PDB_Hydro: incorporating dipolar solvents with variable density in the Poisson–Boltzmann treatment of macromolecule electrostatics

We describe a new way to calculate the electrostatic properties of macromolecules which eliminates the assumption of a constant dielectric value in the solvent region, resulting in a Generalized Poisson–Boltzmann–Langevin equation (GPBLE). We have implemented a web server () that both numerically solves this equation and uses the resulting water density profiles to place water molecules at preferred sites of hydration. Surface atoms with high or low hydration preference can be easily displayed using a simple PyMol script, allowing for the tentative prediction of the dimerization interface in homodimeric proteins, or lipid binding regions in membrane proteins. The web site includes options that permit mutations in the sequence as well as reconstruction of missing side chain and/or main chain atoms. These tools are accessible independently from the electrostatics calculation, and can be used for other modeling purposes. We expect this web server to be useful to structural biologists, as the knowledge of solvent density should prove useful to get better fits at low resolution for X-ray diffraction data and to computational biologists, for whom these profiles could improve the calculation of interaction energies in water between ligands and receptors in docking simulations.

[1]  Franci Merzel,et al.  Is the first hydration shell of lysozyme of higher density than bulk water? , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  Improving implicit solvent simulations: a Poisson-centric view. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[3]  Knapp,et al.  Protein dynamics with off-lattice Monte Carlo moves. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[4]  P. Koehl,et al.  Application of a self-consistent mean field theory to predict protein side-chains conformation and estimate their conformational entropy. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  A. Warshel,et al.  Calculations of electrostatic interactions in biological systems and in solutions , 1984, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[6]  A. Warshel,et al.  What are the dielectric “constants” of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models? , 2001, Proteins.

[7]  B. Honig,et al.  Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. , 1995, Science.

[8]  Barry Honig,et al.  Extending the Applicability of the Nonlinear Poisson−Boltzmann Equation: Multiple Dielectric Constants and Multivalent Ions† , 2001 .

[9]  M. Levitt,et al.  Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a family of designed sequences , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  D. Chandler,et al.  Hydrophobicity at Small and Large Length Scales , 1999 .

[11]  Martin Zacharias,et al.  Continuum Solvent Modeling of Nonpolar Solvation: Improvement by Separating Surface Area Dependent Cavity and Dispersion Contributions , 2003 .

[12]  J. Warwicker,et al.  Calculation of the electric potential in the active site cleft due to alpha-helix dipoles. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  M. Levitt,et al.  Theoretical studies of enzymic reactions: dielectric, electrostatic and steric stabilization of the carbonium ion in the reaction of lysozyme. , 1976, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  A. Warshel,et al.  Calculations of electrostatic energies in proteins. The energetics of ionized groups in bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  Electrostatics of nanosystems: Application to microtubules and the ribosome , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  G Klebe,et al.  Improving macromolecular electrostatics calculations. , 1999, Protein engineering.

[17]  H. Orland,et al.  Adsorption of large ions from an electrolyte solution: a modified Poisson–Boltzmann equation , 1999 .

[18]  R J Read,et al.  Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. , 1998, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[19]  B. Honig,et al.  A rapid finite difference algorithm, utilizing successive over‐relaxation to solve the Poisson–Boltzmann equation , 1991 .

[20]  R. Netz,et al.  Poisson-Boltzmann theory for membranes with mobile charged lipids and the pH-dependent interaction of a DNA molecule with a membrane. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[21]  G Bricogne,et al.  Intramolecular dielectric screening in proteins. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  Donald Bashford,et al.  Macroscopic electrostatic models for protonation states in proteins. , 2004, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[23]  A T Brünger,et al.  Protein hydration observed by X-ray diffraction. Solvation properties of penicillopepsin and neuraminidase crystal structures. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  J. Zou,et al.  Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. , 1991, Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography.

[25]  W. Delano The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System , 2002 .

[26]  Pierre Tufféry,et al.  PCE: web tools to compute protein continuum electrostatics , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[27]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  PDB2PQR: an automated pipeline for the setup of Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatics calculations , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[28]  Rob D. Coalson,et al.  Statistical Mechanics of a Multipolar Gas: A Lattice Field Theory Approach , 1996 .

[29]  G. Phillips,et al.  A global model of the protein-solvent interface. , 1994, Biophysical journal.