A fluorophore attached to nicotinic acetylcholine receptor βM2 detects productive binding of agonist to the αδ site

To study conformational transitions at the muscle nicotinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptor (nAChR), a rhodamine fluorophore was tethered to a Cys side chain introduced at the β19′ position in the M2 region of the nAChR expressed in Xenopus oocytes. This procedure led to only minor changes in receptor function. During agonist application, fluorescence increased by (ΔF/F) ≈10%, and the emission peak shifted to lower wavelengths, indicating a more hydrophobic environment for the fluorophore. The dose–response relations for ΔF agreed well with those for epibatidine-induced currents, but were shifted ≈100-fold to the left of those for ACh-induced currents. Because (i) epibatidine binds more tightly to the αγ-binding site than to the αδ site and (ii) ACh binds with reverse-site selectivity, these data suggest that ΔF monitors an event linked to binding specifically at the αδ-subunit interface. In experiments with flash-applied agonists, the earliest detectable ΔF occurs within milliseconds, i.e., during activation. At low [ACh] (≤ 10 μM), a phase of ΔF occurs with the same time constant as desensitization, presumably monitoring an increased population of agonist-bound receptors. However, recovery from ΔF is complete before the slowest phase of recovery from desensitization (time constant ≈250 s), showing that one or more desensitized states have fluorescence like that of the resting channel. That conformational transitions at the αδ-binding site are not tightly coupled to channel activation suggests that sequential rather than fully concerted transitions occur during receptor gating. Thus, time-resolved fluorescence changes provide a powerful probe of nAChR conformational changes.

[1]  S. Sine,et al.  Epibatidine activates muscle acetylcholine receptors with unique site selectivity. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[2]  B. Hille,et al.  Ionic channels of excitable membranes , 2001 .

[3]  B. Katz,et al.  A study of the ‘desensitization’ produced by acetylcholine at the motor end‐plate , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  J. Hainfeld,et al.  The arrangement of the subunits of the acetylcholine receptor of Torpedo californica. , 1983, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[5]  D. S. Weiss,et al.  Desensitization Mechanism of GABA Receptors Revealed by Single Oocyte Binding and Receptor Function , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  N. Unwin,et al.  Structure and action of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor explored by electron microscopy , 2003, FEBS letters.

[7]  K. Ohno,et al.  Mutation of the acetylcholine receptor α subunit causes a slow-channel myasthenic syndrome by enhancing agonist binding affinity , 1995, Neuron.

[8]  J. Merlie,et al.  Molecular basis of the two nonequivalent ligand binding sites of the muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptor , 1989, Neuron.

[9]  M B Jackson,et al.  Single channel currents in the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor: a direct demonstration of allosteric transitions. , 1994, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[10]  H P Rang,et al.  On the mechanism of desensitization at cholinergic receptors. , 1970, Molecular pharmacology.

[11]  A. Karlin,et al.  Contribution of the beta subunit M2 segment to the ion-conducting pathway of the acetylcholine receptor. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[12]  A. Karlin Ion channel structure: Emerging structure of the Nicotinic Acetylcholine receptors , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  S. Sine,et al.  Gamma- and delta-subunits regulate the affinity and the cooperativity of ligand binding to the acetylcholine receptor. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[14]  B. Hille Ion channels of excitable cells , 1992 .

[15]  T. Narahashi Ion channels of excitable cells , 1994 .

[16]  T. Sixma,et al.  Crystal structure of an ACh-binding protein reveals the ligand-binding domain of nicotinic receptors , 2001, Nature.

[17]  J. Changeux,et al.  Allosteric receptors after 30 years , 1998, Neuron.

[18]  J. W. Karpen,et al.  Ion channels: does each subunit do something on its own? , 2002, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[19]  H. Lester,et al.  An Intermediate State of the γ-Aminobutyric Acid Transporter Gat1 Revealed by Simultaneous Voltage Clamp and Fluorescence , 2000, The Journal of general physiology.

[20]  D. Koshland,et al.  Comparison of experimental binding data and theoretical models in proteins containing subunits. , 1966, Biochemistry.

[21]  H. Lester,et al.  Physiological and pharmacological manipulations with light flashes. , 1982, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[22]  F. Young Biochemistry , 1955, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[23]  D. S. Weiss,et al.  Site-specific fluorescence reveals distinct structural changes with GABA receptor activation and antagonism , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  A. Auerbach,et al.  Activation of recombinant mouse acetylcholine receptors by acetylcholine, carbamylcholine and tetramethylammonium. , 1995, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  Y. Fujiyoshi,et al.  Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor at 4.6 A resolution: transverse tunnels in the channel wall. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  F. Bezanilla,et al.  Structural Implications of Fluorescence Quenching in the Shaker K+ Channel , 1998, The Journal of general physiology.

[27]  M. Saraste,et al.  FEBS Lett , 2000 .

[28]  D. Wilkin,et al.  Neuron , 2001, Brain Research.