Effectiveness of Various Enhancement Strategies to Complement Animated Instruction: A Meta-Analytic Assessment

Animation of various types has been used increasingly in different disciplines in computer-based learning environments to facilitate achievements of different kinds of learning objectives. However, the result of empirical animation studies has been mixed and mostly discouraging. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to examine the instructional effectiveness of different types of enhancement strategies used to complement animated instruction. Eleven hundred and twenty-four college-level students participated in 12 independent experimental studies. The uniqueness of this meta-analysis lies in the fact that the instructional content and four independent criterion measures were held constant in all studies. One hundred and twenty-four effect sizes were calculated. The results indicate that when “conventional” one dimensional animation strategies are employed to complement animated instruction, small to moderate effect sizes are realized and that the various enhancement strategies were not equally effective in facilitating different types of educational objectives.

[1]  Joseph W. Rigney,et al.  Pictorial Presentation and Review Strategies in Science Learning. , 1981 .

[2]  Khusro Kidwai,et al.  Effects of Varied Animation Strategies in Facilitating Animated Instruction , 2005 .

[3]  Lih-Juan ChanLin.  Attributes of Animation for Learning Scientific Knowledge , 2000 .

[4]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[5]  L. Hedges,et al.  The Handbook of Research Synthesis , 1995 .

[6]  Khusro Kidwai,et al.  Effect of Visual Scaffolding and Animation on Students? Performance on Measures of Higher Order Learning , 2005 .

[7]  William R. Shadish,et al.  Combining estimates of effect size. , 1994 .

[8]  Ok-choon Park,et al.  Selective use of animation and feedback in computer-based instruction , 1992 .

[9]  Michael F. Young,et al.  Instructional design for situated learning , 1993 .

[10]  Francis M. Dwyer,et al.  The Effect of Varied Cueing Strategies in Complementing Animated Visual Imagery in Facilitating Achievement of Different Educational Objectives , 2005 .

[11]  Khusro Kidwai,et al.  The Effect of Visual Statement and Question Advance Organizers in Complementing Animated Instruction in a Web-based environment on Undergraduate Student Achievement of Different Educational Objectives , 2004 .

[12]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Effects of textual and animated orienting activities and practice on learning from computer-based instruction , 1988 .

[13]  Xiao-Hua Zhou,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta‐Analysis , 2008 .

[14]  Nada Dabbagh,et al.  Scaffolding: An important teacher competency in online learning , 2003 .

[15]  Graham Cooper,et al.  Research into Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design at UNSW , 2008 .

[16]  D. Ausubel.  The psychology of meaningful verbal learning : an introduction to school learning / David P. Ausubel , 1963 .

[17]  William A. King,et al.  A Comparison of Three Combinations of Text and Graphics for Concept Learning. Technical Report 76-16. , 1975 .

[18]  G. Glass.  Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research1 , 1976 .

[19]  Michael Szabo,et al.  An Experimental Study of Animation, Mathematics Achievement, and Attitude Toward Computer-Assisted Instruction , 1996 .

[20]  Ingram Olkin,et al.  Estimation of a Single Effect Size: Parametric and Nonparametric Methods , 1985 .

[21]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[22]  R. Mayer,et al.  Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening , 2002 .

[23]  R. Coe,et al.  Effectiveness of Consultation on Student Ratings Feedback: A Meta-Analysis , 2004 .

[24]  R. Mayer,et al.  The instructive animation: helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning , 1992 .

[25]  G. Glass,et al.  Meta-analysis in social research , 1981 .

[26]  Khusro Kidwai,et al.  The Effect Of Oral Description In Complementing Animated Instruction In A Web-based Learning Environment On Undergraduate Students Achievement Of Different Educational Objectives , 2005 .

[27]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Judgments of natural and anomalous trajectories in the presence and absence of motion. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  Francis M. Dwyer,et al.  The Effect of Computer-Generated Animation on Student Achievement of Different Types of Educational Objectives , 1996 .

[29]  Francis M. Dwyer,et al.  Effect of Varied Animated Enhancement Strategies in Facilitating Achievement of Different Educational Objectives. , 2004 .

[30]  C. Stone,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Advance Organizer Studies , 1983 .

[31]  Joel B. Greenhouse,et al.  Sensitivity analysis and diagnostics. , 1994 .

[32]  Francis M. Dwyer,et al.  The effect of different chunking strategies in complementing animated instruction , 2007 .

[33]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  Effect of computer graphics on improving estimates to algebra word problems. , 1985 .

[34]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning: The Role of Modality and Contiguity , 1999 .

[35]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. , 2001 .

[36]  Four Tips to Manage Cognitive Overload , 2003 .

[37]  A. Paivio.  Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach , 1986 .

[38]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Animation, incidental learning, and continuing motivation , 1991 .

[39]  Michael Pressley,et al.  The Challenges of Instructional Scaffolding: The Challenges of Instruction That Supports Student Thinking. , 1996 .

[40]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  The effects of computer animation on adult learning and retrieval tasks , 1990 .

[41]  S. Järvelä,et al.  The cognitive apprenticeship model in a technologically rich learning environment: Interpreting the learning interaction , 1995 .

[42]  P. Chandler,et al.  THE SPLIT‐ATTENTION EFFECT AS A FACTOR IN THE DESIGN OF INSTRUCTION , 1992 .

[43]  Zita M Simutis,et al.  The Instructional Effectiveness of Three Levels of Graphics Displays for Computer-Assisted Instruction. , 1979 .

[44]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  Quantitative synthesis of social psychological research. , 2000 .

[45]  G. Hanley.  e‐Learning and the Science of Instruction , 2004 .

[46]  C. Penney.  Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[47]  Susan M. Land,et al.  Grounded practice and the design of constructivist learning environments , 1997 .

[48]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  The Effects of Computer Animated Elaboration Strategies and Practice on Factual and Application Learning in an Elementary Science Lesson , 1989 .

[49]  H A Simon,et al.  How Big Is a Chunk? , 1974, Science.