Toward a unified theory of spatiotemporal processing in the retina

Why do stabilized images fade? How can X cells in the retina respond linearly to a broad range of spatiotemporal stimulation functions in spite of possible nonlinear preprocessing? Why have models of spatial vision that utilize static images and assume linearity of preprocessing led to reasonable results in spite of the two questions above? This chapter introduces the push-pull shunting network, a model of spatiotemporal visual processing that resolves these and other controversial findings. Development of the model is based on an analysis of the spatial and temporal response characteristics of networks of neurons that obey membrane equations. The resulting architecture is structurally similar to the mammalian retina, requiring a mechanism for temporal adaptation analogous to photoreceptors, followed by cells of opposite polarity analogous to on and off bipolar cells, and finally a layer of ganglion cells that summate bipolar cell inputs. The model predicts that X and Y cells consist of the same neural mechanism acting in different parametric regimes. In agreement with morphological and physiological data, analyses and numerical simulations show that an increase in receptive field center size changes the model’s response from X-like to Y-like. This functional duality results from mathematical properties of the push-pull shunting network, which can selectively enhance sustained or transient response components on the basis of RF morphology. The model also explains how it is possible for X cells to respond linearly to a broad range of spatial and temporal modulation functions in spite of arbitrary nonlinear preprocessing. Finally, in general agreement with biological data, the model predicts that stationary images lead to loss of instantaneous contrast at equilibrium, i.e., that stabilized images fade, as an unavoidable side effect of photoreceptor adaptation.

[1]  A. Hodgkin The conduction of the nervous impulse , 1964 .

[2]  S. Grossberg Contour Enhancement , Short Term Memory , and Constancies in Reverberating Neural Networks , 1973 .

[3]  P. Sterling,et al.  Microcircuitry of beta ganglion cells in cat retina , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  P. H. Schiller Central connections of the retinal ON and OFF pathways , 1982, Nature.

[5]  M. Slaughter,et al.  2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid: a new pharmacological tool for retina research. , 1981, Science.

[6]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Some physiological and biochemical consequences of psychological postulates. , 1968, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  T. Lamb,et al.  Cyclic GMP and calcium: The internal messengers of excitation and adaptation in vertebrate photoreceptors , 1990, Vision Research.

[8]  M M Sondhi,et al.  Model for visual luminance discrimination and flicker detection. , 1968, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[9]  J. Dowling,et al.  Organization of the retina of the mudpuppy, Necturus maculosus. II. Intracellular recording. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  G. Sperling Model of visual adaptation and contrast detection , 1970 .

[11]  S. Grossberg The quantized geometry of visual space: The coherent computation of depth, form, and lightness , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[12]  R. W. Rodieck Quantitative analysis of cat retinal ganglion cell response to visual stimuli. , 1965, Vision research.

[13]  S. W. Kuffler Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina. , 1953, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  B. Boycott,et al.  The morphological types of ganglion cells of the domestic cat's retina , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  H. Saito,et al.  Morphology of physiologically identified X‐, Y‐, and W‐type retinal ganglion cells of the cat , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  F. Werblin Adaptation in a vertebrate retina: intracellular recording in Necturus. , 1971, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  G. G. Furman,et al.  Comparison of models for subtractive and shunting lateral-inhibition in receptor-neuron fields , 1965, Kybernetik.

[18]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  Nonlinear neural networks: Principles, mechanisms, and architectures , 1988, Neural Networks.

[19]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  S. Gagné,et al.  Neural models for sustained and ON-OFF units of insect lamina , 1990, Biological Cybernetics.

[21]  Michael J. Korenberg,et al.  Identification of Intensive Nonlinearities in Cascade Models of Visual Cortex and its Relation to Cell Classification , 1989 .

[22]  S. Grossberg Intracellular mechanisms of adaptation and self-regulation in self-organizing networks: the role of chemical transducers. , 1980, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[23]  Paolo Gaudiano,et al.  A Unified Neural Network Model of Spatio-Temporal Processing in X and Y Retinal Ganglion Cells. I: Analytical Results , 1992 .

[24]  Y. Fukuda,et al.  Morphological correlates of physiologically identified Y-, X-, and W-cells in cat retina. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  S. Grossberg Neural pattern discrimination. , 1970, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of planned arm movements: emergent invariants and speed-accuracy properties during trajectory formation. , 1988, Psychological review.

[27]  Paolo Gaudiano Neural network models for spatio-temporal visual processing and adaptive sensory-motor control , 1991 .

[28]  F. Werblin Synaptic connections, receptive fields, and patterns of activity in the tiger salamander retina. A simulation of patterns of activity formed at each cellular level from photoreceptors to ganglion cells [the Friendenwald lecture]. , 1991, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[29]  R. W. DITCHBURN,et al.  Vision with a Stabilized Retinal Image , 1952, Nature.

[30]  R. Shapley,et al.  Quantitative analysis of retinal ganglion cell classifications. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  Paolo Gaudiano,et al.  A unified neural network model of spatiotemporal processing in X and Y retinal ganglion cells , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[32]  P Sterling,et al.  The ON-alpha ganglion cell of the cat retina and its presynaptic cell types , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[33]  R. Shapley,et al.  Linear and nonlinear spatial subunits in Y cat retinal ganglion cells. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[34]  W. Levick,et al.  Brisk and sluggish concentrically organized ganglion cells in the cat's retina , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[35]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  ADAPTATION AND TRANSMITTER GATING IN VERTEBRATE PHOTORECEPTORS , 1987 .

[36]  H. Barlow Summation and inhibition in the frog's retina , 1953, The Journal of physiology.

[37]  Helga Kolb,et al.  Amacrine cells, bipolar cells and ganglion cells of the cat retina: A Golgi study , 1981, Vision Research.