Assessment of the Vision-specific Quality of Life Using Clustered Visual Field in Glaucoma Patients

Purpose:To investigate the significance of vision-specific quality of life (QOL) in glaucoma patients based on the location of visual field defects. Patients and Methods:We examined 336 eyes of 168 patients. The 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire was used to evaluate patients’ QOL. Visual field testing was performed using the Humphrey Field Analyzer; the visual field was divided into 10 clusters. We defined the eye with better mean deviation as the better eye and the fellow eye as the worse eye. A single linear regression analysis was applied to assess the significance of the relationship between QOL and the clustered visual field. Results:The strongest correlation was observed in the lower paracentral visual field in the better eye. The lower peripheral visual field in the better eye also showed a good correlation. Correlation coefficients in the better eye were generally higher than those in the worse eye. For driving, the upper temporal visual field in the better eye was the most strongly correlated (r=0.509). For role limitation and peripheral vision, the lower peripheral visual field in the better eye had the highest correlation coefficients at 0.459 and 0.425, respectively. Conclusions:Overall, clusters in the lower hemifield in the better eye were more strongly correlated with QOL than those in the worse eye. In particular, the lower paracentral visual field in the better eye was correlated most strongly of all. Driving, however, strongly correlated with the upper hemifield in the better eye.

[1]  K. Ball,et al.  Vision impairment, eye disease, and injurious motor vehicle crashes in the elderly. , 1998, Ophthalmic epidemiology.

[2]  S. Fukuhara,et al.  Psychometric properties of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25), Japanese version , 2005, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[3]  L. A. Chiasson,et al.  Risk of falls and motor vehicle collisions in glaucoma. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  R. Hays,et al.  Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ). NEI-VFQ Field Test Investigators , 1998 .

[5]  M. Araie,et al.  The relationship between visual disability and visual field in patients with glaucoma. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[6]  L. A. Chiasson,et al.  Glaucoma and on-road driving performance. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  C. O'brien,et al.  Quality of Life in Glaucoma and Its Relationship with Visual Function , 2003, Journal of glaucoma.

[8]  J Caprioli,et al.  Comparison of visual field defects in the low-tension glaucomas with those in the high-tension glaucomas. , 1984, American journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  H. Jampel,et al.  Glaucoma Patients' Assessment of Their Visual Function and Quality of Life , 2002, Journal of glaucoma.

[10]  M. Araie,et al.  Comparison of visual field defects between normal-tension and primary open-angle glaucoma in the late stage of the disease , 1995, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[11]  R. P. Mills,et al.  Correlation of quality of life with clinical symptoms and signs at the time of glaucoma diagnosis. , 1998, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[12]  H. Abe,et al.  Evaluation of the relationship between quality of vision and the visual function index in Japanese glaucoma patients , 2011, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[13]  W. Feuer,et al.  Visual function and quality of life among patients with glaucoma. , 1997, Archives of ophthalmology.

[14]  Yasuo Ohashi,et al.  Sectorization of the Central 30° Visual Field in Glaucoma , 1993 .

[15]  R. Hays,et al.  Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. , 2001, Archives of ophthalmology.

[16]  C Owsley,et al.  Identifying the content area for the 51-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire: results from focus groups with visually impaired persons. , 1998, Archives of ophthalmology.

[17]  D. Garway-Heath,et al.  Mapping the visual field to the optic disc in normal tension glaucoma eyes. , 2000, Ophthalmology.

[18]  F Dannheim,et al.  The topographical relationship between optic disc and visual field in glaucoma , 1990, Acta ophthalmologica.

[19]  S. Azen,et al.  Impact of Visual Field Loss on Health Related Quality of Life in Glaucoma Participants. The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study (LALES) , 2007 .

[20]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Influence of glaucomatous visual field loss on health-related quality of life. , 1997, Archives of ophthalmology.

[21]  M. Ávila,et al.  Quality of life in glaucoma patients: Regression analysis and correlation with possible modifiers , 2004, Ophthalmic epidemiology.

[22]  Douglas R. Anderson Automated Static Perimetry , 1992 .

[23]  C. Owsley,et al.  Visual field defects and the risk of motor vehicle collisions among patients with glaucoma. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[24]  B Esterman,et al.  Functional scoring of the binocular field. , 1982, Ophthalmology.

[25]  B. Bengtsson,et al.  A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression. , 2008, American journal of ophthalmology.