Agriculture has seen many revolutions, whether the domestication of animals and plants a few thousand years ago, the systematic use of crop rotations and other improvements in farming practice a few hundred years ago, or the “green revolution” with systematic breeding and the widespread use of man-made fertilizers and pesticides a few decades ago. We suggest that agriculture is undergoing a fourth revolution triggered by the exponentially increasing use of information and communication technology (ICT) in agriculture.
New technologies, such as unmanned aerial vehicles with powerful, lightweight cameras, allow for improved farm management advice. Image courtesy of Shutterstock/Kleir.
Autonomous, robotic vehicles have been developed for farming purposes, such as mechanical weeding, application of fertilizer, or harvesting of fruits. The development of unmanned aerial vehicles with autonomous flight control (1), together with the development of lightweight and powerful hyperspectral snapshot cameras that can be used to calculate biomass development and fertilization status of crops (2, 3), opens the field for sophisticated farm management advice. Moreover, decision-tree models are available now that allow farmers to differentiate between plant diseases based on optical information (4). Virtual fence technologies (5) allow cattle herd management based on remote-sensing signals and sensors or actuators attached to the livestock.
Taken together, these technical improvements constitute a technical revolution that will generate disruptive changes in agricultural practices. This trend holds for farming not only in developed countries but also in developing countries, where deployments in ICT (e.g., use of mobile phones, access to the Internet) are being adopted at a rapid pace and could become the game-changers in the future (e.g., in the form of seasonal drought forecasts, climate-smart agriculture).
Such profound changes in practice come not only with opportunities but also big challenges. It is crucial to point them out at an early stage of this …
[↵][1]1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: achim.walter{at}usys.ethz.ch.
[1]: #xref-corresp-1-1
[1]
Corinne Iozzio.
Who's Responsible When a Car Controls the Wheel?
,
2016,
Scientific American.
[2]
L. Prokopy,et al.
Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States: a meta-analysis of the adoption literature.
,
2012,
Journal of environmental management.
[3]
Robert J. Wood,et al.
Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones
,
2015,
Nature.
[4]
Fei Li,et al.
Reflectance estimation of canopy nitrogen content in winter wheat using optimised hyperspectral spectral indices and partial least squares regression
,
2014
.
[5]
Cor Verdouw,et al.
Information and Communication Technology as a Driver for Change in Agri-food Chains
,
2013
.
[6]
R. DeFries,et al.
Metrics for land-scarce agriculture
,
2015,
Science.
[7]
Juliane Bendig,et al.
Low-weight and UAV-based Hyperspectral Full-frame Cameras for Monitoring Crops: Spectral Comparison with Portable Spectroradiometer Measurements
,
2015
.
[8]
R. Finger,et al.
Can Gridded Precipitation Data and Phenological Observations Reduce Basis Risk of Weather Index-based Insurance?
,
2016
.
[9]
T. Kutter,et al.
The role of communication and co-operation in the adoption of precision farming
,
2011,
Precision Agriculture.
[10]
Jeffrey D. Sachs,et al.
The Age of Sustainable Development
,
2015
.
[11]
Christian Bauckhage,et al.
Plant Phenotyping using Probabilistic Topic Models: Uncovering the Hyperspectral Language of Plants
,
2016,
Scientific Reports.
[12]
Christina Umstatter,et al.
Review: The evolution of virtual fences: A review
,
2011
.
[13]
Pete Smith,et al.
Importance of methane and nitrous oxide for Europe's terrestrial greenhouse-gas balance
,
2009
.
[14]
S. Polasky,et al.
Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices
,
2002,
Nature.