Robotic surgery training with commercially available simulation systems in 2011: a current review and practice pattern survey from the society of urologic robotic surgeons.

OBJECTIVES Virtual reality (VR) simulation has the potential to standardize surgical training for robotic surgery. We sought to evaluate all commercially available VR robotic simulators. MATERIALS AND METHODS A MEDLINE(®) literature search was performed of all applicable keywords. Available VR simulators were evaluated with regard to face, content, and construct validation. Additionally, a survey was e-mailed to all members of the Endourological Society, querying the pervasiveness of VR simulators in robotic surgical training. Finally, each company was e-mailed to ask for a price quote for their respective system. RESULTS There are four VR robotic surgical simulators currently available: RoSS™, dV-Trainer™, SEP Robot™, and da Vinci(®) Skills Simulator™. Each system is represented in the literature and all possess varying degrees of face, content, and construct validity. Although all systems have basic skill sets with performance analysis and metrics software, most do not contain procedural components. When evaluating the results of our survey, most respondents did not possess a VR simulator although almost all believed there to be great potential for these devices in robotic surgical training. With the exception of the SEP Robot, all VR simulators are similar in price. CONCLUSIONS VR simulators have a definite role in the future of robotic surgical training. Although the simulators target technical components of training, their largest impact will be appreciated when incorporated into a comprehensive educational curriculum.

[1]  R. Sweet,et al.  Simulation and computer-animated devices: the new minimally invasive skills training paradigm. , 2008, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[2]  R. Satava,et al.  Virtual Reality Training Improves Operating Room Performance: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blinded Study , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[3]  G. Dunnington,et al.  The New ACS/APDS Skills Curriculum: Moving the Learning Curve Out of the Operating Room , 2008, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[4]  G. Fried,et al.  Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. , 1998, American journal of surgery.

[5]  A. Moinzadeh,et al.  Face, content, and construct validity of dV-trainer, a novel virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery. , 2009, Urology.

[6]  T. Kesavadas,et al.  Face validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator. , 2010, Urology.

[7]  M P Schijven,et al.  The SEP "robot": a valid virtual reality robotic simulator for the Da Vinci Surgical System? , 2010, Surgical technology international.

[8]  Thenkurussi Kesavadas,et al.  Content validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator , 2011, BJU international.

[9]  Frances Lawrenz,et al.  A unified approach to validation, reliability, and education study design for surgical technical skills training. , 2010, Archives of surgery.

[10]  J. Denstedt,et al.  Ureteroscopy and cystoscopy simulation in urology. , 2007, Journal of endourology.

[11]  Kathleen A. Johnson,et al.  Support for Simulation-based Surgical Education through American College of Surgeons – Accredited Education Institutes , 2008, World Journal of Surgery.

[12]  Virtual reality surgical simulation for lower urinary tract endourologic surgery. , 1999, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[13]  John D Denstedt,et al.  A randomized, controlled, prospective study validating the acquisition of percutaneous renal collecting system access skills using a computer based hybrid virtual reality surgical simulator: phase I. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[14]  R. M. Satava,et al.  Fundamental principles of validation, and reliability: rigorous science for the assessment of surgical education and training , 2003, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[15]  Kanav Kahol,et al.  Effect of short-term pretrial practice on surgical proficiency in simulated environments: a randomized trial of the "preoperative warm-up" effect. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[16]  Chandru P Sundaram,et al.  Validation of a novel virtual reality robotic simulator. , 2009, Journal of endourology.

[17]  Thomas S. Lendvay,et al.  Initial validation of a virtual-reality robotic simulator , 2008, Journal of robotic surgery.

[18]  J. J. Jakimowicz,et al.  Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[19]  Daniel B. Jones.  Video trainers, simulation and virtual reality: a new paradigm for surgical training. , 2007, Asian journal of surgery.

[20]  Edward D Matsumoto,et al.  Virtual reality ureteroscopy simulator as a valid tool for assessing endourological skills , 2006, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[21]  D Bergqvist,et al.  Self-assessment of technical skill in surgery: the need for expert feedback. , 2008, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[22]  Timothy M. Kowalewski,et al.  Face, content and construct validity of the University of Washington virtual reality transurethral prostate resection trainer. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[23]  M. Lerner,et al.  Does training on a virtual reality robotic simulator improve performance on the da Vinci surgical system? , 2010, Journal of endourology.