Quick and dirty technology assessment: The case of an Italian Research Centre

Abstract Technology assessment has an increasingly critical role to play, in light of the fact that technology is the ultimate source of competitive advantage for companies, and of economic and social development for nations. In this paper, we present a methodology for a “quick and dirty” technology assessment, developed with reference to a real-word case study. The case in question is that of a large Italian Research Centre, whose top management required a rapid assessment of the technological competences, resources and results of the organisation. Because technology assessment is inherently highly complex, the problem consisted in reducing the complexity to obtain a simple methodology that could be rapidly deployed in practice. In summary, this paper: (i) describes a methodology for a “quick and dirty” technology assessment, effectively implemented in practice; (ii) points out the main problems/difficulties encountered and the possible solutions; (iii) discusses the results and the validity/applicability of the formulated methodology.

[1]  Klas Eric Soderquist,et al.  Use and impact of performance measurement results in R&D and NPD: an exploratory study , 2004 .

[2]  Philip J. Vergragt,et al.  Traditional and Modern Technology Assessment: Toward a Toolkit , 1998 .

[3]  L. G. Soete,et al.  The use of foreign patenting as an internationally comparable science and technology output indicator , 2005, Scientometrics.

[4]  Vittorio Chiesa,et al.  R & D strategy and organisation , 2001 .

[5]  Tony Davila,et al.  An empirical study on the drivers of management control systems' design in new product development , 2000 .

[6]  William E. Halal,et al.  The George Washington University Forecast of Emerging Technologies A Continuous Assessment of the Technology Revolution , 1998 .

[7]  Mathias M. Coburn,et al.  Supporting Strategy With Competitive Analysis , 2002 .

[8]  Robert Phaal,et al.  Technology management in manufacturing business: process and practical assessment , 1998 .

[9]  Frank Vanclay,et al.  The International Handbook of Social Impact Assessment , 2003 .

[10]  A. Fusfeld,et al.  Assessing the Value of Your Technology , 1995 .

[11]  Josée C.M. Van Eijndhoven,et al.  Technology assessment: Product or process? , 1997 .

[12]  Malgorzata Goralczyk,et al.  Life-cycle assessment in the renewable energy sector , 2003 .

[13]  Shu-Hsien Liao,et al.  Knowledge transfer and competitive advantage on environmental uncertainty: An empirical study of the Taiwan semiconductor industry , 2007 .

[14]  Ulf Sandström,et al.  Institutionalizing the triple helix: research funding and norms in the academic system , 2000 .

[15]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Implementing a strategy-driven performance measurement system for an applied research group , 2002 .

[16]  Fred B. Wood.  Lessons in technology assessment , 1997 .

[17]  Soung Hie Kim,et al.  A qualitative cross-impact approach to find the key technology , 1997 .

[18]  P. Coughlan,et al.  Development of a technical innovation audit , 1996 .

[19]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[20]  Daniel Spreng.  Technology assessment: Impact of high-tech engineering research on energy consumption , 2002 .

[21]  Nieves L. Diaz-Diaz,et al.  Technological Knowledge Assets in Industrial Firms , 2006 .

[22]  Ari-Pekka Hameri,et al.  Mutually benefiting joint innovation process between industry and big-science , 2006 .

[23]  Chris Pappas.  Strategic management of technology , 1984 .

[24]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Assessment of Flemish R&D in the field of information technology: A bibliometric evaluation based on publication and patent data, combined with OECD research input statistics , 1998 .

[25]  Fytton Rowland,et al.  Knowledge management in a public organization: a study on the relationship between organizational elements and the performance of knowledge transfer , 2004, J. Knowl. Manag..

[26]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[27]  Alec McMillan.  Roadmapping-Agent of Change: Implementation of a Technology Roadmapping Process Resulted in the Systematic Integration of Technology Management Processes within Rockwell Automation , 2003 .

[28]  M. Trajtenberg.  A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[29]  K. Ramanathan,et al.  Technological capability assessment as an input for strategic planning: Case studies at Electricité de France and Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand , 1997 .

[30]  Steven T. Walsh,et al.  The measurement of technical competencies , 2002 .

[31]  B. Martin.  Foresight in science and technology , 1995 .

[32]  Ronald Zhao,et al.  Transition in R&D management control system: Case study of a biotechnology research institute in China , 2003 .

[33]  Andrew Cooke,et al.  Design principles for the development of measurement systems for research and development processes , 1997 .

[34]  Nawaz Sharif,et al.  Understanding and acquiring technology assets for global competition , 2007 .

[35]  G. Tichy.  Over-Optimism Among Experts in Assessment and Foresight , 2002 .

[36]  Federico Frattini,et al.  TOWARDS A SYSTEM OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR RESEARCH ACTIVITIES: NIKEM RESEARCH CASE STUDY , 2006 .

[37]  D. Y. Sha,et al.  Linking innovative product development with customer knowledge: a data-mining approach , 2006 .

[38]  Robert Phaal,et al.  From theory to practice: challenges in operationalising a technology selection framework , 2006 .

[39]  A. Kameoka,et al.  A challenge of integrating technology foresight and assessment in industrial strategy development and policymaking , 2004 .

[40]  S. Cunningham,et al.  Technology futures analysis: Toward integration of the field and new methods , 2004 .

[41]  K. Debackere,et al.  Measuring Progress and Evolution in Science and Technology - Ii: The Multiple Uses of Technometric Indicators , 2002 .