A service delivery platform for server management services

Computer server management is an important component of the global IT (information technology) services business. The providers of server management services face unrelenting efficiency challenges in order to remain competitive with other providers. Server system administrators (SAs) represent the majority of the workers in this industry, and their primary task is server management. Since system administration is a highly skilled position, the costs of employing such individuals are high, and thus, the challenge is to increase their efficiency so that a given SA can manage larger numbers of servers. In this paper, we describe a widely deployed Service Delivery Portal (SDP) in use throughout the Server Systems Operations business of IBM that provides a set of well-integrated technologies to help SAs perform their tasks more efficiently. The SDP is based on three simple design principles: 1) user interface aggregation, 2) data aggregation, and 3) knowledge centralization. This paper describes the development of the SDP from the vantage point of these three basic design principles along with lessons learned and the impact assessed from studying the behavior of SAs with and without the tool.

[1]  David A. Patterson,et al.  A Simple Way to Estimate the Cost of Downtime , 2002, LISA.

[2]  Jimeng Sun,et al.  SCOOP: Automated Social Recommendation in Enterprise Process Management , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing.

[3]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Learning in Doing: Social, , 1987 .

[4]  Alexandra Durcikova,et al.  The Role of Knowledge Repositories in Technical Support Environments: Speed Versus Learning in User Performance , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Knowledge Management Metrics: A Review and Directions for Future Research , 2005, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[6]  Eser Kandogan,et al.  Security Administrators: A Breed Apart , 2007 .

[7]  Eser Kandogan,et al.  Activity-based management of IT service delivery , 2007, CHIMIT '07.

[8]  Daniel M. Russell,et al.  Learning to see, seeing to learn: visual aspects of sensemaking , 2003, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[9]  Dave Patterson,et al.  Researching system administration , 2002 .

[10]  David Carmel,et al.  Juru at TREC 10 - Experiments with Index Pruning , 2001, TREC.

[11]  John H. Bailey,et al.  Usable autonomic computing systems: the administrator's perspective , 2004, International Conference on Autonomic Computing, 2004. Proceedings..

[12]  Jeffrey O. Kephart,et al.  The Vision of Autonomic Computing , 2003, Computer.

[13]  Pavel Zezula,et al.  Similarity Search: The Metric Space Approach (Advances in Database Systems) , 2005 .

[14]  Eser Kandogan,et al.  Field studies of computer system administrators: analysis of system management tools and practices , 2004, CSCW.

[15]  Ben J Hicks,et al.  European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work , 2009 .

[16]  Eben M. Haber,et al.  Design guidelines for system administration tools developed through ethnographic field studies , 2007, CHIMIT '07.

[17]  Ajay Kulkarni,et al.  Building Agent-Based Intelligent Workspaces , 2002, International Conference on Internet Computing.

[18]  David Carmel,et al.  eResponder: Electronic Question Responder , 2000, CoopIS.

[19]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  What a to-do: studies of task management towards the design of a personal task list manager , 2004, CHI.

[20]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[21]  Víctor M. González,et al.  Managing Currents of Work: Multi-tasking among Multiple Collaborations , 2005, ECSCW.

[22]  L. Perlow.  The Time Famine: Toward a Sociology of Work Time , 1999 .

[23]  D. Wellman,et al.  Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. , 1997 .

[24]  Petr Jan Horn,et al.  Autonomic Computing: IBM's Perspective on the State of Information Technology , 2001 .

[25]  Peter B. Seddon.  A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[26]  R. Sabherwal.  Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants1 , 2006 .

[27]  Jesús Favela,et al.  Understanding and supporting personal activity management by IT service workers , 2008, CHiMiT '08.

[28]  Nicole F. Velasquez,et al.  Work practices of system administrators: implications for tool design , 2008, CHiMiT '08.

[29]  Noah Treuhaft,et al.  Recovery Oriented Computing (ROC): Motivation, Definition, Techniques, and Case Studies , 2002 .

[30]  Charles Chowa,et al.  Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[31]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  PROCEDURES AND PROBLEMS IN THE OFFICE , 1984 .

[32]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[33]  J. Orr,et al.  Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. , 1997 .

[34]  Nicole F. Velasquez,et al.  Designing Tools for System Administrators: An Empirical Test of the Integrated User Satisfaction Model , 2008, LISA.

[35]  Philip Smith.  Roger Bakeman John M. Gottman , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  Arun Rai,et al.  Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  Clay Spinuzzi,et al.  Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1997 .

[38]  Pavel Zezula,et al.  Similarity Search - The Metric Space Approach , 2005, Advances in Database Systems.