Purpose
This paper interrogates the relationships between tacit knowledge (of professionals) and performance measurement regimes (of post-modern organizations). Drawing on Polanyi’s (1958, 1968) ideas about tacit knowledge and Lyotard’s (1984) theory of performativity with regard to criteria such as profit-performance the applicability and relevance of tacit, working knowledge in the internet age is assessed. The paper examines: the effects of context on knowledge management (KM); tacit knowledge and performativity around the production, validation and assessment of knowledge within organizations; KM and the mercantilization of knowledge and critical questions as to how performativity impacts tacit knowledge and KM in the digital era.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper deconstructs popular and fashionable narratives around tacit knowledge and KM to critically appraise approaches to knowledge construction and transfer in contemporary and commercial contexts. The study draws on various specific critical incidents in commercial practice to assess where (and why) things went wrong with KM practices in the aftermath of the global financial crisis and in more recent attempts at large scale corporate fraud.
Findings
KM should not trade exclusively in instrumentalized, performative knowledge. Tacit knowledge involves a sense of what is going on and this is not easily measured or codified. Experiential understanding of what is required when engaging with clients, colleagues, senior partners, other businesses (and cultures) and the political contexts in which employees work is central to tacit knowledge. So too are performance measures and reward systems and herein lies the “uneasy dynamic”. The nature of any transfer of tacit knowledge is problematic, but such employee know-how remains critical to organizational performance and validating the use-value of knowledge for the purposes of KM.
Originality/value
Researchers have used the theories of Polanyi and Lyotard, but rarely combined them to investigate KM practices critically in post-modern organizations. By using the two theories, this paper critically examines the contemporary construction of tacit knowledge from perspectives that include the different discourses and localized practices through which it is produced and consumed.
[1]
R. Sawyer,et al.
Reflections on the Learning Sciences
,
2016
.
[2]
G. A. Straka,et al.
Informal learning: genealogy, concepts, antagonisms and questions
,
2005
.
[3]
Laurent Taskin,et al.
Knowledge Management Through the Development of Knowledge Repositories: Towards Work Degradation
,
2015
.
[4]
J. Spender.
Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management: Whence and Whither?
,
2008
.
[5]
J. Habermas.
Theory of Communicative Action
,
1981
.
[6]
B. Massumi,et al.
The postmodern condition : a report on knowledge
,
1979
.
[7]
Yvon Pesqueux.
Viewpoint: Questions on the theme of “global responsibility”
,
2003
.
[8]
P. Mason.
Meltdown: The End of the Age of Greed
,
2011
.
[9]
M. Polanyi.
Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension
,
1997
.
[10]
Paul Muolo,et al.
Chain of Blame: How Wall Street Caused the Mortgage and Credit Crisis
,
2008
.
[11]
M. Lounsbury.
Institutional Rationality and Practice Variation: New Directions in the Institutional Analysis of Practice
,
2007
.
[12]
James R. Barth,et al.
The Rise and Fall of the U.S. Mortgage and Credit Markets: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Market Meltdown
,
2009
.
[13]
Barry Ritholtz,et al.
Bailout Nation: How Greed and Easy Money Corrupted Wall Street and Shook the World Economy
,
2009
.
[14]
S. Clegg,et al.
Conceptualizing historical organization studies
,
2016
.
[15]
Andrew Chan,et al.
Organisational knowledge and the effects of 'billable' hours
,
2006
.
[16]
M. Foucault.
Archaeology Of Knowledge
,
2017
.
[17]
J. Garrick.
Informal Learning in the Workplace: Unmasking Human Resource Development
,
1998
.
[18]
Klaus North,et al.
Effective knowledge work : answers to the management challenges of the 21st century
,
2011
.
[19]
R. Grigg.
Lacan, language, and philosophy
,
2008
.
[20]
Timothy S. Clark,et al.
Between Innovation and Legitimation— Boundaries and Knowledge Flow in Management Consultancy
,
2009
.