Quantitative Concession Behavior Analysis and Prediction for Decision Support in Electronic Negotiations

Quantitative analysis of negotiation concession behavior is performed based on empirical data with the purpose of providing simple and intuitive decision support in electronic negotiations. Previous work on non-linear concave preferences and subsequent concession crossover provides a theoretical basis for the model. The authors propose a model which quantifies the remaining concession potential for each issue and a generalization of the model which permits the memory/decay of past concessions. These models permit the analysis of negotiators' concession behavior. Using the proposed models, it was possible to quantitatively determine that negotiators in the authors' negotiation case exhibit concession crossover issues and thus have a tendency to give concessions on issues with the most remaining concession potential. This finding provides empirical evidence of concession crossover in actual concessions and the corresponding model permits the design of a simple and intuitive prediction methodology, which could be used in real world negotiations by decision support systems or automated negotiation agents.

[1]  Katia P. Sycara,et al.  Bayesian learning in negotiation , 1998, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[2]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Agents that buy and sell , 1999, CACM.

[3]  Rudolf Vetschera,et al.  Preference structures and negotiator behavior in electronic negotiations , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[4]  Sandip Sen,et al.  Modeling opponent decision in repeated one-shot negotiations , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[5]  Asaf Frieder,et al.  Value Model Agent: A Novel Preference Profiler for Negotiation with Agents , 2013, Complex Automated Negotiations.

[6]  Jose M. Such,et al.  Strategies for avoiding preference profiling in agent-based e-commerce environments , 2013, Applied Intelligence.

[7]  Arie Segev,et al.  Automated Negotiations: A Survey of the State of the Art , 1997, Wirtschaftsinf..

[8]  Ryszard Kowalczyk,et al.  Adaptive Negotiation with On-Line Prediction of Opponent Behaviour in Agent-Based Negotiations , 2006, 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology.

[9]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  User Assessment of Internet-Based Negotiation Support Systems: An Exploratory Study , 2006, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[10]  Rudolf Vetschera Preference Structures of Negotiators and Negotiation Outcomes , 2006 .

[11]  Gregory Kersten,et al.  Experimental Assessment of Agent-Supported Electronic Negotiations , 2013, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  R. Vetschera,et al.  A Classification of Bargaining Steps and their Impact on Negotiation Outcomes , 2008 .

[13]  Rudolf Vetschera,et al.  Inconsistent Behaviour in Electronic Negotiations - An Exploratory Analysis , 2006, Electron. Mark..

[14]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  IAMhaggler2011: A Gaussian Process Regression Based Negotiation Agent , 2013, Complex Automated Negotiations.

[15]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  Agent-supported negotiations in the e-marketplace , 2005, Int. J. Electron. Bus..

[16]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Learning on opponent's preferences to make effective multi-issue negotiation trade-offs , 2004, ICEC '04.

[17]  Vicent J. Botti,et al.  Evolutionary-aided negotiation model for bilateral bargaining in Ambient Intelligence domains with complex utility functions , 2013, Inf. Sci..

[18]  N. R. Jennings,et al.  To appear in: Int Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation GDN2000 Keynote Paper Automated Negotiation: Prospects, Methods and Challenges , 2022 .

[19]  Stathes Hadjiefthymiades,et al.  On the use of particle swarm optimization and Kernel density estimator in concurrent negotiations , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[20]  T. N. Wong,et al.  A hybrid multi-agent negotiation protocol supporting agent mobility in virtual enterprises , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[21]  Neale,et al.  Non-linear Preference Functions and Negotiated Outcomes. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[22]  Michael Gendron,et al.  Best Practices for Culturally Sensitive Data Visualizations , 2016, Int. J. Bus. Intell. Res..

[23]  Chongming Hou Predicting agents tactics in automated negotiation , 2004 .

[24]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  A Software Framework for Automated Negotiation , 2004, SELMAS.

[25]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  Pairwise issue modeling for negotiation counteroffer prediction using neural networks , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[26]  Julita Vassileva,et al.  Bilateral Negotiation with Incomplete and Uncertain Information: A Decision-Theoretic Approach Using a Model of the Opponent , 2000, CIA.

[27]  G. Kersten Analysis e-Democracy and Participatory Decision Processes : Lessons from e-Negotiation Experiments , 2003 .

[28]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  Predicting opponent's moves in electronic negotiations using neural networks , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[29]  Gregory B. Northcraft,et al.  Negotiating with Nonlinear Subjective Utilities: Why Some Concessions Are More Equal Than Others , 1995 .

[30]  Roberto García,et al.  Using the Rhizomer Platform for Semantic Decision Support Systems Development , 2010, Int. J. Decis. Support Syst. Technol..

[31]  Wei-Po Lee,et al.  Towards agent-based decision making in the electronic marketplace: interactive recommendation and automated negotiation , 2004, Expert Syst. Appl..

[32]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Using Gaussian Processes to Optimise Concession in Complex Negotiations against Unknown Opponents , 2011, IJCAI.

[33]  Pao-Long Chang,et al.  Evaluations of Tactics for Automated Negotiations , 2008 .

[34]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  WWW-based negotiation support: design, implementation, and use , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..

[35]  Jiming Liu,et al.  A genetic agent-based negotiation system , 2001, Comput. Networks.

[36]  Tawfik Jelassi,et al.  Negotiation support systems: an overview of design issues and existing software , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[37]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  e-Negotiation Systems and Software Agents: Methods, Models, and Applications , 2006 .

[38]  Jeonghwan Gwak,et al.  Novel dynamic diversity controlling EAs for coevolving optimal negotiation strategies , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[39]  Gonzalo Pajares,et al.  Multi-UAV target search using decentralized gradient-based negotiation with expected observation , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[40]  David C. Yen,et al.  A secure reverse Vickrey auction scheme with bid privacy , 2006, Inf. Sci..

[41]  Ivan Bruha Decision Making by a Multiple-Rule Classifier: The Role of Rule Qualities , 2008 .

[42]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents , 1998, Robotics Auton. Syst..