Deformities in larval gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata): A qualitative and quantitative analysis using geometric morphometrics

Abstract Deformities in commercially raised fish are a common source of downgrading of product value. During the intensive rearing of gilthead sea bream ( Sparus aurata ), opercular deformities are the most commonly observed type of deformation (affecting up to 80% of the fisheries stock), sometimes showing a severe inward folding of the operculum. They are non-lethal malformations that appear during the larval stage but affect growth rate and morphology, with a significant economic loss as a consequence. In order to exploratory quantify and qualify these deformities, geometric morphometric analyses were performed on the external morphology from larvae with an age ranging from 50 to 69 days post-hatching (DPH), and on the cranial skeleton of 110 DPH old juveniles. The results showed several osteological cranial shifts and a striking left–right independency associated with deoperculation. Even though a significant size difference was observed at 65 DPH between normal and deoperculated specimens, allometries during the examined growth stages still appear to be very similar in normal and deoperculated specimens. At 69 DPH deoperculated specimens differed significantly from the normal specimens in their external morphology based on its shape variables, but the results suggest that discrimination is possible from earlier stages. Further analyses are needed, but the usefulness of this approach towards developing an early detection tool could be demonstrated.

[1]  D. Power,et al.  Osteologic development of the viscerocranial skeleton in sea bream: alternative ossification strategies in teleost fish , 2001 .

[2]  J. Sévigny,et al.  Geometric morphometrics reveals body shape differences between sympatric redfish Sebastes mentella, Sebastes fasdatus and their hybrids in the Gulf of St Lawrence , 2002 .

[3]  M. Yúfera,et al.  Effects of temperature on egg and larval development of Sparus aurata L. , 1991 .

[4]  M. Kentouri,et al.  Morphometric relationships as criteria for the evaluation of larval quality of gilthead sea bream , 1995, Aquaculture International.

[5]  F. Rohlf,et al.  Geometric morphometrics: Ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’ , 2004 .

[6]  E. Balon.  Terminology of Intervals in Fish Development , 1975 .

[7]  F. Rohlf,et al.  Morphometric Analysis of Old World Talpidae (Mammalia, Insectivora) Using Partial-Warp Scores , 1996 .

[8]  R. Musetti,et al.  A preliminary histological and ultrastructural study of opercular anomalies in gilthead sea bream larvae (Sparus aurata) , 2000, Fish Physiology and Biochemistry.

[9]  D. Tave,et al.  Semi-Operculum: A Non-Heritable Birth Defect in Tilapia nilotica , 1994 .

[10]  M. Cavalcanti,et al.  Landmark-based morphometric analysis in selected species of serranid fishes (Perciformes : Teleostei) , 1999 .

[11]  Nikos Papandroulakis,et al.  Enhanced biological performance of intensive sea bream (Sparus aurata) larviculture in the presence of phytoplankton with long photophase , 2002 .

[12]  Clara Boglione,et al.  Geometric morphometrics and internal anatomy in sea bass shape analysis (Dicentrarchus labrax L., Moronidae) , 2000 .

[13]  P. Dodson.  On the Use of Ratios in Growth Studies , 1978 .

[14]  M. Yúfera,et al.  Feeding, physiology and growth responses in first-feeding gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.) larvae in relation to prey density , 2000 .

[15]  Michele Scardi,et al.  Skeletal descriptors and quality assessment in larvae and post-larvae of wild-caught and hatchery-reared gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L. 1758) , 2001 .

[16]  F. Rohlf,et al.  Extensions of the Procrustes Method for the Optimal Superimposition of Landmarks , 1990 .

[17]  W. Taylor,et al.  Revised procedures for staining and clearing small fishes and other vertebrates for bone and cartilage study , 1985 .

[18]  D. Tocher,et al.  Effects of dietary docosahexaenoic acid (DHA; 22:6n−3) on lipid and fatty acid compositions and growth in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.) larvae during first feeding , 1993 .

[19]  T. Takeuchi,et al.  Effects of n−3 HUFA levels in broodstock diet on the reproductive performance and egg and larval quality of the Japanese flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus , 2000 .

[20]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop , 1992 .

[21]  J. Osse,et al.  Larval growth patterns in Cyprinus carpio and Clarias gariepinus with attention to the finfold , 1997 .

[22]  E. Tibaldi,et al.  Abnormalities of the operculum in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata): morphological description , 2003 .

[23]  S. Lele,et al.  The promise of geometric morphometrics. , 2002, American journal of physical anthropology.

[24]  M. Kentouri,et al.  Ontogeny of the shi drum Umbrina cirrosa (Linnaeus 1758), a candidate new species for aquaculture , 2005 .

[25]  B. Bengtsson,et al.  Abnormalities of a gill cover bone, the operculum, in perch Perca fluviatilis from a pulp mill effluent area , 1994 .

[26]  M. Osman,et al.  Growth, Survival and Feed Conversion Rates of Sea Bream (Sparus aurata) Cultured in Earthen Brackish Water Ponds Fed Different Feed Types , 2004, Aquaculture International.

[27]  A. Tandler,et al.  The effects of photoperiod and water exchange rate on growth and survival of gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata, linnaeus; sparidae) from hatching to metamorphosis in mass rearing systems , 1985 .

[28]  A Loy,et al.  Shape changes and growth trajectories in the early stages of three species of the genus Diplodus (Perciformes, Sparidae) , 2001, Journal of morphology.

[29]  A. Barbaro,et al.  Daurade Sparus aurata L. reproduite artificiellement et daurade sauvage. Expériences paralleles en diverses conditions d'élevage , 1988 .

[30]  G. Arnqvist,et al.  Measurement error in geometric morphometrics : Empirical strategies to assess and reduce its impact on measures of shape , 1998 .

[31]  T. Takeuchi,et al.  Nutritional components affecting skeletal development in fish larvae , 2003 .

[32]  L. Mariani,et al.  Visualizing allometry: Geometric morphometrics in the study of shape changes in the early stages of the two‐banded sea bream, Diplodus vulgaris (Perciformes, Sparidae) , 1998, Journal of morphology.

[33]  M. Izquierdo,et al.  Association of a lordosis-scoliosis-kyphosis deformity in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) with family structure , 2000, Fish Physiology and Biochemistry.

[34]  M. Barahona-Fernandes.  Body deformation in hatchery reared European sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax (L). Types, prevalence and effect on fish survival , 1982 .

[35]  D. H. Taylor,et al.  Inbreeding depression in the convict cichlid, Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum (Baird and Girard) , 1982 .

[36]  F. Rohlf,et al.  A revolution morphometrics. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[37]  Stefano Cataudella,et al.  Geometric morphometrics and morpho‐anatomy: a combined tool in the study of sea bream (Sparus aurata, sparidae) shape , 1999 .

[38]  J. Andrades,et al.  Skeletal deformities in larval, juvenile and adult stages of cultured gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.) , 1996 .

[39]  L. F. Marcus,et al.  Advances in Morphometrics , 1996, NATO ASI Series.

[40]  Maroudio Kentouri,et al.  The opercular complex deformity in intensive gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.) larviculture. Moment of apparition and description , 1997 .

[41]  B. Chatain,et al.  Improved rate of initial swim bladder inflation in intensively reared Sparus auratus , 1990 .

[42]  I. Paperna.  Swimbladder and skeletal deformations in hatchery bred Spams aurata , 1978 .

[43]  Clara Boglione,et al.  Normal and abnormal osteological development of caudal fin in Sparus aurata L. fry , 1997 .

[44]  J. D. Niswander,et al.  Developmental 'noise' and a congenital malformation. , 1967, Genetical research.