Interpretable reparameterisations of citation models

[1]  Barbara Żogała-Siudem,et al.  Validating citation models by proxy indices , 2022, J. Informetrics.

[2]  Barbara Żogała-Siudem,et al.  Ockham’s index of citation impact , 2022, Scientometrics.

[3]  M. Gagolewski,et al.  Power laws, the Price model, and the Pareto type-2 distribution , 2022, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[4]  Xueqi Cheng,et al.  Hu-index: a Unified Index to Quantify Individuals across Disciplines , 2021, Scientometrics.

[5]  Gonzalo Huerta Cánepa,et al.  Robust h-index , 2021, Scientometrics.

[6]  M. Gagolewski,et al.  Three dimensions of scientific impact , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  P. Zhang,et al.  Some indices violating the basic domination relation , 2017, Scientometrics.

[8]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  The discretised lognormal and hooked power law distributions for complete citation data: Best options for modelling and regression , 2016, J. Informetrics.

[9]  Sergey N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Ranking scientists , 2015, Nature Physics.

[10]  Birger Larsen,et al.  A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicators , 2014, Scientometrics.

[11]  Marek Gagolewski,et al.  Scientific impact assessment cannot be fair , 2013, J. Informetrics.

[12]  Alex De Visscher,et al.  What does the g-index really measure? , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  Sauro Succi,et al.  Statistical regularities in the rank-citation profile of scientists , 2011, Scientific reports.

[14]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  hg-index: a new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h- and g-indices , 2010, Scientometrics.

[15]  Leo Egghe,et al.  Lotkaian informetrics and applications to social networks , 2009 .

[16]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields , 2009, J. Informetrics.

[17]  G. Cocho,et al.  Universality of Rank-Ordering Distributions in the Arts and Sciences , 2009, PloS one.

[18]  Gerhard J. Woeginger,et al.  An axiomatic characterization of the Hirsch-index , 2008, Math. Soc. Sci..

[19]  Jie Tang,et al.  ArnetMiner: extraction and mining of academic social networks , 2008, KDD.

[20]  Nicole Mitchell.  Library 2.0: A guide to participatory library service , 2008 .

[21]  Michael Schreiber,et al.  An empirical investigation of the g-index for 26 physicists in comparison with the h-index, the A-index, and the R-index , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[22]  G. Cocho,et al.  Tail universalities in rank distributions as an algebraic problem: The beta-like function , 2007, 0705.0551.

[23]  Quentin L. Burrell,et al.  On the h-index, the size of the Hirsch core and Jin's A-index , 2007, J. Informetrics.

[24]  R. Rousseau,et al.  The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index , 2007 .

[25]  L. Egghe,et al.  Theory and practise of the g-index , 2006, Scientometrics.

[26]  Leo Egghe,et al.  An informetric model for the Hirsch-index , 2006, Scientometrics.

[27]  Charles Auffray,et al.  F1000Prime recommendation of An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. , 2005 .