Analysis of solvent flux through nanofiltration membranes by mechanistic, chemometric and hybrid modelling

Abstract This paper addresses the modelling of the transport of solvents through nanofiltration (NF) membranes. Experimental data generated by the authors and collected from other published studies of 32 different solvent–membrane systems was used for comprehensive model validation. It was found that the most used mechanistic models are not sufficiently general to cover such a wide range of membrane–solvent systems. A set of alternative membrane and solvent descriptors was defined based on published studies, in order to improve the modelling of this system. Since the relationship between the solvent flux and the new selected descriptors is currently not known or poorly known at the mechanistic level, alternative chemometric and hybrid chemometric–mechanistic modelling methodologies were adopted. The main results that can be withdrawn from this study are the following. The analysis of the data by Projection to Latent Structures (PLS) showed that solvent flux through NF membranes could be mainly related to bulk solvent properties such as viscosity and density, and to membrane MWCO. The solvent–membrane systems were classified into clusters of systems with similar properties on the basis of the two most important latent variables. Among the model structures studied, the hybrid solution-diffusion/PLS model was determined to be the best approach for predicting solvent permeability data. For this latter model, the analysis of descriptors contribution showed that the dipole moment, Hildebrand solubility parameter, dielectric constant and ellipsoidal ratio were able to capture up to 40% of variance of the solution-diffusion model residuals. Among these the dipole moment introduced the highest improvement. This model can be further improved by designing new experiments outside the identified membrane–solvent clusters.

[1]  David Hasson,et al.  Effect of solvent properties on permeate flow through nanofiltration membranes: Part II. Transport model , 2000 .

[2]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Multimodel Inference , 2004 .

[3]  Andrzej Anderko,et al.  Computation of dielectric constants of solvent mixtures and electrolyte solutions , 2001 .

[4]  Salvador García Muñoz,et al.  Data-based latent variable methods for process analysis, monitoring and control , 2005, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[5]  Matthias Wessling,et al.  Insight into the transport of hexane-solute systems through tailor-made composite membranes , 2004 .

[6]  Norbert Adolph Lange,et al.  Handbook of chemistry , 1944 .

[7]  E. S. Tarleton,et al.  New experimental measurements of solvent induced swelling in nanofiltration membranes , 2005 .

[8]  Andrew G. Livingston,et al.  Solvent transport in organic solvent nanofiltration membranes , 2005 .

[9]  S. Wold,et al.  PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics , 2001 .

[10]  B. Van der Bruggen,et al.  Polymeric nanofiltration of binary water-alcohol mixtures : Influence of feed composition and membrane properties on permeability and rejection , 2005 .

[11]  David Hasson,et al.  Effect of solvent properties on permeate flow through nanofiltration membranes. Part I: investigation of parameters affecting solvent flux , 1999 .

[12]  H. Leuenberger,et al.  A novel approach to the characterization of polar liquids. Part 2: binary mixtures. , 2002, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[13]  A novel approach to the characterization of polar liquids. Part 1: pure liquids. , 2001, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[14]  J. Robinson,et al.  The influence of polarity on flux and rejection behaviour in solvent resistant nanofiltration—Experimental observations , 2006 .

[15]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[16]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Neural networks for pattern recognition , 1995 .

[17]  Allan F. M. Barton,et al.  CRC Handbook of solubility parameters and other cohesion parameters , 1983 .

[18]  Malou M-Louise Haine,et al.  De Smet L. , 1986 .

[19]  B. Van der Bruggen,et al.  Fluxes and rejections for nanofiltration with solvent stable polymeric membranes in water, ethanol and n-hexane , 2002 .

[20]  Koen De Smet,et al.  Physico-chemical interpretation of the SRNF transport mechanism for solutes through dense silicone membranes , 2004 .

[21]  J. G. Wijmans,et al.  The solution-diffusion model: a review , 1995 .

[22]  Dibakar Bhattacharyya,et al.  Performance of solvent-resistant membranes for non-aqueous systems: solvent permeation results and modeling , 2001 .

[23]  Donald R Paul,et al.  Reformulation of the solution-diffusion theory of reverse osmosis , 2004 .

[24]  Lloyd S. White,et al.  Transport properties of a polyimide solvent resistant nanofiltration membrane , 2002 .

[25]  Van P. Carey,et al.  The properties of gases & liquids: 4th Edition. Robert C. Reid, John M. Prausnitz, and Bruce E. Poling, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY, 1987, 741 pages, $49.50. , 1988 .

[26]  H. Zarei Densities, excess molar volumes and partial molar volumes of the binary mixtures of acetic acid+alkanol (C1-C4) at 298.15 K , 2007 .

[27]  J.L.C. Santos,et al.  Effect of solute geometry and orientation on the rejection of uncharged compounds by nanofiltration , 2006 .

[28]  Theodora Kourti,et al.  Process analysis, monitoring and diagnosis, using multivariate projection methods , 1995 .

[29]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[30]  Andrew G. Livingston,et al.  Effect of solute concentration and mass transfer limitations on transport in organic solvent nanofiltration : partially rejected solute , 2006 .

[31]  E. S. Tarleton,et al.  Solvent flux through dense polymeric nanofiltration membranes , 2004 .

[32]  Analysis of protein filtration data by PLS regression , 2002 .

[33]  Mark A. Kramer,et al.  Modeling chemical processes using prior knowledge and neural networks , 1994 .

[34]  A. Barton Handbook of Poylmer-Liquid Interaction Parameters and Solubility Parameters , 1990 .

[35]  B. Van der Bruggen,et al.  Transport model for solvent permeation through nanofiltration membranes , 2006 .