An Assist-as-Needed Controller for Robotic Rehabilitation Therapy Based on RBF Network

The rehabilitation training with active involvement and efforts of impaired subjects can enhance the outcome of rehabilitation therapies. To promote patients’ voluntary engagement, a variety of assist as needed (AAN) controllers have been proposed for robot-aided therapy. However, patients’ impairment level is not taken into account in the implementation of those control schemes. In this study, a novel AAN controller is developed for upper limb rehabilitation therapy. The control paradigm uses Gaussian radial basis function (RBF) network to learn the model of subjects’ motor capability in workspace. The update of weight vectors of RBF network is based on a greedy strategy, which has the potential to promote subjects’ voluntary engagement by providing task challenge for them. Considering the difference in the impairment degree of patients, the assistance and impedance level of robot control is regulated based on the task performance of patients. The results of experiments at four healthy subjects verify the feasibility and adaptability of the proposed AAN controller.

[1]  Vincent S. Huang,et al.  Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[2]  Ashish D. Deshpande,et al.  Assist-as-Needed Controllers for Index Finger Module of a Hand Exoskeleton for Rehabilitation , 2015 .

[3]  S. Micera,et al.  Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[4]  Ali Utku Pehlivan,et al.  A Subject-Adaptive Controller for Wrist Robotic Rehabilitation , 2015, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[5]  N. Hogan,et al.  Motions or muscles? Some behavioral factors underlying robotic assistance of motor recovery. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[6]  K. Mauritz,et al.  Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand , 1995, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[7]  Loredana Zollo,et al.  Patient-tailored adaptive robotic system for upper-limb rehabilitation , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Zeng-Guang Hou,et al.  Dynamic modeling and control of a parallel upper-limb rehabilitation robot , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[9]  M. Munih,et al.  Psychophysiological Measurements in a Biocooperative Feedback Loop for Upper Extremity Rehabilitation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  T. Poggio,et al.  Networks and the best approximation property , 1990, Biological Cybernetics.

[11]  J. Kleim,et al.  Neural Plasticity: The Biological Substrate For Neurorehabilitation , 2010, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[12]  B. Wünsche,et al.  Assessment of movement quality in robot- assisted upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a review , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[13]  W. Harwin,et al.  Multivariate analysis of the Fugl-Meyer outcome measures assessing the effectiveness of GENTLE/S robot-mediated stroke therapy , 2007, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[14]  Marcia Kilchenman O'Malley,et al.  Minimal Assist-as-Needed Controller for Upper Limb Robotic Rehabilitation , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[15]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  Rehabilitation Robotics: Performance-Based Progressive Robot-Assisted Therapy , 2003, Auton. Robots.

[16]  Marcia Kilchenman O'Malley,et al.  Maintaining subject engagement during robotic rehabilitation with a minimal assist-as-needed (mAAN) controller , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[17]  Loredana Zollo,et al.  Dynamic Adaptive System for Robot-Assisted Motion Rehabilitation , 2016, IEEE Systems Journal.

[18]  Robert Riener,et al.  Performance-based viscous force field adaptation in upper limb strength training for stroke patients , 2016, 2016 6th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).

[19]  H. Krebs,et al.  Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[20]  Renaud Ronsse,et al.  Performance-based robotic assistance during rhythmic arm exercises , 2016, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[21]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Optimizing Compliant, Model-Based Robotic Assistance to Promote Neurorehabilitation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[22]  Eric T. Wolbrecht,et al.  Adaptive control with state-dependent modeling of patient impairment for robotic movement therapy , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[23]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Real-time computer modeling of weakness following stroke optimizes robotic assistance for movement therapy , 2007, 2007 3rd International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering.

[24]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  MUNDUS project: MUltimodal Neuroprosthesis for daily Upper limb Support , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.