Frequency-constrained multi-source power system scheduling against N-1 contingency and renewable uncertainty

Abstract Security continues to be the most critical concern in power system operation, which is exceptionally important under low inertia and high uncertainty situations induced by an increasing penetration of renewable sources. This paper presents a transient frequency-constrained two-stage stochastic scheduling model to study the day-ahead operation of thermal-hydro-wind-demand response systems. Specifically, (i) limits on rate-of-change-of-frequency and maximum frequency derivation are introduced to provide sufficient governor reserve from multiple sources for guaranteeing dynamic frequency performance against N-1 contingency; (ii) The de-loaded mode of variable speed wind turbines is proposed for leveraging economics of system operation and security of dynamic frequency response; (iii) Virtual inertial constant of power systems with variable speed wind turbines is calculated to simulate performance of the virtual inertial control; (iv) Demand response is considered in the stochastic framework to mitigate the time delay of delivering virtual inertia. Multiple scenarios are generated via Monte Carlo method to simulate wind generation uncertainties. The proposed two-stage stochastic mixed-integer nonlinear programming model with binaries in both stages is solved via an improved generalized Benders decomposition, which takes about 40% less time than the standard generalized Benders decomposition. Several enhanced strategies are discussed to improve computational performance of the generalized Benders decomposition. Numerical simulations illustrate effectiveness of the proposed approach in coordinating multi-resource scheduling of power systems against N-1 contingencies and uncertainties with guaranteed frequency performance. Specifically, numerical results on the 6-bus system illustrate that: (i) The optimal wind generation penetration level of 40% could well balance the wind curtailments and the benefits of variable speed wind turbines for regulation provision; (ii) With 50% penetration of wind generation, doubling the capacity of demand response can reduce the amount of wind curtailment 50.42%, and decrease the transient frequency deviation to 0.25Hz.

[1]  Ali Mohammad Ranjbar,et al.  An Input-to-State Stability Approach to Inertial Frequency Response Analysis of Doubly-Fed Induction Generator-Based Wind Turbines , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[2]  Goran Strbac,et al.  Stochastic Scheduling With Inertia-Dependent Fast Frequency Response Requirements , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  Pierluigi Siano,et al.  A pattern recognition methodology for analyzing residential customers load data and targeting demand response applications , 2019, Energy and Buildings.

[4]  Boon-Teck Ooi,et al.  Strategies to Smooth Wind Power Fluctuations of Wind Turbine Generator , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[5]  David Infield,et al.  Power system frequency management challenges – a new approach to assessing the potential of wind capacity to aid system frequency stability , 2014 .

[6]  He Jun,et al.  Equivalent inertial time constant of doubly fed induction generator considering synthetic inertial control , 2016 .

[7]  M. O'Malley,et al.  Frequency control in competitive electricity market dispatch , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  Hedayat Saboori,et al.  Stochastic risk-averse coordinated scheduling of grid integrated energy storage units in transmission constrained wind-thermal systems within a conditional value-at-risk framework , 2016 .

[9]  F. Schweppe,et al.  Dynamic Equivalents for Average System Frequency Behavior Following Major Distribances , 1972 .

[10]  Hamed Ahmadi,et al.  Security-Constrained Unit Commitment With Linearized System Frequency Limit Constraints , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  Kangping Li,et al.  Capacity and output power estimation approach of individual behind-the-meter distributed photovoltaic system for demand response baseline estimation , 2019, Applied Energy.

[12]  Zhiqiang Jiang,et al.  Runoff forecast uncertainty considered load adjustment model of cascade hydropower stations and its application , 2018, Energy.

[13]  Li Sun,et al.  On Inertial Dynamics of Virtual-Synchronous-Controlled DFIG-Based Wind Turbines , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[14]  Jianzhong Zhou,et al.  Credibility theory based panoramic fuzzy risk analysis of hydropower station operation near the boundary , 2018, Journal of Hydrology.

[15]  P. M. Anderson,et al.  A low-order system frequency response model , 1990 .

[16]  Tim Schulze,et al.  The value of stochastic programming in day-ahead and intra-day generation unit commitment , 2016 .

[17]  Hua Ye,et al.  Analytical Modeling of Inertial and Droop Responses From a Wind Farm for Short-Term Frequency Regulation in Power Systems , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[18]  Goran Strbac,et al.  Simultaneous Scheduling of Multiple Frequency Services in Stochastic Unit Commitment , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[19]  Gao Yuan,et al.  Participation in primary frequency regulation of wind turbines using hybrid control method , 2018 .

[20]  Jinye Zhao,et al.  Variable Resource Dispatch Through Do-Not-Exceed Limit , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[21]  M. Behrangrad A review of demand side management business models in the electricity market , 2015 .

[22]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  A Lagrangean decomposition approach for oil supply chain investment planning under uncertainty with risk considerations , 2013, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[23]  Sudipta Ghosh,et al.  Doubly Fed Induction Generator (DFIG)-Based Wind Farm Control Framework for Primary Frequency and Inertial Response Application , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[24]  Mohammad Shahidehpour,et al.  Primary frequency response based rescheduling for enhancing microgrid resilience , 2019, Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy.

[25]  Josep M. Guerrero,et al.  A Virtual Inertia Control Strategy for DC Microgrids Analogized With Virtual Synchronous Machines , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[26]  Joao P. S. Catalao,et al.  Daily pattern prediction based classification modeling approach for day-ahead electricity price forecasting , 2019, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems.

[27]  Jiangmeng Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of Demand Response Resource Aggregation System Capacity Under Uncertainty , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[28]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Considering wind speed correlation of WECS in reliability evaluation using the time-shifting technique , 2009 .

[29]  Fei Wang,et al.  Smart Households’ Aggregated Capacity Forecasting for Load Aggregators Under Incentive-Based Demand Response Programs , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[30]  Seyed M. Madani,et al.  Analytical evaluation of control strategies for participation of doubly fed induction generator-based wind farms in power system short-term frequency regulation , 2014 .

[31]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  A generalized Benders decomposition-based branch and cut algorithm for two-stage stochastic programs with nonconvex constraints and mixed-binary first and second stage variables , 2019, Journal of Global Optimization.

[32]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Allocation of Hourly Reserve Versus Demand Response for Security-Constrained Scheduling of Stochastic Wind Energy , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[33]  Víctor Manuel Fernandes Mendes,et al.  Stochastic coordination of joint wind and photovoltaic systems with energy storage in day-ahead market , 2017 .

[34]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  An improved L-shaped method for two-stage convex 0-1 mixed integer nonlinear stochastic programs , 2018, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[35]  Magnus Perninge,et al.  A Stochastic Optimal Power Flow Problem With Stability Constraints—Part I: Approximating the Stability Boundary , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[36]  M. Tajeddini,et al.  Risk averse optimal operation of a virtual power plant using two stage stochastic programming , 2014 .

[37]  Chuan He,et al.  Day-ahead stochastic coordinated scheduling for thermal-hydro-wind-photovoltaic systems , 2019, Energy.

[38]  Ross Baldick,et al.  Governor Rate-Constrained OPF for Primary Frequency Control Adequacy , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[39]  F.D. Galiana,et al.  Unit commitment with primary frequency regulation constraints , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[40]  H. Banakar,et al.  Kinetic Energy of Wind-Turbine Generators for System Frequency Support , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.