Coupling dynamic blow down and pool evaporation model for LNG.

Treating the dynamic effects of accidental discharges of liquefied natural gas (LNG) is important for realistic predictions of pool radius. Two phenomena have important influence on pool spread dynamics, time-varying discharge (blow down) and pool ignition. Time-varying discharge occurs because a punctured LNG tanker or storage tank drains with a decreasing liquid head and decreasing head-space pressure. Pool ignition increases the evaporation rate of a pool and consequently decreases the ultimate pool area. This paper describes an approach to treat these phenomena in a dynamic pool evaporation model. The pool evaporation model developed here has two separate regimes. Early in the spill, momentum forces dominate and the pool spreads independently of pool evaporation rate and the corresponding heat transfer rate. After the average pool depth drops below a minimum value, momentum forces are largely dissipated and the thin edges of the pool completely evaporate, so pool area is established by the heat transfer rate. The maximum extent of a burning pool is predicted to be significantly less than that of an unignited pool because the duration of the first regime is reduced by higher heat transfer rates. The maximum extent of an LNG pool is predicted to be larger upon accounting for blow down compared with using a constant average discharge rate. However, the maximum pool extent occurs only momentarily before retreating.

[1]  William Lehr,et al.  Comparison of hypothetical LNG and fuel oil fires on water. , 2004, Journal of hazardous materials.

[2]  F. T. Dodge,et al.  Revision and Experimental Verification of the Hazard Assessment Computer System Models for Spreading, Movement, Dissolution, and Dissipation of Insoluble Chemicals Spilled Onto Water. Volume 1 , 1983 .

[3]  D spanDELKA,et al.  The montoir 35m diameter LNG pool fire experiments. , 1989 .

[4]  Robin Pitblado,et al.  Consequences of liquefied natural gas marine incidents , 2005 .

[5]  Robert C. Reid,et al.  Transient boiling of liquefied cryogens on a water surface: II. Light hydrocarbon mixtures , 1975 .

[6]  J. Eyre,et al.  Radiation From Liquefied Gas Fires On Water , 1983 .

[7]  V. V. Klimenko,et al.  Film boiling on a horizontal plate — new correlation , 1981 .

[8]  Phani K. Raj,et al.  Large LNG fire thermal radiation—modeling issues and hazard criteria revisited , 2005 .

[9]  M Sam Mannan,et al.  Assessment of the effects of release variables on the consequences of LNG spillage onto water using FERC models. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[10]  Robert C. Reid,et al.  Transient boiling of liquefied cryogens on a water surface: I. Nitrogen, Methane and Ethane , 1975 .

[11]  Eulàlia Planas,et al.  Experimental study of burning rate in hydrocarbon pool fires , 2001 .

[12]  R. Reid,et al.  Boiling of liquid nitrogen and methane on water. The effect of initial water temperature , 1977 .

[13]  J A Fay,et al.  Model of spills and fires from LNG and oil tankers. , 2003, Journal of hazardous materials.

[14]  R. C. Reid,et al.  Boiling and spreading of liquid nitrogen and liquid methane on water , 1983 .

[15]  C. D. Lind,et al.  VAPOR CLOUD EXPLOSION STUDY , 1980 .

[16]  D. Burgess,et al.  HAZARDS OF SPILLAGE OF LNG INTO WATER , 1972 .

[17]  Sandia Report,et al.  Guidance on risk analysis and safety implications of a large liquefied natural gas (LNG) spill over water. , 2004 .

[18]  R. Reid,et al.  Spreading—boiling model for instantaneous spills of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) on water , 1982 .

[19]  John L. Woodward An integrated model for discharge rate, pool spread, and dispersion from punctured process vessels☆ , 1990 .