A conceptual framework for the business model of smart grids

In spite of the strong believes, the progress and maturity in the deployment of smart grids is very slow. The main reasons behind the slow pace are not due to the technical aspects but, perhaps, as a result of an inappropriate business model, not adequately centered to the customers. Nature, with ability to survive and resist, is a splendid example of competitive life. Mathematical models show that natural complex systems are the replication of simple structures. Exploring this approach, smart grids can be seen as an aggregation of mini and micro grids, with the smart user as fundamental stone. The technical aggregation can be paired with a new business model, based on correspondent enterprises, devoted to operation and maintenance. This framework can open new opportunities, favoring innovations, increasing resilience, pushing toward more responsible energy usage behavior while giving tangible economic and social benefits to the customers.

[1]  J. Schumpeter.  The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle , 1934 .

[2]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[3]  John L. Enos,et al.  Technical Progress and Profits: Process Improvements in Petroleum Refining , 1962 .

[4]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[5]  Sharon L. Milgram,et al.  The Small World Problem , 1967 .

[6]  David Eppstein,et al.  Category-based routing in social networks: Membership dimension and the small-world phenomenon , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computational Aspects of Social Networks (CASoN).

[7]  Gianfranco Chicco,et al.  Future Business Model For Cellular Microgrids , 2014, BMSD 2014.

[8]  Sarah C. Darby,et al.  Smart metering: what potential for householder engagement? , 2010 .

[9]  Marco Aiello,et al.  The Power Grid as a Complex Network: a Survey , 2011, ArXiv.

[10]  R. Lucas.  On the Mechanics of Economic Development , 1988 .

[11]  S. Shane.  A General Theory of Entrepreneurship , 2003 .

[12]  C. Freeman.  Chemical Process Plant: Innovation and the World Market , 1968, National Institute Economic Review.

[13]  Arun K. Ramani,et al.  Protein interaction networks from yeast to human. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.

[14]  David Eppstein,et al.  Category-Based Routing in Social Networks: Membership Dimension and the Small-World Phenomenon (Full) , 2013, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[15]  B. Neenan,et al.  Societal Benefits of Smart Metering Investments , 2008 .

[16]  S. Shane.  A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-Opportunity Nexus , 2003 .

[17]  Glen L. Urban,et al.  Lead User Analyses for the Development of New Industrial Products , 1988 .

[18]  R. Solow.  TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE AGGREGATE PRODUCTION FUNCTION , 1957 .

[19]  P. Romer,et al.  Human Capital and Growth: Theory and Evidence , 1989 .

[20]  P. Romer.  Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  Hidefumi Sawai.  Structuring Hierarchical Multi-Star Small-World Networks for Real-World Applications , 2013, ICCS.

[22]  Huan Zhou,et al.  Vulnerability Assessment of Power Grid Based on Complex Network Theory , 2009, 2009 Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference.

[23]  E. Hippel,et al.  FROM EXPERIENCE: Developing New Product Concepts Via the Lead User Method: A Case Study in a “Low-Tech” Field , 1992 .