Characterization and application of 3D-printed phantoms for biophotonic imaging

The emerging technique of three-dimensional (3D) printing provides a simple, fast, and flexible way to fabricate structures with arbitrary spatial features and may prove useful in the development of standardized, phantom-based performance test methods for biophotonic imaging. Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) is commonly used in the printing process, given its low cost and strength. In this study, we evaluate 3D printing as an approach for fabricating biologically-relevant optical phantoms for hyperspectral reflectance imaging (HRI). The initial phase of this work involved characterization of absorption and scattering coefficients using spectrophotometry. The morphology of phantoms incorporating vessel-like channels with diameters on the order of hundreds of microns was examined by microscopy and OCT. A near-infrared absorbing dye was injected into channels located at a range of depths within the phantom and imaged with a near-infrared HRI system (650-1100 nm). ABS was found to have scattering coefficients comparable to biological tissue and low absorption throughout much of the visible and infrared range. Channels with dimensions on the order of the resolution limit of the 3D printer (~0.2 mm) exhibited pixelation effects as well as a degree of distortion along their edges. Furthermore, phantom porosity sometimes resulted in leakage from channel regions. Contrast-enhanced channel visualization with HRI was possible to a depth of nearly 1 mm – a level similar to that seen previously in biological tissue. Overall, our ABS phantoms demonstrated a high level of optical similarity to biological tissue. While limitations in printer resolution, matrix homogeneity and optical property tunability remain challenging, 3D printed phantoms have significant promise as samples for objective, quantitative evaluation of performance for biophotonic imaging modalities such as HRI.

[1]  B. Pogue,et al.  Review of tissue simulating phantoms for optical spectroscopy, imaging and dosimetry. , 2006, Journal of biomedical optics.

[2]  R. Landers,et al.  Biofunctional rapid prototyping for tissue‐engineering applications: 3D bioplotting versus 3D printing , 2004 .

[3]  I. Yaroslavsky,et al.  Optical properties of selected native and coagulated human brain tissues in vitro in the visible and near infrared spectral range. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  A. Welch,et al.  Determining the optical properties of turbid mediaby using the adding-doubling method. , 1993, Applied optics.

[5]  Joshua Pfefer,et al.  A review of consensus test methods for established medical imaging modalities and their implications for optical coherence tomography , 2012, BiOS.

[6]  A. N. Bashkatov,et al.  Optical properties of human skin, subcutaneous and mucous tissues in the wavelength range from 400 to 2000 nm , 2005 .

[7]  J. Welzel Optical coherence tomography in dermatology: a review , 2001, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[8]  Rajesh Kumar,et al.  Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) plastic‐based low cost tissue equivalent phantom for verification dosimetry in IMRT , 2009, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[9]  Jessica C. Ramella-Roman,et al.  Three-dimensional phantoms for curvature correction in spatial frequency domain imaging , 2012, Biomedical optics express.

[10]  Charles L. Lawson,et al.  Solving least squares problems , 1976, Classics in applied mathematics.

[11]  M. Dewhirst,et al.  Hyperspectral imaging of hemoglobin saturation in tumor microvasculature and tumor hypoxia development. , 2005, Journal of biomedical optics.