A Remotely Controlled Transformable Soft Robot Based on Engineered Cardiac Tissue Construct.

Many living organisms undergo conspicuous or abrupt changes in body structure, which is often accompanied by a behavioral change. Inspired by the natural metamorphosis, robotic systems can be designed as reconfigurable to be multifunctional. Here, a tissue-engineered transformable robot is developed, which can be remotely controlled to assume different mechanical structures for switching locomotive function. The soft robot is actuated by a muscular tail fin that emulates the swimming of whales and works as a cellular engine powered by the synchronized contraction of striated cardiac microtissue constructs. For a transition of locomotive behavior, the robot can be optically triggered to transform from a spread to a retracted form, which effectively changes the bending stiffness of the tail fins, thus minimizing the propulsion output from the "tail fin" and effectively switching off the engine. With the unprecedented controllability and responsiveness, the transformable robot is implemented to work as a cargo carrier for programmed delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to selectively eradicate cancer cells. It is believed that the realization of the transformable concept paves a pathway for potential development of intelligent biohybrid robotic systems.

[1]  Yongfeng Mei,et al.  Mechanical Self-Assembly of a Strain-Engineered Flexible Layer: Wrinkling, Rolling, and Twisting , 2015 .

[2]  Chia-Hung Chen,et al.  Gradient Porous Elastic Hydrogels with Shape‐Memory Property and Anisotropic Responses for Programmable Locomotion , 2015 .

[3]  Mir Jalil Razavi,et al.  The Formation and Evolution of Creased Morphologies Using Reactive Diffusion in Ultrathin Polymer Brush Platforms , 2017 .

[4]  Salvador Pané,et al.  Soft micromachines with programmable motility and morphology , 2016, Nature Communications.

[5]  K. Hill,et al.  Motility and more: the flagellum of Trypanosoma brucei , 2014, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[6]  M. Sitti,et al.  Microemulsion-Based Soft Bacteria-Driven Microswimmers for Active Cargo Delivery. , 2017, ACS nano.

[7]  J. Losos,et al.  Supplementary Materials for Rapid evolution of a native species following invasion by a congener , 2014 .

[8]  Runhuai Yang,et al.  Multiplexed Optogenetic Stimulation of Neurons with Spectrum‐Selective Upconversion Nanoparticles , 2017, Advanced healthcare materials.

[9]  Kevin Welsher,et al.  Deep-tissue anatomical imaging of mice using carbon nanotube fluorophores in the second near-infrared window , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Filip Ilievski,et al.  Multigait soft robot , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  A. Malik,et al.  Electrical method for detection of endothelial cell shape change in real time: assessment of endothelial barrier function. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Carmel Majidi,et al.  Nonlinear geometric effects in mechanical bistable morphing structures. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[13]  N. Kamamichi,et al.  Earthworm muscle driven bio-micropump , 2017 .

[14]  Jinhwan Yoon,et al.  Local switching of chemical patterns through light-triggered unfolding of creased hydrogel surfaces. , 2012, Angewandte Chemie.

[15]  Bingzhe Xu,et al.  Cell Generator: A Self‐Sustaining Biohybrid System Based on Energy Harvesting from Engineered Cardiac Microtissues , 2017 .

[16]  Ying Wang,et al.  Tetherless near-infrared control of brain activity in behaving animals using fully implantable upconversion microdevices. , 2017, Biomaterials.

[17]  Cecilia Laschi,et al.  Soft robotics: a bioinspired evolution in robotics. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[18]  Ritu Raman,et al.  Optogenetic skeletal muscle-powered adaptive biological machines , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Megan L. McCain,et al.  A tissue-engineered jellyfish with biomimetic propulsion , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  A. Leshansky,et al.  Swimming by reciprocal motion at low Reynolds number , 2014, Nature Communications.

[21]  Nam Hoon Kim,et al.  Reversible morphological transformation between polymer nanocapsules and thin films through dynamic covalent self-assembly. , 2015, Angewandte Chemie.

[22]  Assaf Shapira,et al.  Modular assembly of thick multifunctional cardiac patches , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  G M Bokoch,et al.  Membrane and morphological changes in apoptotic cells regulated by caspase-mediated activation of PAK2. , 1997, Science.

[24]  B. Williams,et al.  A self-propelled biohybrid swimmer at low Reynolds number , 2014, Nature Communications.

[25]  Oliver G. Schmidt,et al.  Development of a Sperm‐Flagella Driven Micro‐Bio‐Robot , 2013, Advanced materials.

[26]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  Engineered nanomembranes for directing cellular organization toward flexible biodevices. , 2013, Nano letters.

[27]  Oliver G. Schmidt,et al.  Dynamic Polymeric Microtubes for the Remote‐Controlled Capture, Guidance, and Release of Sperm Cells , 2016, Advanced materials.

[28]  Ritu Raman,et al.  Three-dimensionally printed biological machines powered by skeletal muscle , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  S. Ko,et al.  Hybrid-Actuating Macrophage-Based Microrobots for Active Cancer Therapy , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[30]  Ming Liu,et al.  Core-Shell-Shell Upconversion Nanoparticles with Enhanced Emission for Wireless Optogenetic Inhibition. , 2018, Nano letters.

[31]  J L West,et al.  Independent Optical Control of Microfluidic Valves Formed from Optomechanically Responsive Nanocomposite Hydrogels , 2005, Advanced materials.

[32]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Self-assembled insect muscle bioactuators with long term function under a range of environmental conditions. , 2014, RSC advances.

[33]  J. Pawelek,et al.  Bacteria as tumour-targeting vectors. , 2003, The Lancet. Oncology.

[34]  R. Pfeifer,et al.  Self-Organization, Embodiment, and Biologically Inspired Robotics , 2007, Science.

[35]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Muscular Thin Films for Building Actuators and Powering Devices , 2007, Science.

[36]  D. Rus,et al.  Design, fabrication and control of soft robots , 2015, Nature.

[37]  Samuel Sanchez,et al.  Stimuli-Responsive Microjets with Reconfigurable Shape , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[38]  Jeong-Woo Choi,et al.  Phototactic guidance of a tissue-engineered soft-robotic ray , 2016, Science.

[39]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots , 2016, Nature.

[40]  Paolo Dario,et al.  Biohybrid actuators for robotics: A review of devices actuated by living cells , 2017, Science Robotics.

[41]  M. C. Stuart,et al.  Emerging applications of stimuli-responsive polymer materials. , 2010, Nature materials.

[42]  Ritu Raman,et al.  Damage, Healing, and Remodeling in Optogenetic Skeletal Muscle Bioactuators , 2017, Advanced healthcare materials.

[43]  Martha A. Grover,et al.  Shape Selection and Multi-stability in Helical Ribbons , 2013, 1312.3571.

[44]  Peter Kohl,et al.  Electrotonic coupling of excitable and nonexcitable cells in the heart revealed by optogenetics , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  M. Medina‐Sánchez,et al.  Swimming Microrobots: Soft, Reconfigurable, and Smart , 2018 .