BETWEEN BROADCASTING POLITICAL MESSAGES AND INTERACTING WITH VOTERS

Politicians across Western democracies are increasingly adopting and experimenting with Twitter, particularly during election time. The purpose of this article is to investigate how candidates are using it during an election campaign. The aim is to create a typology of the various ways in which candidates behaved on Twitter. Our research, which included a content analysis of tweets (n = 26,282) from all twittering Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrat candidates (n = 416) during the 2010 UK General Election campaign, focused on four aspects of tweets: type, interaction, function and topic. By examining candidates' twittering behaviour, the authors show that British politicians mainly used Twitter as a unidirectional form of communication. However, there were a group of candidates who used it to interact with voters by, for example, mobilizing, helping and consulting them, thus tapping into the potential Twitter offers for facilitating a closer relationship with citizens.

[1]  P. Dylak Time to get serious. , 1996, Nursing times.

[2]  J. Blumler,et al.  The Third Age of Political Communication: Influences and Features , 1999 .

[3]  Ivor Gaber Government by spin: an analysis of the process , 1999 .

[4]  Jochen Peter,et al.  Reliability in Cross-National Content Analysis , 2002 .

[5]  James Stanyer,et al.  Political Parties, the Internet and the 2005 General Election: From Web Presence to E-Campaigning? , 2005 .

[6]  Stephen Coleman,et al.  New mediation and direct representation: reconceptualizing representation in the digital age , 2005, New Media Soc..

[7]  Nigel Jackson,et al.  Political parties, the Internet and the 2005 General Election: third time lucky? , 2007, Internet Res..

[8]  Donley T. Studlar,et al.  One Europe, Many Electorates? , 2007 .

[9]  Tamara A. Small Equal Access, Unequal Success — Major and Minor Canadian Parties On the Net , 2008 .

[10]  J. Blumler,et al.  The Internet and Democratic Citizenship: Theory, Practice and Policy , 2009 .

[11]  Nic Newman,et al.  #UKelection2010, mainstream media and the role of the internet: how social and digital media affected the business of politics and journalism , 2010 .

[12]  Jennifer Golbeck,et al.  Twitter use by the U.S. Congress , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  Andy Williamson,et al.  Citizen participation in the e-campaign , 2010 .

[14]  A. Hermida TWITTERING THE NEWS , 2010 .

[15]  W. Grant,et al.  Digital Dialogue? Australian Politicians' use of the Social Network Tool Twitter , 2010 .

[16]  Tamara A. Small Canadian Politics in 140 Characters: Party Politics in the Twitterverse , 2010 .

[17]  Jacob R. Straus,et al.  Social Networking and Constituent Communications: Member Use of Twitter During a Two-Month Period in the 111th Congress , 2010 .

[18]  J. Blumler,et al.  Media Coverage of the Prime Ministerial Debates , 2011 .

[19]  Øystein Sæbø,et al.  Understanding TwitterTM Use among Parliament Representatives: A Genre Analysis , 2011, ePart.

[20]  Tamara A. Small WHAT THE HASHTAG? , 2011 .

[21]  Ivor Gaber The Transformation of Campaign Reporting: The 2010 UK General Election, Revolution or Evolution? , 2011 .

[22]  David Cutts,et al.  Constituency Campaigning in 2010 , 2011 .

[23]  D. Lilleker,et al.  Microblogging, Constituency Service and Impression Management: UK MPs and the Use of Twitter , 2011, The Impact of Legislatures.

[24]  David Deacon,et al.  Reporting the 2010 General Election: Old Media, New Media — Old Politics, New Politics , 2011 .

[25]  D. Jackson Strategic Media, Cynical Public? Examining the Contingent Effects of Strategic News Frames on Political Cynicism in the United Kingdom , 2011 .

[26]  Todd Graham What’s Reality Television Got to Do with it? Talking Politics in the Net-Based Public Sphere , 2011 .

[27]  Anders Olof Larsson,et al.  Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign , 2012, New Media Soc..

[28]  A. Bruns,et al.  (NOT) THE TWITTER ELECTION , 2012 .

[29]  Scott Wright,et al.  Politics as usual? Revolution, normalization and a new agenda for online deliberation , 2012, New Media Soc..

[30]  M. Broersma,et al.  SOCIAL MEDIA AS BEAT , 2012 .

[31]  B. Loader,et al.  What the hashtag? A content analysis of Canadian politics on Twitter TAMARA A . SMALL , 2012 .

[32]  Maurice Vergeer,et al.  Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning , 2013 .

[33]  Julian Ausserhofer,et al.  NATIONAL POLITICS ON TWITTER , 2013 .

[34]  Daniel Jackson Political communication in Britain: The leader debates, the campaign and the media in the 2010 general election , 2013 .

[35]  M. Molesworth,et al.  Performance, Politics, and Media: How the 2010 British General Election Leadership Debates Generated “Talk” Among the Electorate , 2013 .

[36]  D. Lilleker,et al.  Online Political Communication Strategies: MEPs, E-Representation, and Self-Representation , 2013 .

[37]  Marcel Broersma,et al.  Closing the gap? : Twitter as an instrument for connected representation , 2013 .

[38]  The “Hollowed-Out Election,” or Where Did All the Policy Go? , 2013 .

[39]  Eun-Ju Lee,et al.  When the Medium Is the Message , 2014, Commun. Res..

[40]  Kevin Wallsten Microblogging and the News: Political Elites and the Ultimate Retweet , 2014 .