An identifiable model of two-stage learning☆

Abstract An eleven-parameter model for two-stage learning is developed. The model's principal advantage over extant two-stage models is that its parameter space is completely identifiable, thereby eliminating the tedious procedure of locating acceptable identifying restrictions. Identifiability is achieved by defining the model over a slightly modified outcome space. Following the identifiability proof, the necessary statistical machinery for parameter estimation, goodness-of-fit analyses, and hypothesis testing is presented. These latter developments are illustrated with data from an adult cued recall experiment and a free recall experiment with elementary school children.

[1]  J. Theios,et al.  SIMPLE CONDITIONING AS TWO-STAGE ALL-OR-NONE LEARNING. , 1963, Psychological review.

[2]  J Theios,et al.  A Markov model for classical conditioning: Application to eye-blink conditioning in rabbits. , 1966, Psychological review.

[3]  A. Paivio,et al.  Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  H. Halff The Role of Opportunities for Recall in Learning to Retrieve. , 1977 .

[5]  Mark L. Howe,et al.  Developmental Invariance in a Mathematical Model of Associative Learning. , 1980 .

[6]  Charles J. Brainerd,et al.  Structural Invariance in the Developmental Analysis of Learning , 1983 .

[7]  M. Powell A Survey of Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization , 1970 .

[8]  Gregg T. Vesonder,et al.  Knowledge of one's own responding and the relation of such knowledge to learning: A developmental study☆ , 1978 .

[9]  J. Theios The mathematical structure of reversal learning in a shock-escape T-maze: Overtraining and successive reversals , 1965 .

[10]  James G. Greeno,et al.  Paired-associate learning with short-term retention: Mathematical analysis and data regarding identification of parameters ☆ , 1967 .

[11]  C. Brainerd,et al.  Interpreting Associative-Learning Stages. , 1980 .

[12]  James G. Greeno,et al.  A cognitive interpretation of negative transfer and forgetting of paired associates , 1971 .

[13]  H. Chernoff,et al.  The Use of Maximum Likelihood Estimates in {\chi^2} Tests for Goodness of Fit , 1954 .

[14]  J. Greeno,et al.  Matrix analysis of identifiability of some finite markov models , 1971 .

[15]  W. Kintsch,et al.  APPLICATION OF A MARKOV MODEL TO FREE RECALL AND RECOGNITION. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  Gustav Levine,et al.  Mathematical model techniques for learning theories , 1972 .

[17]  Robert Hooke,et al.  `` Direct Search'' Solution of Numerical and Statistical Problems , 1961, JACM.

[18]  Mark L. Howe,et al.  Stages-of-learning analysis of picture-word effects in associative memory. , 1981 .

[19]  P. Polson,et al.  Statistical methods for absorbing Markov-chain models for learning: Estimation and identification , 1974 .

[20]  C. Brainerd Children’s Concept Learning as Rule-Sampling Systems with Markovian Properties , 1982 .

[21]  Charles J. Brainerd Markovian Interpretations of Conservation Learning. , 1979 .

[22]  James G. Greeno,et al.  Interpretation of the two-stage analysis of paired-associate memorizing☆ , 1970 .

[23]  Peter G. Polson,et al.  Statistical methods for a general theory of all-or-none learning , 1970 .

[24]  C. Brainerd,et al.  The general theory of two-stage learning: A mathematical review with illustrations from memory development. , 1982 .

[25]  J. Greeno,et al.  Markovian processes with identifiable states: General considerations and application to all-or-none learning , 1964 .

[26]  C. Brainerd,et al.  Stages-of-learning analysis of developmental interactions in memory, with illustrations from developmental interactions in picture-word effects☆ , 1982 .

[27]  J. Greeno Identifiability and statistical properties of two-stage learning with no successes in the initial stage , 1968, Psychometrika.

[28]  E. H. Cornell,et al.  A Learning Analysis of Spatial Concept Development in Infancy , 1983 .

[29]  H. Halff Parameterizations of Markov models for two-stage learning☆ , 1976 .