Right Colectomy with Intracorporeal Anastomosis: A European Multicenter Propensity Score Matching Retrospective Study of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Procedures

[1]  F. Ris,et al.  Conversion to Open Surgery During Minimally Invasive Right Colectomy for Cancer: Results from a Large Multinational European Study. , 2023, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[2]  F. Ris,et al.  Impact of operation duration on postoperative outcomes of minimally‐invasive right colectomy , 2022, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[3]  F. Ris,et al.  Predictors of surgical outcomes of minimally invasive right colectomy: the MERCY study , 2022, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[4]  M. Pędziwiatr,et al.  Bowel function after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a randomized controlled trial comparing intracorporeal anastomosis and extracorporeal anastomosis , 2021, Surgical Endoscopy.

[5]  M. Zheng,et al.  Short-term outcomes of complete mesocolic excision versus D2 dissection in patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy for right colon cancer (RELARC): a randomised, controlled, phase 3, superiority trial. , 2021, The Lancet. Oncology.

[6]  F. Brunetti,et al.  Laparoscopic versus robotic right colectomy with extra-corporeal or intra-corporeal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2020, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.

[7]  G. Ceccarelli,et al.  Robotic or three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy for right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision (CME) and intracorporeal anastomosis? A propensity score-matching study comparison , 2020, Surgical Endoscopy.

[8]  A. Doussot,et al.  Intra‐operative fluorescence angiography is reproducible and reduces the rate of anastomotic leak after colorectal resection for cancer: a prospective case‐matched study , 2020, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[9]  M. Morino,et al.  Intracorporeal or Extracorporeal Ileocolic Anastomosis After Laparoscopic Right Colectomy: A Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2019, Annals of surgery.

[10]  A. Marano,et al.  Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy within a systematic ERAS protocol: a propensity-weighted analysis , 2020, Updates in Surgery.

[11]  Jing Zhou,et al.  Incidence of and risk factors for surgical site infection after colorectal surgery: a multiple-center prospective study of 3,663 consecutive patients in China. , 2020, International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases.

[12]  J. Dimick,et al.  Trends in the Adoption of Robotic Surgery for Common Surgical Procedures , 2020, JAMA network open.

[13]  L. Boni,et al.  Intraoperative angiography with indocyanine green to assess anastomosis perfusion in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection: results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial , 2020, Surgical Endoscopy.

[14]  I. Gich,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy (IEA trial) , 2019, The British journal of surgery.

[15]  L. Pecchia,et al.  Is robotic right colectomy economically sustainable? a multicentre retrospective comparative study and cost analysis , 2019, Surgical Endoscopy.

[16]  F. Brunetti,et al.  Indocyanine green fluorescence guided robotic right colectomy with intra‐corporeal anastomosis – a video vignette , 2019, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[17]  D. Blumberg.  Robotic colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis is feasible with no operative conversions during the learning curve for an experienced laparoscopic surgeon developing a robotics program , 2018, Journal of Robotic Surgery.

[18]  G. Choi,et al.  Long-term oncologic after robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a prospective randomized study , 2018, Surgical Endoscopy.

[19]  A. Ambrosi,et al.  Right colectomy: consecutive 100 patients treated with laparoscopic and robotic technique for malignancy. Cumulative experience in a single centre , 2018, Updates in Surgery.

[20]  A. Cucchetti,et al.  Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: a multicenter comparative analysis on short-term outcomes , 2018, Surgical Endoscopy.

[21]  D. Ribero,et al.  Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Right Colectomy with Complete Mesocolic Excision for the Treatment of Colon Cancer: Perioperative Outcomes and 5-Year Survival in a Consecutive Series of 202 Patients , 2018, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[22]  M. Weiser,et al.  AJCC 8th Edition: Colorectal Cancer , 2018, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[23]  J. Ngu,et al.  Robotics confers an advantage in right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis when matched against conventional laparoscopy , 2018, Journal of Robotic Surgery.

[24]  P. Delrio,et al.  Recovery after intracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2018, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.

[25]  Chien-Chih Chen,et al.  Real-world cost-effectiveness of laparoscopy versus open colectomy for colon cancer: a nationwide population-based study , 2017, Surgical Endoscopy.

[26]  F. Brunetti,et al.  Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Right Colectomy for Colon Cancer: Analysis of the Initial Simultaneous Learning Curve of a Surgical Fellow. , 2016, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[27]  C. Delaney,et al.  A national evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes in open versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery , 2016, Surgical Endoscopy.

[28]  L. Segev,et al.  Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: short- and long-term benefits in comparison with extracorporeal anastomosis , 2016, Surgical Endoscopy.

[29]  J. Tuynman,et al.  Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2016, Surgical Endoscopy.

[30]  B. Logan,et al.  Observational Studies: Matching or Regression? , 2016, Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

[31]  M. Guerrieri,et al.  Totally robotic vs 3D laparoscopic colectomy: A single centers preliminary experience. , 2015, World journal of gastroenterology.

[32]  P. Delrio,et al.  Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis. Results from a multicentre comparative study on 512 right-sided colorectal cancers , 2015, Surgical Endoscopy.

[33]  R. Cirocchi,et al.  Robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis compared with laparoscopic right colectomy with extracorporeal and intracorporeal anastomosis: a retrospective multicentre study , 2015, Surgical Endoscopy.

[34]  K. Augestad,et al.  Effect of laparoscopic surgery on health care utilization and costs in patients who undergo colectomy. , 2015, JAMA surgery.

[35]  S. Kitano,et al.  Short-Term Surgical Outcomes From a Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Laparoscopic and Open D3 Dissection for Stage II/III Colon Cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404 , 2014, Annals of surgery.

[36]  O. Dent,et al.  Risk Factors for Prolonged Ileus After Resection of Colorectal Cancer: An Observational Study of 2400 Consecutive Patients , 2013, Annals of surgery.

[37]  G. Choi,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of robot‐assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy , 2012, The British journal of surgery.

[38]  P. Austin.  Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[39]  Antoni Castells,et al.  The Long-term Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial of Laparoscopy-assisted Versus Open Surgery for Colon Cancer , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[40]  Peter C Austin,et al.  A critical appraisal of propensity‐score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003 , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[41]  S. Pocock,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[42]  S. Pocock,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2007, Preventive medicine.

[43]  Peter C Austin,et al.  The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[44]  R. Veldkamp,et al.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer : short-term outcomes of a randomised trial , 2022 .

[45]  N. Demartines,et al.  Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey , 2004, Annals of Surgery.

[46]  H. Kim,et al.  Balance diagnostics after propensity score matching. , 2019, Annals of translational medicine.