Evaluating IS usage in Malaysian small and medium‐sized firms using the technology acceptance model

The current research investigates the impact of persona‐system characteristics, technical backing, and computing skill on information systems (IS) usage by Malaysian small and medium firms (SMF) using the TAM. The study hypothesizes that persona‐system characteristics (such as perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use) and usage of systems will be greater when there is greater computing skill and strong technical backing. A total of 177 firms responded to the survey and the results show that there is a positive relationship between computing skill and technical backing on one hand and IS usage directly, and indirectly via perceived usefulness and ease of use on the other. Usage is influenced directly by usefulness and indirectly (via usefulness) by ease of use. These findings are particularly crucial to system designers and vendors targeting SMF, as well as, to information systems management in SMF. Important theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

[1]  Daniel E. Sichel,et al.  The Computer Revolution: An Economic Perspective , 1997 .

[2]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Modeling the Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use , 1994, ICIS.

[3]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[4]  William R. Swinyard,et al.  Attitude-Behavior Consistency: The Impact of Product Trial versus Advertising: , 1983 .

[5]  J. Bettman,et al.  Effects of Framing on Evaluation of Comparable and Noncomparable Alternatives by Expert and Novice Consumers , 1987 .

[6]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model , 1997, MIS Q..

[7]  R. Bagozzi.  Attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A test of some key hypotheses. , 1981 .

[8]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication , 1992, MIS Q..

[9]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[10]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technologies , 1997 .

[12]  Bernadette Szajna,et al.  Software Evaluation and Choice: Predictive Validation of the Technology Acceptance Instrument , 1994, MIS Q..

[13]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  User acceptance of microcomputer technology: An empirical test , 1993 .

[14]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[15]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  Thomas K. Landauer,et al.  Trouble with Computers: Usefulness, Usability, and Productivity , 1996 .

[17]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Factors of New Technology Adoption in the Retail Sector , 1994 .

[18]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[19]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Investigating the Support Role of the Information Center , 1990, MIS Q..

[22]  E. Rosch,et al.  Categorization of Natural Objects , 1981 .

[23]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[24]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[25]  Paul B. Cragg,et al.  Small-Firm Computing: Motivators and Inhibitors , 1993, MIS Q..

[26]  William R. King,et al.  Impacts of End-User and Information Center Characteristics on End-User Computing Support , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[28]  M. Zanna,et al.  Direct Experience And Attitude-Behavior Consistency , 1981 .

[29]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness , 1993 .

[30]  L Olfman,et al.  End‐user software training: an experimental comparison of methods to enhance motivation , 1991, Inf. Syst. J..

[31]  J. Webster,et al.  Flow in Computer-Mediated Communication , 1992 .

[32]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[33]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Testing the Determinants of Microcomputer Usage via a Structural Equation Model , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[34]  A. Adam.  Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[35]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  A Longitudinal Investigation of Personal Computers in Homes: Adoption Determinants and Emerging Challenges , 2001, MIS Q..