Dynamism in gene expression across multiple studies.

In this study we develop methods of examining gene expression dynamics, how and when genes change expression, and demonstrate their application in a meta-analysis involving over 29,000 microarrays. By defining measures across many experimental conditions, we have a new way of characterizing dynamics, complementary to measures looking at changes in absolute variation or breadth of tissues showing expression. We show conservation in overall patterns of dynamism across three species (human, mouse, and rat) and show associations with known disease-related genes. We discuss the enriched functional properties of the sets of genes showing different patterns of dynamics and show that the differences in expression dynamics is associated with the variety of different transcription factor regulatory sites. These results can influence thinking about the selection of genes for microarray design and the analysis of measurements of mRNA expression variation in a global context of expression dynamics across many conditions, as genes that are rarely differentially expressed between experimental conditions may be the subject of increased scrutiny when they significantly vary in expression between experimental subsets.

[1]  David Bryder,et al.  Transcription factor profiling in individual hematopoietic progenitors by digital RT-PCR , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Liqing Zhang,et al.  Housekeeping and tissue-specific genes differ in simple sequence repeats in the 5'-UTR region. , 2008, Gene.

[3]  Laurent Duret,et al.  Relationship between gene expression and GC-content in mammals: statistical significance and biological relevance. , 2005, Human molecular genetics.

[4]  L. Mularoni,et al.  Housekeeping genes tend to show reduced upstream sequence conservation , 2007, Genome Biology.

[5]  M. Campbell,et al.  PANTHER: a library of protein families and subfamilies indexed by function. , 2003, Genome research.

[6]  Alan F. Scott,et al.  Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), a knowledgebase of human genes and genetic disorders , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[7]  G. Pruijn,et al.  Conserved features of Y RNAs revealed by automated phylogenetic secondary structure analysis. , 1999, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  M. DePamphilis,et al.  HUMAN DISEASE , 1957, The Ulster Medical Journal.

[9]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Drug—target network , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  T. Hudson,et al.  Control genes and variability: absence of ubiquitous reference transcripts in diverse mammalian expression studies. , 2002, Genome research.

[11]  J. Davis Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Solutions Using R and Bioconductor , 2007 .

[12]  G. Stephanopoulos,et al.  A compendium of gene expression in normal human tissues. , 2001, Physiological genomics.

[13]  Atul Butte,et al.  The use and analysis of microarray data , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[14]  A. Vinogradov Compactness of human housekeeping genes: selection for economy or genomic design? , 2004, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[15]  A. Barabasi,et al.  The human disease network , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Rainer Breitling,et al.  Rank products: a simple, yet powerful, new method to detect differentially regulated genes in replicated microarray experiments , 2004, FEBS letters.

[17]  L. Duret,et al.  Determinants of substitution rates in mammalian genes: expression pattern affects selection intensity but not mutation rate. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[18]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  Low rates of expression profile divergence in highly expressed genes and tissue-specific genes during mammalian evolution. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[19]  D. Cooper,et al.  Human Gene Mutation Database , 1996, Human Genetics.

[20]  Rafael A Irizarry,et al.  Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. , 2003, Biostatistics.

[21]  Araxi O. Urrutia,et al.  A unification of mosaic structures in the human genome. , 2003, Human molecular genetics.

[22]  M. King,et al.  Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees. , 1975, Science.

[23]  Pablo Tamayo,et al.  Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  John D. Storey,et al.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Dennis B. Troup,et al.  NCBI GEO: mining tens of millions of expression profiles—database and tools update , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[26]  Wen-Hsiung Li,et al.  Mammalian housekeeping genes evolve more slowly than tissue-specific genes. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.

[27]  M. Ostrowski,et al.  Distinct Transcriptional Profiles in Ex Vivo CD4+ and CD8+ T Cells Are Established Early in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection and Are Characterized by a Chronic Interferon Response as Well as Extensive Transcriptional Changes in CD8+ T Cells , 2007, Journal of Virology.

[28]  J. Bergh,et al.  Identification of molecular apocrine breast tumours by microarray analysis , 2005, Breast Cancer Research.

[29]  K. Becker,et al.  The Genetic Association Database , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[30]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[31]  S. Ohno An argument for the genetic simplicity of man and other mammals , 1972 .

[32]  S. Bicciato,et al.  Molecular classification of multiple myeloma: a distinct transcriptional profile characterizes patients expressing CCND1 and negative for 14q32 translocations. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  Alexander A. Morgan,et al.  FitSNPs: highly differentially expressed genes are more likely to have variants associated with disease , 2008, Genome Biology.

[34]  David S. Wishart,et al.  DrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[35]  R. Irizarry,et al.  Gene expression analysis of ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy: shared and distinct genes in the development of heart failure. , 2005, Physiological genomics.

[36]  G. Parmigiani,et al.  The Analysis of Gene Expression Data , 2003 .

[37]  Dietmar E. Martin,et al.  Rank Difference Analysis of Microarrays (RDAM), a novel approach to statistical analysis of microarray expression profiling data , 2004, BMC Bioinformatics.

[38]  Maqc Consortium The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[39]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  S. S. Koh,et al.  Identification of novel universal housekeeping genes by statistical analysis of microarray data. , 2007, Journal of biochemistry and molecular biology.

[41]  L. Duret,et al.  Nature and structure of human genes that generate retropseudogenes. , 2000, Genome research.

[42]  A. Butte,et al.  Further defining housekeeping, or "maintenance," genes Focus on "A compendium of gene expression in normal human tissues". , 2001, Physiological genomics.

[43]  A. Butte,et al.  AILUN: reannotating gene expression data automatically , 2007, Nature Methods.

[44]  Y. Nishida,et al.  Housekeeping and tissue-specific genes in mouse tissues , 2007, BMC Genomics.

[45]  W. Kamps,et al.  Evidence Based Selection of Housekeeping Genes , 2007, PloS one.

[46]  Sudhir Kumar,et al.  Gene Expression Intensity Shapes Evolutionary Rates of the Proteins Encoded by the Vertebrate Genome , 2004, Genetics.

[47]  Jacob de Vlieg,et al.  PhyloPat: phylogenetic pattern analysis of eukaryotic genes , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[48]  Jeffrey M. Trimarchi,et al.  Transcription: Sibling rivalry in the E2F family , 2002, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.