Using Electronic Procurement to Facilitate Supply Chain Integration: An Exploratory Study of US-based Firms

With ever‐increasing competitive pressures, growing numbers of firms use electronic procurement (e‐procurement) in an attempt to reduce costs and increase profitability. Academicians and practitioners alike agree that one of the most important benefits of e‐procurement is its ability to facilitate integration within the firm and across the supply chain. However, there is much to be discovered about the prevalence of actual implementation of e‐procurement. The purpose of this study is to empirically examine the extent to which firms operating in diverse industries use nine different e‐procurement tools that differ in their ability to facilitate supply chain integration. The survey data were provided by a sample of 142 members of the Institute for Supply Management (ISM). Factor analysis revealed that the group of nine e‐procurement tools could be categorized into two types: basic, single‐process tools and integrative tools. A t‐test of the mean differences between each type of e‐procurement tool revealed that firms used basic, single‐process tools to a greater extent than they used integrative forms of e‐procurement. To further explore firms’ use of e‐procurement, we attempted to ascertain whether the industry in which a firm operates impacts use. Logistic regression revealed that firm sector has an effect on the use of integrative eprocurement tools, with firms operating in the petroleum and the transportation equipment sectors being less likely to use them than their manufacturing counterparts. These findings are important, as previous research indicates that effective supply chain integration is associated with improvements in production planning, inventory management, distribution, and overall supply chain performance.

[1]  S. Purchase,et al.  Factors influencing E- procurement usage , 2006 .

[2]  E. Santarelli Finance and Technological Change: Theory and Evidence , 1995 .

[3]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  A First Course in Factor Analysis 2nd Ed , 1973 .

[4]  J. Neter,et al.  Applied Linear Regression Models , 1983 .

[5]  L. D. Boer,et al.  A conceptual model for assessing the impact of electronic procurement , 2002 .

[6]  Gianluca Spina,et al.  Reconsidering e‐business strategy and the impact on supply chains , 2005 .

[7]  H. Wannenwetsch,et al.  E-Supply-Chain-Management , 2002 .

[8]  Gayathri Govuindasamy Issues In Supply Chain Management For DHL Exel , 2009 .

[9]  Chee-Sing Yap,et al.  Distinguishing characteristics of organizations using computers , 1990, Inf. Manag..

[10]  Antonio Davila,et al.  Research Paper Series Graduate School of Business Stanford University Moving Procurement Systems to the Internet: the Adoption and Use of E-procurement Technology Models , 2022 .

[11]  C. Wisner A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODEL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES AND FIRM PERFORMANCE , 2003 .

[12]  A. Satir,et al.  Strategic Sourcing: A Framework and a Case Study , 2000 .

[13]  G. Ragatz,et al.  An Examination of Collaborative Planning Effectiveness and Supply Chain Performance , 2005 .

[14]  Richard J. Palmer,et al.  Moving Procurement Systems to the Internet , 2003 .

[15]  D. Kehoe,et al.  New paradigms in planning and control across manufacturing supply chains ‐ The utilisation of Internet technologies , 2001 .

[16]  T. M. Rajkumar,et al.  E-Procurement: Business and Technical Issues , 2001, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[17]  Robert E. Spekman,et al.  An empirical investigation into supply chain management: a perspective on partnerships , 1998 .

[18]  Damodar Gujarati,et al.  Student solutions manual for use with basic econometrics , 2003 .

[19]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[20]  Phillip L. Carter,et al.  The future of purchasing and supply: A ten-year forecast1 , 2000 .

[21]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Strategic Supplier Segmentation: The Next “Best Practice” in Supply Chain Management , 1998 .

[22]  M. Porter Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[23]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1983 .

[24]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Research Report: Empirical Test of an EDI Adoption Model , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  M. Frohlich,et al.  Demand chain management in manufacturing and services: web-based integration, drivers and performance , 2002 .

[26]  Marianna Sigala,et al.  E-volution of a supply chain: cases and best practices , 2004, Internet Res..

[27]  P. W. Stonebraker,et al.  Supply chain integration: exploring product and environmental contingencies , 2006 .

[28]  Daniel C. Bello,et al.  Adoption of electronic commerce tools in business procurement: Enhanced buying center structure and processes , 2002 .

[29]  G. Premkumar,et al.  Adoption of new information technologies in rural small businesses , 1999 .

[30]  Larry C. Giunipero,et al.  e-Purchasing Plus: Changing the Way Corporations Buy , 2000 .

[31]  Hokey Min,et al.  E-purchasing: profiles of adopters and nonadopters , 2003 .

[32]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  Effect of supply chain integration on the relationship between diversification and performance: evidence from Japanese and Korean firms , 2002 .

[33]  Blanca Hernández Ortega,et al.  Analysis of the moderating effect of industry on online behaviour , 2006, Online Inf. Rev..

[34]  T. Corsi,et al.  Adopting new technologies for supply chain management , 2003 .

[35]  Luvai Motiwalla,et al.  An intra- and inter-industry analysis of e-business effectiveness , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[36]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  A first course in factor analysis , 1973 .

[37]  John Gattorna,et al.  Strategic supply chain alignment : best practice in supply chain management , 1998 .

[38]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  Evaluating the integration of supply chain information systems: A case study , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[39]  William Foster,et al.  B2B e-commerce adoption decisions in Taiwan: the interaction of organizational, industrial, governmental and cultural factors , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[40]  Jakob B. Madsen Book review: Basic Econometrics, Damodar N. Gujarati, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995 , 1998 .

[41]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[42]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[43]  Ram Narasimhan,et al.  Is Purchasing Really Strategic , 1996 .

[44]  R. Cagliano,et al.  E‐business strategy , 2003 .

[45]  Efraim Turban,et al.  Electronic Commerce 2002: A Managerial Perspective , 2002 .

[46]  G. Frankwick,et al.  A Contingency Perspective of Communication, Conflict Resolution and Buyer Search Effort in Buyer‐Supplier Relationships , 2004 .

[47]  M. Cooper,et al.  Supply Chain Postponement and Speculation Strategies: How to choose the right strategy , 1998 .

[48]  N. Sanders IT Alignment in Supply Chain Relationships: A Study of Supplier Benefits , 2005 .

[49]  Hokey Min,et al.  Developing the profiles of truck drivers for their successful recruitment and retention , 2003 .

[50]  Patricia J. Daugherty,et al.  PREDICTING EDI TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION IN LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT: THE INFLUENCE OF CONTEXT AND STRUCTURE , 1995 .

[51]  A. Adam Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[52]  R. MacAvoy,et al.  Frictionless Commerce? A Comparison of Internet and Conventional Retailers , 1999 .

[53]  Amy Z. Zeng,et al.  Achieving information integration in supply chain management through B2B e-hubs: concepts and analyses , 2003, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[54]  Vijay R. Kannan,et al.  Supply Chain Management: An Empirical Study of its Impact on Performance , 1999 .