Invited commentary: quality of care and the volume-outcome relationship--what's next for surgery?

[1]  E. Hannan,et al.  The influence of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality for colectomy, gastrectomy, and lung lobectomy in patients with cancer. , 2002, Surgery.

[2]  M. Chassin,et al.  The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. , 1998, JAMA.

[3]  K. Davis,et al.  The cost of health system change: public discontent in five nations. , 1999, Health affairs.

[4]  Russell L. Stogsdill,et al.  A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. , 1996, JAMA.

[5]  A. Donabedian,et al.  The quality of care. How can it be assessed? , 1988, JAMA.

[6]  R H Brook,et al.  Managed care is not the problem, quality is. , 1997, JAMA.

[7]  D. Petitti,et al.  Interpreting the Volume–Outcome Relationship in the Context of Cancer Care , 2001 .

[8]  E L Hannan,et al.  Improving the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State. , 1994, JAMA.

[9]  S. Jencks.  Clinical performance measurement--a hard sell. , 2000, JAMA.

[10]  A. Wall,et al.  Book ReviewTo Err is Human: building a safer health system Kohn L T Corrigan J M Donaldson M S Washington DC USA: Institute of Medicine/National Academy Press ISBN 0 309 06837 1 $34.95 , 2000 .

[11]  F. Grover,et al.  The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. , 1998, Annals of surgery.