Estimation of Variance Components with Large-Scale Dominance Models

The cost of computations for dominance models using the algorithm of Hoeschele and VanRaden (8) can be substantially decreased. The number of equations can be reduced by applying the recurrence equation to a limited number of ancestors. Computing disk space and central processing unit time can be lowered when the mixed model equations are solved by iteration on the data using the method of modified second-order Jacobi. Estimation of the dominance variance for very large animal models is feasible with method R. Tests involved up to 3 million first lactation records for stature of Holsteins. The model included effects of management, regression on inbreeding percentage, age, animal additive, and dominance. Estimates of the dominance variance ranged from 2.9 to 13.5% of the phenotypic variance for a data file with 0.40 million animals and 7.5 to 8% for a data file with 3.3 million animals. Genetic evaluations with dominance effect in the model required less than twice the memory and central processing unit time of evaluations with the additive model. Computations with dominance models are now feasible for large data files.

[1]  Daniel Gianola,et al.  Indirect Solution of Mixed Model Equations , 1987 .

[2]  C. Kelley Iterative Methods for Linear and Nonlinear Equations , 1987 .

[3]  Louis A. Hageman,et al.  Iterative Solution of Large Linear Systems. , 1971 .

[4]  C. Cockerham,et al.  An Extension of the Concept of Partitioning Hereditary Variance for Analysis of Covariances among Relatives When Epistasis Is Present. , 1954, Genetics.

[5]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Use of reproductive technology to estimate variances and predict effects of gene interactions. , 1992, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  M. Bulmer The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics , 1981 .

[7]  W. Beyer CRC Handbook of Mathematical Sciences , 1978 .

[8]  P M VanRaden,et al.  Rapid inversion of dominance relationship matrices for noninbred populations by including sire by dam subclass effects. , 1991, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  K. Scheller,et al.  Color coordinates for assessment of dietary vitamin E effects on beef color stability. , 1996, Journal of animal science.

[10]  C. R. Henderson Prediction of Merits of Potential Matings from Sire-Maternal Grandsire Models with Nonadditive Genetic Effects , 1989 .

[11]  Studies on Estimation of Genetic Variances Under Nonadditive Gene Action , 1988 .

[12]  L. García-Cortés,et al.  On a multivariate implementation of the Gibbs sampler , 1996, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[13]  D. Gianola,et al.  Marginal inferences about variance components in a mixed linear model using Gibbs sampling , 1993, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[14]  Additive and nonadditive genetic variance for production traits in Canadian Holsteins. , 1990 .

[15]  L. D. Van Vleck,et al.  Estimation of non-additive genetic variances in three synthetic lines of beef cattle using an animal model. , 1995, Journal of animal science.

[16]  E. B. Burnside,et al.  Additive and dominance genetic variation for dairy production traits under an animal model , 1991 .

[17]  L. R. Schaeffer,et al.  Computing Strategies for Solving Mixed Model Equations , 1986 .

[18]  D. Gianola,et al.  Extrapolation and Convergence Criteria with Jacobi and Gauss-Seidel Iteration in Animal Models , 1987 .

[19]  Additive and Nonadditive Genetic Variation for Conformation Traits in Canadian Holsteins , 1990 .

[20]  R M Bourdon,et al.  Method R variance components procedure: application on the simple breeding value model. , 1994, Journal of animal science.