Ka-Band Radar Cross-Section of Breaking Wind Waves

The effective normalized radar cross section (NRCS) of breaking waves, σwb, is empirically derived based on joint synchronized Ka-band radar and video records of the sea surface from a research tower. The σwb is a key parameter that, along with the breaker footprint fraction, Q, defines the contribution of non-polarized backscattering, NP =σwbQ, to the total sea surface NRCS. Combined with the right representation of the regular Bragg and specular backscattering components, the NP component is fundamental to model and interpret sea surface radar measurements. As the first step, the difference between NRCS values for breaking and non-breaking conditions is scaled with the optically-observed Q and compared with the geometric optics model of breaker backscattering. Optically-derived Q might not be optimal to represent the effect of breaking waves on the radar measurements. Alternatively, we rely on the breaking crest length that is firmly detected by the video technique and the empirically estimated breaker decay (inverse wavelength) scale in the direction of breaking wave propagation. A simplified model of breaker NRCS is then proposed using the geometric optics approach. This semi-analytical model parameterizes the along-wave breaker decay from reported breaker roughness spectra, obtained in laboratory experiments with mechanically-generated breakers. These proposed empirical breaker NRCS estimates agree satisfactorily with observations.

[1]  Takuji Waseda,et al.  Correlation of hydrodynamic features with LGA radar backscatter from breaking waves , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[2]  D. Walker Experimentally motivated model for low grazing angle radar Doppler spectra of the sea surface , 2000 .

[3]  Irina Sergievskaya,et al.  Suppression of Wind Ripples and Microwave Backscattering Due to Turbulence Generated by Breaking Surface Waves , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[4]  Olga V. Shomina,et al.  On the Doppler Frequency Shifts of Radar Signals Backscattered from the Sea Surface , 2014 .

[5]  W. Kendall Melville,et al.  An experimental and numerical study of parasitic capillary waves , 1998 .

[6]  V. Kudryavtsev,et al.  Empirical Model of Radar Scattering in the 3-cm Wavelength Range on the Sea at Wide Incidence Angles , 2018, Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics.

[7]  William J. Plant,et al.  The Modulation Transfer Function: Concept and Applications , 1989 .

[8]  Robert E. McIntosh,et al.  Measurement and classification of low-grazing-angle radar sea spikes , 1998 .

[9]  Guy A. Meadows,et al.  Radar backscatter from mechanically generated transient breaking waves. II. Azimuthal and grazing angle dependence , 2001 .

[10]  A. Voronovich,et al.  Theoretical model for scattering of radar signals in K u - and C-bands from a rough sea surface with breaking waves , 2001 .

[11]  Bertrand Chapron,et al.  Low-Frequency Sea Surface Radar Doppler Echo , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[12]  D. R. Lyzenga,et al.  Radar backscatter from mechanically generated transient breaking waves. I. Angle of incidence dependence and high resolution surface morphology , 2001 .

[13]  Bertrand Chapron,et al.  Sea Surface Ka-Band Doppler Measurements: Analysis and Model Development , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[14]  K. Dagestad,et al.  Simulation of radar backscatter and Doppler shifts of wave-current interaction in the presence of strong tidal current , 2012 .

[15]  Takuji Waseda,et al.  Measurements of the Doppler spectra of breaking waves , 2007 .

[16]  K. L. Beach,et al.  Scattering from breaking gravity waves without wind , 1998 .

[17]  Ernesto Rodriguez,et al.  On the Optimal Design of Doppler Scatterometers , 2018, Remote. Sens..