Clone attack! Perception of crowd variety

When simulating large crowds, it is inevitable that the models and motions of many virtual characters will be cloned. However, the perceptual impact of this trade-off has never been studied. In this paper, we consider the ways in which an impression of variety can be created and the perceptual consequences of certain design choices. In a series of experiments designed to test people's perception of variety in crowds, we found that clones of appearance are far easier to detect than motion clones. Furthermore, we established that cloned models can be masked by color variation, random orientation, and motion. Conversely, the perception of cloned motions remains unaffected by the model on which they are displayed. Other factors that influence the ability to detect clones were examined, such as proximity, model type and characteristic motion. Our results provide novel insights and useful thresholds that will assist in creating more realistic, heterogeneous crowds.

[1]  Jessica K. Hodgins,et al.  Perception of Human Motion With Different Geometric Models , 1998, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[2]  Céline Loscos,et al.  Visualizing Crowds in Real‐Time , 2002, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[3]  Daniel Thalmann,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/cav.147 , 2022 .

[4]  Lucas Kovar,et al.  Motion graphs , 2002, SIGGRAPH Classes.

[5]  Bobby Bodenheimer,et al.  Computing the duration of motion transitions: an empirical approach , 2004, SCA '04.

[6]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  Populating Ancient Pompeii with Crowds of Virtual Romans , 2007, VAST.

[7]  Jessica K. Hodgins,et al.  Interactive control of avatars animated with human motion data , 2002, SIGGRAPH.

[8]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Obscuring length changes during animated motion , 2004, SIGGRAPH 2004.

[9]  Carol O'Sullivan,et al.  Perceptual evaluation of LOD clothing for virtual humans , 2006, SCA '06.

[10]  Carol O'Sullivan,et al.  Geopostors: a real-time geometry/impostor crowd rendering system , 2005, SIGGRAPH '05.

[11]  Jonathan Maïm,et al.  Reviving the Roman Odeon of Aphrodisias: Dynamic Animation and Variety Control of Crowds in Virtual Heritage , 2005 .

[12]  T. Beardsworth,et al.  The ability to recognize oneself from a video recording of one’s movements without seeing one’s body , 1981 .

[13]  Rachel McDonnell,et al.  Perceptual Evaluation of Impostor Representations for Virtual Humans and Buildings , 2005, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[14]  C. O'Sullivan,et al.  LOD human representations: a comparative study , 2005 .

[15]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues , 1977 .

[16]  Nancy S. Pollard,et al.  Perceptual metrics for character animation: sensitivity to errors in ballistic motion , 2003, ACM Trans. Graph..

[17]  Daniel Thalmann,et al.  Real-time Shader Rendering for Crowds in Virtual Heritage , 2005, VAST.

[18]  Jean-Paul Laumond,et al.  Real-time navigating crowds: scalable simulation and rendering: Research Articles , 2006 .

[19]  Okan Arikan Compression of motion capture databases , 2006, SIGGRAPH 2006.

[20]  Daniel Thalmann,et al.  Populating virtual environments with crowds , 2006, VRCIA '06.

[21]  Lucas Kovar,et al.  Motion Graphs , 2002, ACM Trans. Graph..

[22]  Jessica K. Hodgins,et al.  Virtual shapers & movers: form and motion affect sex perception , 2007, APGV.

[23]  Pedro V. Sander,et al.  Drawing a Crowd , 2004 .

[24]  Daniel Thalmann,et al.  Towards Interactive Real‐Time Crowd Behavior Simulation , 2002, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[25]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[26]  Carol O'Sullivan,et al.  Clothing the Masses: Real-Time Clothed Crowds With Variation , 2006, Eurographics.