Abstract Modal testing of large structures is usually performed in multiple setups in order to obtain sufficiently detailed information on the mode shapes with a limited number of sensors. Several reference sensors are kept fixed during the entire measurement, while the other so-called roving sensors are moved in different setups. A careful choice of the reference and roving sensor positions is necessary for a successful modal analysis. An optimal sensor placement strategy which was developed for multi-setup modal identification is applied to the modal testing of a nearly repetitive office building. Based on the strategy the optimal reference sensor locations are designed for the building. As a comparison, badly chosen reference sensor locations are also studied. The optimal sensor placement strategy is verified by comparing the modal identification results obtained from the optimally selected reference sensor locations to those obtained from the badly chosen reference sensor locations. The experimental results show that the optimal sensor placement strategy for multi-setup modal testing allows extracting more information from the measurement. Two roving sensor strategies, i.e. a cluster and a uniform distribution of roving sensors, are also investigated. It is found that a uniform distribution of roving sensors is preferred over a cluster of roving sensors.
[1]
Paul Sas,et al.
Modal Analysis Theory and Testing
,
2005
.
[2]
Guido De Roeck,et al.
Reference-based combined deterministic–stochastic subspace identification for experimental and operational modal analysis
,
2006
.
[3]
Filipe Magalhães,et al.
Merging Strategies for Multi-Setup Operational Modal Analysis: Application to the Luiz I steel Arch Bridge
,
2009
.
[4]
D. Kammer.
Sensor Placement for On-Orbit Modal Identification and Correlation of Large Space Structures
,
1990,
1990 American Control Conference.
[5]
C. Papadimitriou,et al.
The effect of prediction error correlation on optimal sensor placement in structural dynamics
,
2012
.
[6]
F. Udwadia.
Methodology for Optimum Sensor Locations for Parameter Identification in Dynamic Systems
,
1994
.
[7]
Costas Papadimitriou,et al.
Optimal sensor placement methodology for parametric identification of structural systems
,
2004
.
[8]
M. Papadopoulos,et al.
Sensor placement methodologies for dynamic testing
,
1998
.