How copying affects the amount, evenness and persistence of cultural knowledge: insights from the social learning strategies tournament

Darwinian processes should favour those individuals that deploy the most effective strategies for acquiring information about their environment. We organized a computer-based tournament to investigate which learning strategies would perform well in a changing environment. The most successful strategies relied almost exclusively on social learning (here, learning a behaviour performed by another individual) rather than asocial learning, even when environments were changing rapidly; moreover, successful strategies focused learning effort on periods of environmental change. Here, we use data from tournament simulations to examine how these strategies might affect cultural evolution, as reflected in the amount of culture (i.e. number of cultural traits) in the population, the distribution of cultural traits across individuals, and their persistence through time. We found that high levels of social learning are associated with a larger amount of more persistent knowledge, but a smaller amount of less persistent expressed behaviour, as well as more uneven distributions of behaviour, as individuals concentrated on exploiting a smaller subset of behaviour patterns. Increased rates of environmental change generated increases in the amount and evenness of behaviour. These observations suggest that copying confers on cultural populations an adaptive plasticity, allowing them to respond to changing environments rapidly by drawing on a wider knowledge base.

[1]  Luke Rendell,et al.  ROGERS’ PARADOX RECAST AND RESOLVED: POPULATION STRUCTURE AND THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIAL LEARNING STRATEGIES , 2010, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[2]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Exploring the costs and benefits of social information use: an appraisal of current experimental evidence , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Kevin N. Laland,et al.  Conformist learning in nine-spined sticklebacks' foraging decisions , 2010, Biology Letters.

[4]  P. Bateson Perspectives in Ethology: Volume 2 , 1976 .

[5]  K. Laland Social learning strategies , 2004, Learning & behavior.

[6]  Nicola S. Clayton,et al.  The Mentality of Crows: Convergent Evolution of Intelligence in Corvids and Apes , 2004, Science.

[7]  P. Richerson,et al.  • AN EVOLUTIONARY MODEL OF SOCIAL LEARNING: THE EFFECTS OF SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIATON , 2013 .

[8]  A. Whiten,et al.  How do apes ape? , 2004, Learning & behavior.

[9]  R. Boyd,et al.  The evolution of conformist transmission and the emergence of between-group differences. , 1998 .

[10]  Magnus Enquist,et al.  Social Learning : A Solution to Rogers ’ s Paradox of Nonadaptive Culture , 2007 .

[11]  K. Laland,et al.  Learning by proportional observation in a species of fish , 2010 .

[12]  T. Valone,et al.  Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[13]  B. Galef,et al.  Chapter 4 Strategies for Social Learning , 2009 .

[14]  S. Ghirlanda,et al.  Evolution of social learning does not explain the origin of human cumulative culture. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  Marcus W. Feldman,et al.  Gene-Culture Coevolutionary Theory: A Test Case , 1995, Current Anthropology.

[16]  Magnus Enquist,et al.  One cultural parent makes no culture , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[18]  Joseph Henrich,et al.  On the nature of cultural transmission networks: evidence from Fijian villages for adaptive learning biases , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  Alan R. Rogers,et al.  Does Biology Constrain Culture , 1988 .

[20]  B. Galef,et al.  Strategies for Social Learning: Testing Predictions from Formal Theory , 2009 .

[21]  C. List,et al.  Group decisions in humans and animals: a survey , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  S. Perry Social traditions and social learning in capuchin monkeys (Cebus) , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  H. Roche,et al.  Why Copy Others? Insights from the Social Learning Strategies Tournament , 2010 .

[24]  R. Axelrod More Effective Choice in the Prisoner's Dilemma , 1980 .

[25]  A. Whiten The scope of culture in chimpanzees, humans and ancestral apes , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  J. Faraway Extending the Linear Model with R: Generalized Linear, Mixed Effects and Nonparametric Regression Models , 2005 .

[27]  D. Sumpter The principles of collective animal behaviour , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  Judith M Burkart,et al.  Social learning and evolution: the cultural intelligence hypothesis , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  A consumer's guide to evenness indices , 1996 .

[30]  Luke J. Matthews,et al.  Social enhancement can create adaptive, arbitrary and maladaptive cultural traditions , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  Thomas E. Currie,et al.  Mode and tempo in the evolution of socio-political organization: reconciling ‘Darwinian’ and ‘Spencerian’ evolutionary approaches in anthropology , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  M. Feldman,et al.  Individual Versus Social Learning: Evolutionary Analysis in a Fluctuating Environment , 1996 .

[33]  J. Henrich,et al.  The evolution of cultural evolution , 2003 .

[34]  Luke J. Matthews,et al.  Can Traditions Emerge from the Interaction of Stimulus Enhancement and Reinforcement Learning? An Experimental Model. , 2010, American anthropologist.

[35]  Frank C Keil,et al.  The scope and limits of overimitation in the transmission of artefact culture , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  R. Punnett,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.

[37]  Magnus Enquist,et al.  CRITICAL POINTS IN CURRENT THEORY OF CONFORMIST SOCIAL LEARNING , 2007 .

[38]  Joe Yuichiro Wakano,et al.  Evolution of social learning: a mathematical analysis. , 2004, Theoretical population biology.

[39]  M. Feldman,et al.  Cultural transmission and evolution: a quantitative approach. , 1981, Monographs in population biology.

[40]  J. Bendor,et al.  Effective Choice in the Prisoner ' s Dilemma , 2007 .

[41]  K. Schlag Why Imitate, and If So, How?, : A Boundedly Rational Approach to Multi-armed Bandits , 1998 .

[42]  K. Schlag Why Imitate, and if so, How? Exploring a Model of Social Evolution , 2010 .

[43]  Simon J. Greenhill,et al.  Language evolution and human history: what a difference a date makes , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[44]  Elhanan Borenstein,et al.  EVOLUTION OF LEARNING IN FLUCTUATING ENVIRONMENTS: WHEN SELECTION FAVORS BOTH SOCIAL AND EXPLORATORY INDIVIDUAL LEARNING , 2008, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[45]  Roderich Groß,et al.  Simple learning rules to cope with changing environments , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[46]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Social Learning in Insects — From Miniature Brains to Consensus Building , 2007, Current Biology.

[47]  R. Boyd,et al.  On Modeling Cognition and Culture: Why cultural evolution does not require replication of representations , 2002 .