Improvement of spatial selectivity and decrease of mutual information of tri-polar concentric ring electrodes

Electroencephalography (EEG) signals are spatio-temporal in nature. EEG has very good temporal resolution but typically does not possess high spatial resolution. The surface Laplacian enhances the spatial resolution and selectivity of the surface electrical activity recording. Concentric ring electrodes have been shown to estimate the surface Laplacian directly with significantly better spatial resolution than conventional electrodes. For this report movement-related potentials (MRP) signals were analyzed. The signals were recorded using tri-polar ring electrodes in the original configuration as well as in bipolar and unipolar configurations achieved by excluding or shorting recording surfaces of the tri-polar version, respectively. The electrodes were placed in an array scheme of 35, encompassing the area between Fz-Cz-Pz-P3-T5-T3-F7-F3 centered on C3. Data were measured in five steps sequentially using only seven electrodes at a time, displaced after each step and aligned during evaluation later. Subjects were cued to press a micro-switch. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), spatial selectivity, and mutual information (MI) of the MRP signals recorded with the different electrode systems were compared. The MRP signals recorded with the tri-polar concentric ring electrode system have significantly higher SNR than from bipolar concentric ring electrode and conventional disc electrode emulations. The tri-polar electrodes have also shown significantly higher spatial selectivity as well as significantly less mutual information between locations than the other two electrode configurations tested. These characteristics should make tri-polar concentric electrodes beneficial for EEG applications.

[1]  M Hallett,et al.  Steady-state movement-related cortical potentials: a new approach to assessing cortical activity associated with fast repetitive finger movements. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  Bin He,et al.  High-resolution EEG: a new realistic geometry spline Laplacian estimation technique , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  Michael R. Neuman,et al.  The Undergraduate Biomedical Engineering Curriculum: Devices and Instruments , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Weizhong Dai,et al.  Tri-polar concentric ring electrode development for Laplacian electroencephalography , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  B. He,et al.  Brain electric source imaging: scalp Laplacian mapping and cortical imaging. , 1999, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[6]  A. Kraskov,et al.  Estimating mutual information. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  H. Flor,et al.  Steady-State Movement-Related Potentials Evoked by Fast Repetitive Movements , 2004, Brain Topography.

[8]  C. Disselhorst-Klug,et al.  Improvement of spatial resolution in surface-EMG: a theoretical and experimental comparison of different spatial filters , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  W. Besio,et al.  Development of a Tri-polar Concentric Ring Electrode for Acquiring Accurate Laplacian Body Surface Potentials , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Tian Lan,et al.  Salient EEG Channel Selection in Brain Computer Interfaces by Mutual Information Maximization , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[11]  Dario Farina,et al.  Concentric-ring electrode systems for noninvasive detection of single motor unit activity , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.