Testing the accuracy of DEA estimates under endogeneity through a Monte Carlo simulation

Endogeneity, and the distortions on the estimation of economic models that it causes, is a usual problem in the econometrics literature. Although non-parametric methods like Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) are among the most used techniques for measuring technical efficiency, the effects of such problem on efficiency estimates have received little attention. The aim of this paper is to alert DEA practitioners about the accuracy of their estimates under the presence of endogeneity. For this, first we illustrate the endogeneity problem and its causes in production processes and its implications for the efficiency measurement from a conceptual perspective. Second, using synthetic data generated in a Monte Carlo experiment we evaluate how different levels of positive and negative endogeneity can impair DEA estimations. We conclude that, although DEA is robust to negative endogeneity, a high positive endogeneity level, i.e., the existence of a high positive correlation between one input and the true efficiency level, might bias severely DEA estimates.

[1]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Pitfalls and protocols in DEA , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  S. Bretschneider,et al.  Estimating school efficiency: A comparison of methods using simulated data , 2001 .

[3]  Richard Blundell,et al.  Endogeneity in Nonparametric and Semiparametric Regression Models , 2022 .

[4]  Daniel Santín,et al.  Does school ownership matter? An unbiased efficiency comparison for regions of Spain , 2014 .

[5]  Ludger Woessmann,et al.  Econometric methods for causal evaluation of education policies and practices: a non‐technical guide , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[6]  Chris D. Orme,et al.  The Potential for Endogeneity Bias in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1996 .

[7]  John Ruggiero,et al.  Impact Assessment of Input Omission on Dea , 2005, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[8]  Tim Coelli,et al.  Testing procedures for detection of linear dependencies in efficiency models , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  W. Greene,et al.  A stochastic frontier model with correction for sample selection , 2008 .

[10]  Stuart Bretschneider,et al.  Response to comment on estimating school efficiency , 2003 .

[11]  A. Tsybakov,et al.  Efficient Estimation of Monotone Boundaries , 1995 .

[12]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .

[13]  Jens J. Krüger,et al.  A Monte Carlo study of old and new frontier methods for efficiency measurement , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  D. Solís,et al.  Soil Conservation and Technical Efficiency Among Hillside Farmers in Central America: A Switching Regression Model , 2007 .

[15]  David J. Mayston,et al.  Measuring and managing educational performance , 2003, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[16]  Andrew L. Johnson,et al.  Guidelines for using variable selection techniques in data envelopment analysis , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis as Nonparametric Least-Squares Regression , 2010, Oper. Res..

[18]  Arnold Reisman,et al.  Content analysis of data envelopment analysis literature and its comparison with that of other OR/MS fields , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[19]  E. Mammen,et al.  On estimation of monotone and concave frontier functions , 1999 .

[20]  R. Banker Maximum likelihood, consistency and data envelopment analysis: a statistical foundation , 1993 .

[21]  Timo Kuosmanen Representation Theorem for Convex Nonparametric Least Squares , 2008, Econometrics Journal.

[22]  W. Greene,et al.  Technical efficiency analysis correcting for biases from observed and unobserved variables: an application to a natural resource management project , 2012 .

[23]  D. U. A. Galagedera,et al.  Experimental evidence on robustness of data envelopment analysis , 2003, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[24]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[25]  C. Alexander,et al.  Technology Adoption and Technical Efficiency: Organic and Conventional Dairy Farms in the United States , 2010 .

[26]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach , 1999 .

[27]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  ASYMPTOTICS AND CONSISTENT BOOTSTRAPS FOR DEA ESTIMATORS IN NONPARAMETRIC FRONTIER MODELS , 2008, Econometric Theory.

[28]  Daniel Santín,et al.  Measuring educational efficiency at student level with parametric stochastic distance functions: an application to Spanish PISA results , 2011 .

[29]  Peter Smith,et al.  Model misspecification in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[30]  John Ruggiero,et al.  Comment on estimating school efficiency , 2003 .

[31]  F Pedraja-Chaparro,et al.  On the quality of the data envelopment analysis model , 1999, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[32]  H. Essid,et al.  Small is not that beautiful after all: measuring the scale efficiency of Tunisian high schools using a DEA-bootstrap method , 2013 .

[33]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[34]  Dale W. Jorgenson,et al.  CONJUGATE DUALITY AND THE TRANSCENDENTAL LOGARITHMIC FUNCTION , 1971 .