Escherichia coli. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  A. Schaeffer,et al.  Relationship of type 1 pilus expression in Escherichia coli to ascending urinary tract infections in mice , 1987, Infection and immunity.

[39]  P. Klemm,et al.  Two regulatory fim genes, fimB and fimE, control the phase variation of type 1 fimbriae in Escherichia coli. , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[40]  P. Sadowski.  Site-specific recombinases: changing partners and doing the twist , 1986, Journal of bacteriology.

[41]  J. Abraham,et al.  An invertible element of DNA controls phase variation of type 1 fimbriae of Escherichia coli. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  D. Goldmann,et al.  The role of pili and capsule in the pathogenesis of neonatal infection with Escherichia coli K1. , 1983, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[43]  Y. Abe,et al.  Role of type 1 fimbriae in the pathogenesis of ascending urinary tract infection induced by escherichia coli in mice , 1983, Infection and immunity.

[44]  F. Neidhardt,et al.  Culture Medium for Enterobacteria , 1974, Journal of bacteriology.

[45]  H. Bergmans,et al.  The fim genes responsible for synthesis of type 1 fimbriae in Escherichia coli, cloning and genetic organization , 2004, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[46]  F. Studier,et al.  Use of T7 RNA polymerase to direct expression of cloned genes. , 1990, Methods in enzymology.

[47]  C. Yanisch-Perron,et al.  Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. , 1985, Gene.