Real-time Monitoring of Autonomous Vehicle's Time Gap Variations: A Bayesian Framework

This paper proposes a novel monitoring methodology for car-following control of automated vehicles that uses real-time measurements of spacing and velocity obtained through vehicle sensors. This study focuses on monitoring the time gap, a key parameter that dictates the desired following spacing of the controlled vehicle. The goal is to monitor deviations in actual time gap from a desired setting and detect when it deviates beyond a control limit. A random coefficient modeling is developed to systematically capture the stochastic distribution of the time gap and derive a closed-form Bayesian updating scheme for real-time inference. A control chart is then adopted to systematically set the control limits and inform when the time gap setting should be changed. Simulation experiments are performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposes method for monitoring the time gap and alerting when the parameter setting needs to be changed.

[1]  A. Elwany,et al.  Real-Time Estimation of Mean Remaining Life Using Sensor-Based Degradation Models , 2009 .

[2]  Steven E Shladover,et al.  Modeling cooperative and autonomous adaptive cruise control dynamic responses using experimental data , 2014 .

[3]  F. Hsieh,et al.  Joint Modeling of Survival and Longitudinal Data: Likelihood Approach Revisited , 2006, Biometrics.

[4]  Soyoung Ahn,et al.  Receding Horizon Stochastic Optimal Control Strategy for ACC and CACC under Uncertainty , 2017 .

[5]  Swaroop Darbha,et al.  Intelligent Cruise Control Systems And Traffic Flow Stability , 1998 .

[6]  Vicente Milanés Montero,et al.  Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control in Real Traffic Situations , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[7]  Steven E Shladover Effects of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Traffic Flow: Testing Drivers' Choices of Following Distances , 2009 .

[8]  Steven E Shladover,et al.  Impacts of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Freeway Traffic Flow , 2012 .

[9]  Meng Wang,et al.  Rolling horizon control framework for driver assistance systems. Part I: Mathematical formulation and non-cooperative systems , 2014 .

[10]  Perry Y. Li,et al.  Traffic flow stability induced by constant time headway policy for adaptive cruise control vehicles , 2002 .

[11]  Rajesh Rajamani,et al.  An Experimental Comparative Study of Autonomous and Co-operative Vehicle-follower Control Systems , 2001 .

[12]  Petros A. Ioannou,et al.  A Comparision of Spacing and Headway Control Laws for Automatically Controlled Vehicles1 , 1994 .

[13]  Yang Zhou,et al.  Robust local and string stability for a decentralized car following control strategy for connected automated vehicles , 2019, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[14]  Gábor Orosz,et al.  Consensus and disturbance attenuation in multi‐agent chains with nonlinear control and time delays , 2017 .

[15]  J. Hedrick,et al.  String stability of interconnected systems , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 American Control Conference - ACC'95.

[16]  R. Happee,et al.  Delay-compensating strategy to enhance string stability of adaptive cruise controlled vehicles , 2018 .

[17]  Vicente Milanés Montero,et al.  Cooperative controllers for highways based on human experience , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..